IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/rtv/ceisrp/268.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

The Socially Responsible Choice in a Duopolistic Market: a Dynamic Model of "Ethical Product" Differentiation

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Leonardo Becchetti & Nazaria Solferino & Maria Elisabetta Tessitore, 2014. "A dynamic model of Gambling addiction with social costs: theory and policy solutions," AICCON Working Papers 133-2014, Associazione Italiana per la Cultura della Cooperazione e del Non Profit.
  2. Luciano Fanti & Domenico Buccella, 2017. "Bargaining agenda in a unionised monopoly with network effects: when corporate social responsibility may be welfare-reducing," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 34(3), pages 471-489, December.
  3. Bhardwaj, Pradeep & Chatterjee, Prabirendra & Demir, Kivilcim Dogerlioglu & Turut, Ozge, 2018. "When and how is corporate social responsibility profitable?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 206-219.
  4. Iannucci, Gianluca & Tampieri, Alessandro, 2024. "The persistence of environmental and social strategies under emission permits," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
  5. Alessandro FEDELE & Sara DE PEDRI, 2016. "In Medio Stat Virtus: Does A Mixed Economy Increase Welfare?," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 87(3), pages 345-363, December.
  6. Mark Bagnoli & Susan G. Watts, 2020. "On the corporate use of green bonds," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 187-209, January.
  7. Hamid Hamoudi & Carmen Avilés-Palacios & Ana Belén Miquel Burgos, 2025. "The Optimal CSR and Sustainability Approach in a Spatial Duopoly: A Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-21, June.
  8. Leong, Chee Kian & Yang, Yung Chiang, 2020. "Market competition and firms' social performance," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 601-612.
  9. Cao Thi Mien Thuy & Nguyen Vinh Khuong & Nguyen Thanh Liem, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Its Effect on Firm Risk: An Empirical Research on Vietnamese Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-13, November.
  10. Solferino, Nazaria & Solferino, Viviana, 2016. "The Corporate Social Responsibility is just a twist in a Möbius strip," Economics Discussion Papers 2016-12, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
  11. Marlene Karl, 2015. "Are Ethical and Social Banks Less Risky? Evidence from a New Dataset," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1484, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  12. You-Hua Chen & Xiao-Wei Wen & Ming-Zhong Luo, 2016. "Corporate Social Responsibility Spillover and Competition Effects on the Food Industry," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 1-13, March.
  13. Leonardo Becchetti & Nazaria Solferino & M. Tessitore, 2015. "How to safeguard world heritage sites? A theoretical model of “cultural responsibility”," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 62(3), pages 223-248, September.
  14. Candel-Sánchez, Francisco & Perote-Peña, Juan, 2024. "How does corporate altruism affect oligopolistic competition?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
  15. Lambertini, Luca & Tampieri, Alessandro, 2015. "Incentives, performance and desirability of socially responsible firms in a Cournot oligopoly," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 40-48.
  16. Nollet, Joscha & Filis, George & Mitrokostas, Evangelos, 2016. "Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 400-407.
  17. Chang, Juin-Jen & Chen, Jhy-Hwa & Tsai, Ming-Fang, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility, social optimum, and the environment-growth tradeoff," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
  18. Dongdong Li & Leonard F. S. Wang, 2022. "Does environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR) promote green product and process innovation?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1439-1447, July.
  19. Nazaria Solferino & Viviana Solferino, 2015. "The Corporate Social Responsibility is just a twist in a M\"obius Strip," Papers 1510.03398, arXiv.org.
  20. Marlene Karl, 2015. "Are Ethical and Social Banks Less Risky? Evidence from a New Dataset. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 96," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58138.
  21. Nazaria Solferin & Viviana Solferino, 2015. "The Corporate Social Responsibility is just a twist in a Möbius Strip," AICCON Working Papers 142-2015, Associazione Italiana per la Cultura della Cooperazione e del Non Profit.
  22. Okimoto, Madoka, 2015. "International price competition among food industries: The role of income, population and biased consumer preference," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 327-339.
  23. Andaluz, J. & Elsadany, A.A. & Jarne, G., 2023. "Dynamic behavior in a Cournot duopoly with social responsibility," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
  24. Solferino, Nazaria & Solferino, Viviana, 2016. "The corporate social responsibility is just a twist in a Möbius strip," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 10, pages 1-24.
  25. Lopez Arceiz, Francisco & Solferino, Nazaria & Solferino, Viviana & Tortia, Ermanno C., 2016. "Corporate social responsibility is just a twist in a Möbius Strip: An empirical test on Italian cooperatives," MPRA Paper 74776, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  26. Shen, Na & Su, Jun, 2015. "A comparison of different contract forms for consumers with switching costs and changed preferences," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 19-26.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.