IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/pst/wpaper/231.html

Leaky Bucket in the Real World: Estimating Inequality Aversion Using Survey Data

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Erik Schokkaert & Benoît Tarroux, 2021. "Empirical research on ethical preferences: how popular is prioritarianism?," Working Papers halshs-03110312, HAL.
  2. Tovar Reaños, Miguel A. & Sommerfeld, Katrin, 2018. "Fuel for inequality: Distributional effects of environmental reforms on private transport," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 28-43.
  3. Stanislaw Maciej Kot, 2019. "Deriving The Parameter Of Inequality Aversion From A Parametric Distribution Of Incomes," GUT FME Working Paper Series A 58, Faculty of Management and Economics, Gdansk University of Technology.
  4. Tovar Rea os, Miguel & Lynch, Muireann ., 2019. "Distributional impacts of carbon taxation and revenue recycling: a behavioural microsimulation," Papers WP626, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
  5. Granja, Cintia Denise & Carneiro, Ana Maria, 2021. "Attitudes towards inequality in Brazil: An analysis of a highly unequal country," MERIT Working Papers 2021-009, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
  6. Ben Groom & David Maddison Pr., 2019. "New Estimates of the Elasticity of Marginal Utility for the UK," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 72(4), pages 1155-1182, April.
  7. Rafael Salas & Juan Rodríguez, 2013. "Popular support for social evaluation functions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 40(4), pages 985-1014, April.
  8. Sheriff, Glenn & Maguire, Kelly, 2013. "Ranking Distributions of Environmental Outcomes Across Population Groups," National Center for Environmental Economics-NCEE Working Papers 280914, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  9. Yamamura, Eiji, 2011. "Effect of social capital on income distribution preferences: comparison of neighborhood externality between high- and low-income households," MPRA Paper 32557, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  10. Marcelo Bérgolo & Gabriel Burdín & Santiago Burone & Mauricio de Rosa & Matías Giaccobasso & Martín Leites, 2020. "Dissecting Inequality-Averse Preferences," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 20-19, Instituto de Economía - IECON.
  11. Aristei, David & Perugini, Cristiano, 2010. "Preferences for redistribution and inequality in well-being across Europe," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 176-195, March.
  12. Jake Guth & David Munro, 2020. "Preferences for efficiency and redistribution: An experiment using charitable donations," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(3), pages 2217-2226.
  13. Cropper, Maureen & Krupnick, Alan & Raich, William, 2016. "Preferences for Equality in Environmental Outcomes," RFF Working Paper Series dp-16-36, Resources for the Future.
  14. Cojocaru, Alexandru, 2014. "Fairness and inequality tolerance: Evidence from the Life in Transition Survey," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 590-608.
  15. Miqdad Asaria & Joan Costa-Font & Frank Cowell, 2023. "How does exposure to COVID-19 influence health and income inequality aversion?," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 61(3), pages 625-647, October.
  16. Dietrich, Stephan & Malerba, Daniele & Barrientos, Armando & Gassmann, Franziska, 2017. "Rates of return to antipoverty transfers in Uganda," MERIT Working Papers 2017-040, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
  17. Matthew Adler & David Anthoff & Valentina Bosetti & Greg Garner & Klaus Keller & Nicolas Treich, 2017. "Priority for the worse-off and the social cost of carbon," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(6), pages 443-449, June.
  18. Markus Tepe & Fabian Paetzel & Jan Lorenz & Maximilian Lutz, 2021. "Efficiency loss and support for income redistribution: Evidence from a laboratory experiment," Rationality and Society, , vol. 33(3), pages 313-340, August.
  19. Olli Kärkkäinen, 2013. "Revealed preferences for redistribution and government’s elasticity expectations," Working Papers 284, Työn ja talouden tutkimus LABORE, Labour Institute for Economic Research LABORE.
  20. Christoph Böhringer & Florian Landis & Miguel Angel Tovar Reaños, 2016. "Cost-Effectiveness and Incidence of Renewable Energy Promotion in Germany," ZenTra Working Papers in Transnational Studies 66 / 2016, ZenTra - Center for Transnational Studies, revised Oct 2016.
  21. Santiago Burone & Martin Leites, 2021. "Self-centered and non-self-centered inequality aversion matter: Evidence from Uruguay based on an experimental survey," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 19(2), pages 265-291, June.
  22. Hurley, Jeremiah & Mentzakis, Emmanouil & Walli-Attaei, Marjan, 2020. "Inequality aversion in income, health, and income-related health," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
  23. Mulenga, Arnold & Ataguba, John Ele-Ojo, 2017. "Assessing income redistributive effect of health financing in Zambia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 1-10.
  24. Gaston, Noel & Rajaguru, Gulasekaran, 2013. "International migration and the welfare state revisited," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 90-101.
  25. Keigo Kameda & Miho Sato, 2017. "Distributional preference in Japan," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 68(3), pages 394-408, September.
  26. Schnellenbach, Jan, 2012. "The economics of taxing net wealth: A survey of the issues," Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 12/5, Walter Eucken Institut e.V..
  27. Antonio Abatemarco, 2017. "Evaluating Economic Mobility under Opportunity Egalitarianism," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(12), pages 260-277, December.
  28. Wolfgang Buchholz & Jan Schumacher, 2008. "Discounting the Long-Distant Future: A Simple Explanation for the Weitzman-Gollier-Puzzle," CESifo Working Paper Series 2357, CESifo.
  29. Richard Layard & Ekaterina Oparina, 2026. "What is the public's social welfare function?," Papers 2606.13752, arXiv.org.
  30. Olivier Sterck, 2024. "Poverty Without Poverty Line," CSAE Working Paper Series 2024-07, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
  31. Alexandru Cojocaru, 2011. "Inequality and well-being in transition economies: A non-experimental test of inequality aversion," Working Papers 238, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
  32. Huang, Luling & Nock, Destenie, 2024. "Estimating the income-related inequality aversion to energy limiting behavior in the United States," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
  33. Lockwood, Benjamin B. & Weinzierl, Matthew, 2016. "Positive and normative judgments implicit in U.S. tax policy, and the costs of unequal growth and recessions," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 30-47.
  34. García-Muros, Xaquín & Morris, Jennifer & Paltsev, Sergey, 2022. "Toward a just energy transition: A distributional analysis of low-carbon policies in the USA," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
  35. repec:aen:journl:ej38-si1-bohringer is not listed on IDEAS
  36. Buchholz, Wolfgang & Schumacher, Jan, 2010. "Discounting and welfare analysis over time: Choosing the [eta]," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 372-385, September.
  37. repec:dau:papers:123456789/6913 is not listed on IDEAS
  38. Böhringer, Christoph & Landis, Florian & Tovar, Miguel, 2022. "The Incidence of Carbon Pricing: From Input-Output via Microsimulation to General Equilibrium," VfS Annual Conference 2022 (Basel): Big Data in Economics 264067, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.