IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/bla/jemstr/v27y2018i3p554-578.html

The USPTO Patent Examination Research Dataset: A window on patent processing

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Davit Khachatryan & Brigitte Muehlmann, 2020. "Measuring the drafting alignment of patent documents using text mining," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, July.
  2. deGrazia, Charles A.W. & Pairolero, Nicholas A. & Teodorescu, Mike H.M., 2021. "Examination incentives, learning, and patent office outcomes: The use of examiner’s amendments at the USPTO," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(10).
  3. Zhang, Gupeng & Xiong, Libin & Duan, Hongbo & Huang, Dujuan, 2020. "Obtaining certainty vs. creating uncertainty: Does firms’ patent filing strategy work as expected?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
  4. Michael J. Andrews, 2021. "Historical patent data: A practitioner's guide," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 368-397, May.
  5. Righi, Cesare & Cannito, Davide & Vladasel, Theodor, 2023. "Continuing patent applications at the USPTO," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(4).
  6. Raffiee, Joseph & Teodoridis, Florenta & Fehder, Daniel, 2023. "Partisan patent examiners? Exploring the link between the political ideology of patent examiners and patent office outcomes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(9).
  7. Marco, Alan C. & Sarnoff, Joshua D. & deGrazia, Charles A.W., 2019. "Patent claims and patent scope," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
  8. Jiaxin Yuan & Xianhui Zong & Guiyang Zhang & Yong Qi, 2025. "Potential Analysis of Technological Value in the Intelligent Connected Vehicles Field from the Patent Licensing Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, June.
  9. Eduardo Melero & Neus Palomeras & David Wehrheim, 2020. "The Effect of Patent Protection on Inventor Mobility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 5485-5504, December.
  10. Desai, Pranav, 2021. "Essays in corporate finance and innovation," Other publications TiSEM 1ef5fdc6-9c52-43df-be1a-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
  11. Gaétan de Rassenfosse & Reza Hosseini, 0. "Discrimination against foreigners in the U.S. patent system," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-18.
  12. Stuart J. H. Graham & Alan C. Marco & Amanda F. Myers, 2018. "Patent transactions in the marketplace: Lessons from the USPTO Patent Assignment Dataset," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 343-371, September.
  13. Evelina Gavrilova-Zoutman & Steffen Juranek, 2025. "The Role of Reviewer Characteristics on the Diversity of Successful Applicants," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 1726-1744, September.
  14. Cesare Righi & Timothy Simcoe, 2022. "Patenting inventions or inventing patents? Continuation practice at the USPTO," Economics Working Papers 1820, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
  15. Pairolero, Nicholas A. & de Grazia, Charles A.W., 2026. "Automated routing, patent examiner specialization, and quasi-random assignment at the USPTO," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(4).
  16. Elena M. Tur & Arjan Markus, 2025. "Repeated examiner-attorney interaction and patent approval," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(2), pages 619-639, February.
  17. Gaétan de Rassenfosse & Reza Hosseini, 2020. "Discrimination against foreigners in the U.S. patent system," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(4), pages 349-366, December.
  18. Cesare Righi & Timothy Simcoe, 2023. "Patenting inventions or inventing patents? Continuation practice at the USPTO," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 54(3), pages 416-442, September.
  19. Cesare Righi & Timothy Simcoe, 2022. "Patenting Inventions or Inventing Patents? Continuation Practice at the USPTO," Working Papers 1320, Barcelona School of Economics.
  20. Alexander V. Giczy & Nicholas A. Pairolero & Andrew A. Toole, 2022. "Identifying artificial intelligence (AI) invention: a novel AI patent dataset," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 476-505, April.
  21. Hege, Ulrich & Li, Kai & Zhang, Yifei, 2025. "Climate Innovation and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Supply Chain Networks," TSE Working Papers 25-1608, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
  22. de Grazia, Charles A.W. & Giczy, Alexander V. & Pairolero, Nicholas A., 2024. "Procrastination or incomplete data? An analysis of USPTO examiner search activity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(7).
  23. Cesare Righi & Timothy Simcoe, 2020. "Patenting Inventions or Inventing Patents? Continuation Practice at the USPTO," NBER Working Papers 27686, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  24. de Rassenfosse, Gaétan & Pellegrino, Gabriele & Raiteri, Emilio, 2024. "Do patents enable disclosure? Evidence from the invention secrecy act," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
  25. Nicholas A. Pairolero & Andrew A. Toole & Peter-Anthony Pappas & Charles A. W. de Grazia & Mike H. M. Teodorescu, 2025. "Closing the Gender Gap in Patenting: Evidence from a Randomized Control Trial at the USPTO," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 17(3), pages 281-310, August.
  26. Jesse Frumkin & Nicholas A. Pairolero & Asrat Tesfayesus & Andrew A. Toole, 2024. "Patent eligibility after Alice: Evidence from USPTO patent examination," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 748-769, August.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.