IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/v61y2015i6id153-2014-agricecon.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Natural climatic conditions as a determinant of productivity and economic efficiency of agricultural entities

Author

Listed:
  • Peter ADAMIŠIN

    (Department of Environmental Management, Faculty of Management, University of Presov, Prešov, Slovak Republic)

  • Rastislav KOTULIČ

    (Department of Economic Sciences and Economy, Faculty of Management, University of Presov, Prešov, Slovak Republic)

  • Ivana KRAVČÁKOVÁ VOZÁROVÁ

    (Department of Economic Sciences and Economy, Faculty of Management, University of Presov, Prešov, Slovak Republic)

  • Roman VAVREK

    (Department of Finance and Accounting, Faculty of Management, University of Presov, Prešov, Slovak Republic)

Abstract

The scientific contribution builds on the previous scientific studies analysing the determinants of productivity and economic efficiency of the agricultural entities and extends the knowledge of the spatial econometrics area at the NUTS IV level (at the district level) for the reporting period. The paper aimed to assess the development of productivity and economic efficiency of the agricultural entities in the reporting period based on the synthetic evaluation of the selected economic indicators by the methods of cluster analysis, and so to create a spatial map according to the regional differentiation at the NUTS IV level. On the basis of the completed analysis, we can conclude that the natural and climatic conditions have a dominant influence on the achievable productivity and economic efficiency of the agricultural entities in ensuring the sustainability of the economic performance of agriculture in different regions of Slovakia. On the basis of conducting the analysis, there were clearly defined two relatively coherent areas in Slovakia (at the district level), which are characterized by differences in the achieved production indicators and allow the regional differentiation of Slovakia into districts with more and less prosperous agricultural enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter ADAMIŠIN & Rastislav KOTULIČ & Ivana KRAVČÁKOVÁ VOZÁROVÁ & Roman VAVREK, 2015. "Natural climatic conditions as a determinant of productivity and economic efficiency of agricultural entities," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(6), pages 265-274.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:61:y:2015:i:6:id:153-2014-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/153/2014-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/153/2014-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/153/2014-AGRICECON.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/153/2014-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kalirajan, K. P. & Shand, R. T., 2001. "Technology and farm performance: paths of productive efficiencies over time," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 297-306, March.
    2. E. Matejková & A. Qineti & R. Serenčéš, 2008. "Macroeconomic aspects of the development of Slovak regions in the post-accession period," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 54(8), pages 367-375.
    3. A. Juřica & T. Medonos & L. Jelínek, 2004. "Structural changes and efficiency in Czech agriculture in the pre-accession period," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 50(3), pages 130-138.
    4. Kilmer, Richard L. & Armbruster, Walter J., 1984. "Methods For Evaluating Economic Efficiency In Agricultural Marketing," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, July.
    5. Z. Sojková & Z. Kropková & V. Benda, 2008. "Slovak agricultural farms in different regions - comparison of efficiency," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 54(4), pages 158-165.
    6. P. Bielik & M. Rajčániová, 2004. "Competitiveness analysis of agricultural enterprises in Slovakia," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 50(12), pages 556-560.
    7. Wiebe, Keith D., 2003. "Linking Land Quality, Agricultural Productivity, And Food Security," Agricultural Economic Reports 34073, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    8. S. Covaci & Z. Sojková, 2006. "Investigation of wheat efficiency and productivity development in Slovakia," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(8), pages 368-378.
    9. Ariel Dinar & Giannis Karagiannis & Vangelis Tzouvelekas, 2007. "Evaluating the impact of agricultural extension on farms' performance in Crete: a nonneutral stochastic frontier approach," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 36(2), pages 135-146, March.
    10. Jan Pokrivcak & Christophe Crombez & Johan F. M. Swinnen, 2006. "The status quo bias and reform of the Common Agricultural Policy: impact of voting rules, the European Commission and external changes," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 33(4), pages 562-590, December.
