This article applies to microeconomics a classic distinction of the philosophy of language, i.e., that between analytical and synthetic propositions. A further article will combine it with the epistemological distinction between a priori and a posteriori knowledge. We start by reconsidering the main definitions of the analytical and the synthetic. We rebut Quine?s famous objections against them, and then show how they operate on the theory of Giffen goods and substitute goods. The distinction makes it possible to clarify decisions that microeconomists leave implicit, at the risk of falling into semantic traps. In the particular instance, it reinforces the existing critique of Hicks?s definition of substitutes. As an secondary contribution, we show that economic methodology wrongly identifies analytical propositions with tautologies, and synthetic propositions with testable ones.
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Article provided by De Boeck Université in its journal Recherches économiques de Louvain.
Volume (Year): 72 (2006)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
Pages: 349-383
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:cai:reldbu:rel_724_0349Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.cairn.info
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire).
Keywords: Other versions of this item:
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: - Vandermeulen, Daniel C, 1972.
"Upward Sloping Demand Curves Without the Giffen Paradox,"
American Economic Review,
American Economic Association, vol. 62(3), pages 453-58, June.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
- Philippe Mongin, 2006.
"Value Judgments and Value Neutrality in Economics,"
Economica,
London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 73(290), pages 257-286, 05.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
- M. Browning & P. A. Chiappori, 1998.
"Efficient Intra-Household Allocations: A General Characterization and Empirical Tests,"
Econometrica,
Econometric Society, vol. 66(6), pages 1241-1278, November.
Other versions:
- Martin Browning & Pierre-Andre Chiappori, 1994.
"Efficient Intra-Household Allocations: a General Characterization and Empirical Tests,"
Department of Economics Working Papers
1994-02, McMaster University.
[Downloadable!]
- Browning, M. & Chiappori, P.A., 1994.
"Efficient Intra-Household allocations: A General Characterization and Empirical Tests,"
DELTA Working Papers
94-16, DELTA (Ecole normale supérieure).
- Martin Browning & P.A. Chiappori, 1996.
"Efficient Intra-Household Allocations - A General Characterization and Empirical Tests,"
Discussion Papers
96-10, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
- Patinkin, Don, 1969.
"The Chicago Tradition, the Quantity Theory, and Friedman,"
Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,
Blackwell Publishing, vol. 1(1), pages 46-70, February.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
- Battalio, Raymond C & Kagel, John H & Kogut, Carl A, 1991.
"Experimental Confirmation of the Existence of a Giffen Good,"
American Economic Review,
American Economic Association, vol. 81(4), pages 961-70, September.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
- Richard G. Lipsey & Gideon Rosenbluth, 1971.
"A Contribution to the New Theory of Demand: A Rehabilitation of the Giffen Good,"
Canadian Journal of Economics,
Canadian Economics Association, vol. 4(2), pages 131-63, May.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full
referencesAccess and
download statisticsDid you know? You can create your own reading lists on IDEAS.
This page was last updated on 2009-12-4.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.