IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/aea/aejmic/v9y2017i1p1-30.html

Social Status in Networks

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Goldbaum, David, 2021. "The origins of influence," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 380-396.
  2. Alastair Langtry, 2022. "Keeping up with "The Joneses": reference dependent choice with social comparisons," Papers 2203.10305, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
  3. Isabel Melguizo & Sergio Tovar, 2025. "Effort Provision in Peer Groups," Working Papers DTE 646, CIDE, División de Economía.
  4. Ghiglino,C. & Langtry, A., 2023. "Status Substitution and Conspicuous Consumption," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2324, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
  5. Rezaei, Sarah & Rosenkranz, Stephanie & Weitzel, Utz & Westbrock, Bastian, 2024. "Social preferences on networks," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
  6. Evan Sadler & Benjamin Golub, 2021. "Games on Endogenous Networks," Papers 2102.01587, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
  7. Haagsma, Rein, 2018. "Income inequality and saving in a class society: The role of ordinal status," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy, vol. 12, pages 1-31.
  8. Lorenz Götte & Egon Tripodi, 2022. "Social Recognition: Experimental Evidence from Blood Donors," CESifo Working Paper Series 9719, CESifo.
  9. López-Pintado, Dunia & Meléndez-Jiménez, Miguel A., 2021. "Far above others," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    • Dunia López-Pintado & Miguel A. Meléndez-Jiménez, 2018. "Far above others," Working Papers 18.12, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
  10. Huang, Shaoan & Lien, Jaimie W. & Yang, Siqun & Zheng, Jie, 2024. "Lump-sum tax or flat income tax? Welfare implications of taxation policy in the presence of social comparison," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 20-33.
  11. Cui, Zhiwei & Li, Xueheng & Zhang, Boyu, 2025. "Decomposability and the social comparison trap," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
  12. Nikolai S. Kukushkin & Pierre von Mouche, 2018. "Cournot tatonnement and Nash equilibrium in binary status games," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(2), pages 1038-1044.
  13. Antinyan, Armenak & Horváth, Gergely & Jia, Mofei, 2019. "Social status competition and the impact of income inequality in evolving social networks: An agent-based model," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 53-69.
  14. Antinyan, Armenak & Horváth, Gergely & Jia, Mofei, 2020. "Curbing the consumption of positional goods: Behavioral interventions versus taxation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1-21.
  15. Oded Stark & Jakub Bielawski & Fryderyk Falniowski, 2024. "Measuring income inequality in social networks," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 22(2), pages 333-356, June.
  16. Bramoullé, Y. & Ghiglino, C., 2024. "Status Consumption in Networks: A Reference Dependent Approach," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2414, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
  17. Li, Y., 2026. "Getting Ahead of the "Joneses": The Origin and Implications of Upward Comparison," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2614, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
  18. repec:cam:camjip:2409 is not listed on IDEAS
  19. Kukushkin, Nikolai S., 2022. "Ordinal status games on networks," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
  20. Zhang, Yang & He, Longfei, 2021. "Theory and experiments on network games of public goods: inequality aversion and welfare preference," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 326-347.
  21. Yann Bramoullé & Christian Ghiglino, 2022. "Loss Aversion and Conspicuous Consumption in Networks," Working Papers hal-03630455, HAL.
  22. Haagsma, Rein, 2018. "Income inequality and saving in a class society: The role of ordinal status," Economics Discussion Papers 2018-12, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
  23. Chang, Juin-jen & Liu, Chia-ying & Wang, Wei-neng, 2018. "Conspicuous consumption and trade unionism," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 350-366.
  24. Zeng Lian & Jaimie W. Lien & Lin Lu & Jie Zheng, 2021. "International trade with social comparisons," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 533-556, August.
  25. Joseph Root & Evan Sadler, 2026. "A Theory of Network Games Part 1: Utility Representations," Papers 2602.16071, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
  26. Meng, Dawen, 2025. "Targeting network intervention with social norm," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
  27. Petach, Luke A. & Tavani, Daniele, 2021. "Consumption externalities and growth: Theory and evidence for the United States," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 976-997.
  28. Qingjie Zhou & Mingyue Du & Jiangyuan Hou, 2025. "Role of social network in fostering consumers' omni‐channel purchasing behavior towards infant milk powder retailers," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(3), pages 672-693, July.
  29. Lorenz Goette & Egon Tripodi, 2021. "Social Influence in Prosocial Behavior: Evidence from a Large-Scale Experiment [“Social Distance and Social Decisions]," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 19(4), pages 2373-2398.
  30. Pascal Courty & Merwan Engineer, 2019. "A pure hedonic theory of utility and status: Unhappy but efficient invidious comparisons," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 21(4), pages 601-621, August.
  31. Alastair Langtry & Christian Ghiglino, 2023. "Status substitution and conspicuous consumption," Papers 2303.07008, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
  32. Zhenhua Feng & Jaimie W. Lien & Jie Zheng, 2018. "Keeping up with the Neighbors: Social Interaction in a Production Economy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-14, September.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.