IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v463y2010i7284d10.1038_nature08785.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neural evidence for inequality-averse social preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth Tricomi

    (Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey 07102, USA)

  • Antonio Rangel

    (Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences,
    Computational and Neural Systems, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA)

  • Colin F. Camerer

    (Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences,
    Computational and Neural Systems, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA)

  • John P. O’Doherty

    (Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences,
    Computational and Neural Systems, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
    School of Psychology and Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College)

Abstract

For richer, for poorer Based on experimental and field evidence, social scientists commonly assume that human behaviour favours outcomes that are 'fair', keeping inequality to a minimum since experience suggests that in the long run all will benefit. Now a novel role-play experiment in human male volunteers whose brain activity was being tracked by functional magnetic resonance imaging provides evidence for a neural basis for such 'inequality-averse' social preferences. The experiment starts with one of a pair of participants being made 'rich', receiving a large monetary payout; the other receives nothing and stays 'poor'. Neural responses in the striatum and prefrontal cortex of the 'rich' subjects were stronger when the other individual received further payments. In the 'poor' subjects, neural responses in the same areas were stronger when they themselves received the money. This suggests that the brain's reward circuitry is sensitive to distribution inequality and is actively modulated relative to context.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth Tricomi & Antonio Rangel & Colin F. Camerer & John P. O’Doherty, 2010. "Neural evidence for inequality-averse social preferences," Nature, Nature, vol. 463(7284), pages 1089-1091, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:463:y:2010:i:7284:d:10.1038_nature08785
    DOI: 10.1038/nature08785
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature08785
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature08785?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:463:y:2010:i:7284:d:10.1038_nature08785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.