IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdr/ensayo/v28y2010i62p196-225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacto de la política pública sobre la demanda cultural: el caso de cuatro museos en Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanni Andrés Hernández Salazar
  • Ana María Olaya Pardo

Abstract

Para incentivar la demanda a los museos, el Gobierno colombiano creó la Ley 580 del año 2000, que estableció la entrada gratuita a los museos entre el 15 de julio y 15 de agosto. La aplicación de esta ley produjo un incremento en la demanda de usuarios durante estos meses, pero generó una disminución en los ingresos por boletería. Para resolver esta situación, se aprobó la Ley 929 del año 2004, que establece la entrada gratuita a los museos el último domingo de cada mes. Este trabajo investiga el impacto de la Ley 929 sobre los ingresos por boletería y visitantes a cuatro museos de Bogotá. Se construyó una base de datos de visitantes e ingresos para el período 2001-2008 y se estimaron modelos univariados ARIMA de intervención. Se concluye que la ley tuvo un impacto positivo sobre los ingresos por boletería de todos los museos, pero no que no modificó el comportamiento sobre la demanda de los visitantes.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanni Andrés Hernández Salazar & Ana María Olaya Pardo, 2010. "Impacto de la política pública sobre la demanda cultural: el caso de cuatro museos en Colombia," Revista ESPE - Ensayos sobre Política Económica, Banco de la Republica de Colombia, vol. 28(62), pages 196-225, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bdr:ensayo:v:28:y:2010:i:62:p:196-225
    DOI: 10.32468/Espe.6205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.32468/Espe.6205
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32468/Espe.6205?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Ashworth & Peter Johnson, 1996. "Sources of “value for money” for museum visitors: Some survey evidence," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 20(1), pages 67-83, March.
    2. R.G.W. Anderson, 1998. "Is Charging Economic?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 22(2), pages 179-187, June.
    3. Antonella Basso & Stefania Funari, 2004. "A Quantitative Approach to Evaluate the Relative Efficiency of Museums," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 28(3), pages 195-216, August.
    4. Charles W. Bausell Jr., Frank W. Rusco and W. David Walls, 2001. "Lifting the Alaskan Oil Export Ban: An Intervention Analysis," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4), pages 81-94.
    5. Stephen Bailey & Peter Falconer, 1998. "Charging for Admission to Museums and Galleries: A Framework for Analysing the Impact on Access," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 22(2), pages 167-177, June.
    6. Adrian Darnell, 1998. "Some Simple Analytics of Access and Revenue Targets," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 22(2), pages 189-196, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. García Gracia, Mª Isabel. & Zofío Prieto, José Luis & Herrarte Sánchez, Ainhoa & Moral Carcedo, Julian, 2009. "La aportación económica de la industria de la cultura y el ocio en España/," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 27, pages 63-88, Abril.
    2. Elena GORI & Silvia FISSI, 2013. "From Cash to Accrual Accounting: A Model to Evaluate the Performance of Public Museums," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(4), pages 519-541, October.
    3. Juan Prieto-Rodríguez & Víctor Fernández-Blanco, 2006. "Optimal pricing and grant policies for museums," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 30(3), pages 169-181, December.
    4. Elina Lampi & Matilda Orth, 2009. "Who Visits the Museums? A Comparison between Stated Preferences and Observed Effects of Entrance Fees," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 85-102, February.
    5. Shabbar Jaffry & Alexandros Apostolakis, 2011. "Evaluating individual preferences for the British Museum," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 35(1), pages 49-75, February.
    6. Bruno S. Frey & Lasse Steiner, 2010. "Pay as you go: a new proposal for museum pricing," IEW - Working Papers 485, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    7. Victor Fernández-Blanco & Juan Prieto-Rodríguez, 2011. "Museums," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse (ed.), A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition, chapter 40, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Vincent G. Munley, 2018. "A Contingent Valuation Analysis of the Galway City Museum: Welfare Estimates for Attendance in the Absence of an Admission Fee," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 49(4), pages 489-514.
    9. David Maddison, 2004. "Causality and Museum Subsidies," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 28(2), pages 89-108, May.
    10. Alexandros Apostolakis & Shabbar Jaffry, 2013. "An Analysis of Monetary Voluntary Contributions for Cultural Resources: The Case of the British Museum," Tourism Economics, , vol. 19(3), pages 631-651, June.
    11. Frey, Bruno S. & Meier, Stephan, 2006. "The Economics of Museums," Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, in: V.A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 29, pages 1017-1047, Elsevier.
    12. Mazzanti, Massimiliano, 2003. "Valuing cultural heritage in a multi-attribute framework microeconomic perspectives and policy implications," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 549-569, November.
    13. Chr. Hjorth-Andersen, 2004. "The Danish Museum System," Discussion Papers 04-34, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    14. Alessio Emanuele Biondo & Roberto Cellini & Tiziana Cuccia, 2020. "Choices on museum attendance: An agent‐based approach," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(4), pages 882-897, November.
    15. Fenghua Zhang & Pascal Courty, 2022. "The China museum visit boom: Government or demand driven?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 46(1), pages 135-163, March.
    16. M. Mazraati & S.M. Tayyebi Jazayeri, 2004. "Oil price movements and production agreements," OPEC Energy Review, Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, vol. 28(3), pages 207-226, September.
    17. Nida Cakir Melek & Michael Plante & Mine Yucel, 2021. "Resource Booms and the Macroeconomy: The Case of U.S. Shale Oil," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 42, pages 307-332, October.
    18. Adela Coman, 2018. "The Economics of Cultural Heritage: The Case of Museums," Manager Journal, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 28(1), pages 63-73, December.
    19. Calogero Guccio & Giacomo Pignataro & Ilde Rizzo, 2014. "Evaluating the efficiency of public procurement contracts for cultural heritage conservation works in Italy," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 38(1), pages 43-70, February.
    20. Pei-Hsuan Tsai & Chin-Tsai Lin, 2018. "How Should National Museums Create Competitive Advantage Following Changes in the Global Economic Environment?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Politica Publica; ARIMA; intervención; museos; demanda;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
    • Y - Miscellaneous Categories
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdr:ensayo:v:28:y:2010:i:62:p:196-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Clorith Angélica Bahos Olivera (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/brcgvco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.