    11. Kilmer, Richard L. & Armbruster, Walter J., 1984. "Methods for Evaluating Economic Efficiency in Agricultural Marketing," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 101-110, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter ADAMIŠIN & Rastislav KOTULIČ, 2013. "Evaluation of the agrarian businesses results according to their legal form," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(9), pages 396-402.
    2. Emerson M. Babb, 1986. "Production and operations management," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 2(4), pages 421-429.
    3. Brown, Colin G. & Drynan, Ross G., 1986. "On Some Aspects of Organizational Efficiency in the Queensland Cattle Slaughtering Industry," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 54(02), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Guy Nkamleu, 2004. "Productivity Growth, Technical Progress and Efficiency Change in African Agriculture," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 16(1), pages 203-222.
    5. Z. Chrastinová, 2008. "Economic differentiation in Slovak agriculture," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 54(11), pages 536-545.
    6. Imre Fertő & László Á Kóczy & Attila Kovács & Balázs R Sziklai, 0. "The power ranking of the members of the Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 47(5), pages 1897-1919.
    7. Wollni, Meike & Brümmer, Bernhard, 2012. "Productive efficiency of specialty and conventional coffee farmers in Costa Rica: Accounting for technological heterogeneity and self-selection," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 67-76.
    8. Anania, Giovanni, 2007. "Multilateral Negotiations, Preferential Trade Agreements and the CAP. What's Ahead?," Working Papers 7283, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.
    9. Schläpfer, Felix & Baur, Ivo, 2017. "Does CAP spending reflect taxpayer preferences? An analysis of expenditures for public goods and income redistribution in relation to preference indicators," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 261105, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Billé, AG & Salvioni, C. & Benedetti, R., 2015. "Spatial Heterogeneity In Production Functions Models," 150th Seminar, October 22-23, 2015, Edinburgh, Scotland 212662, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Eiichi Tomiura & Banri Ito & Hiroshi Mukunoki & Ryuhei Wakasugi, 2016. "Individual Characteristics, Behavioral Biases, and Trade Policy Preferences: Evidence from a Survey in Japan," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(5), pages 1081-1095, November.
    12. Mussa, Richard, 2017. "Long-term Effects of Early Life Maize Yield on Maize Productivity and Efficiency in Rural Malawi," MPRA Paper 75975, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Swinnen, Johan F.M., 2010. "The Political Economy of the Most Radical Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 59(Supplemen), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Micheels, Eric T. & Nolan, James F., 2016. "Examining the effects of absorptive capacity and social capital on the adoption of agricultural innovations: A Canadian Prairie case study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 127-138.
    15. Lohr, Luanne & Park, Timothy, 2012. "Demand for Private Marketing Expertise by Organic Farmers: A Quantile Analysis Based on Counts," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(2), pages 157-171, May.
    16. Singbo, Alphonse G. & Emvalomatis, Grigorios & Alfons, Oude Lansink, 2013. "Assessing the impact of crop specialization on farms’ performance in vegetables farming in Benin: a non-neutral stochastic frontier approach," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 149172, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Phu Nguyen-Van & Nguyen To-The, 2016. "Technical efficiency and agricultural policy: evidence from the teaproduction in Vietnam," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 97(3), pages 173-184.
    18. Gupta, Sonika & Sharma, R.K., 2010. "Land Degradation – Its Extent and Determinants in Mountainous Regions of Himachal Pradesh," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 23(1), January.
    19. Johan F.M. Swinnen, 2008. "The Political Economy of the 2003 Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy," LICOS Discussion Papers 21508, LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, KU Leuven.
    20. Peter ADAMISIN & Rastislav KOTULIC & Ivana KRAVCAKOVA VOZAROVA, 2017. "Legal form of agricultural entities as a factor in ensuring the sustainability of the economic performance of agriculture," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(2), pages 80-92.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:61:y:2015:i:6:id:153-2014-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.