IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/zewdok/0502.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Non-Profit-Organisationen in Deutschland: Ansatzpunkte für eine Refom des Wohlfahrtsstaats

Author

Listed:
  • Kraus, Margit
  • Stegarescu, Dan

Abstract

Ziel dieser Studie ist es, die Potenziale von Non-Profit-Organisationen für eine Entlastung des öffentlichen Sektors zu analysieren und Handlungsempfehlungen für eine verbesserte Ausschöpfung dieser Potenziale zu erarbeiten. Die Untersuchungen fokussieren dabei auf die Bereiche Gesundheitswesen und Soziale Dienste. Analysiert man die gegenwärtige Aufgabenverteilung zwischen dem öffentlichen Sektor, dem Non-Profit-Sektor und dem privaten gewinnorientierten Sektor vor dem Hintergrund der wohlfahrtsökonomischen Theorien zum Non-Profit-Sektor, so ist insgesamt festzustellen, dass die bestehende Aufgabenverteilung zwischen den drei Sektoren in den untersuchten Bereichen recht gut mit den theoretischen Aussagen in Einklang zu bringen ist. Beträchtliche Verlagerungspotenziale vom öffentlichen Sektor in den Non-Profit-Sektor scheinen vor allem im Bereich der allgemeinen Krankenhäuser sowie im Bereich der Kindertagesstätten zu bestehen. Um die Potenziale, den öffentlichen Sektor zu entlasten, bestmöglich zu nutzen, werden allerdings die gegenwärtigen Rahmenbedingungen für Non-Profit-Organisationen noch in wesentlichen Punkten zu verbessern sein.

Suggested Citation

  • Kraus, Margit & Stegarescu, Dan, 2005. "Non-Profit-Organisationen in Deutschland: Ansatzpunkte für eine Refom des Wohlfahrtsstaats," ZEW Dokumentationen 05-02, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:zewdok:0502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/39156/1/578444917.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khanna, Jyoti & Sandler, Todd, 2000. "Partners in giving:: The crowding-in effects of UK government grants," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(8), pages 1543-1556, August.
    2. Gulley, O. David & Santerre, Rexford E., 1993. "The Effect of Tax Exemption on the Market Share of Nonprofit Hospitals," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 46(4), pages 477-86, December.
    3. Marianne F. Johnson, 2003. "Differential Taxation of for-Profit and Nonprofit Firms: A Computational General Equilibrium Approach," Public Finance Review, , vol. 31(6), pages 623-647, November.
    4. Richard STEINBERG, 1991. "Does Government Spending Crowd Out Donations?," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 591-612, October.
    5. Arthur C. Brooks, 2001. "Private Philanthropy and the Economics of Public Radio," Center for Policy Research Working Papers 41, Center for Policy Research, Maxwell School, Syracuse University.
    6. Gulley, O. David & Santerre, Rexford E., 1993. "The Effect of Tax Exemption on the Market Share of Nonprofit Hospitals," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 46(4), pages 477-486, December.
    7. David Easley & Maureen O'Hara, 1983. "The Economic Role of the Nonprofit Firm," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 14(2), pages 531-538, Autumn.
    8. Homburg, Stefan, 2010. "Allgemeine Steuerlehre: Kapitel 1. Grundbegriffe der Steuerlehre," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 92547, September.
    9. James Andreoni & A. Abigail Payne, 2003. "Do Government Grants to Private Charities Crowd Out Giving or Fund-raising?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(3), pages 792-812, June.
    10. Khanna, Jyoti & Posnett, John & Sandler, Todd, 1995. "Charity donations in the UK: New evidence based on panel data," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 257-272, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gruber, Jonathan & Hungerman, Daniel M., 2007. "Faith-based charity and crowd-out during the great depression," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(5-6), pages 1043-1069, June.
    2. Sonia Manzoor & John Straub, 2005. "The robustness of Kingma’s crowd-out estimate: Evidence from new data on contributions to public radio," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 123(3), pages 463-476, June.
    3. Paskalev, Zdravko & Yildirim, Huseyin, 2017. "A theory of outsourced fundraising: Why dollars turn into “Pennies for Charity”," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1-18.
    4. Bartels, Lara & Kesternich, Martin, 2022. "Motivate the crowd or crowd- them out? The impact of local government spending on the voluntary provision of a green public good," ZEW Discussion Papers 22-040, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    5. Franz Hackl & Martin Halla & Gerald Pruckner, 2012. "Volunteering and the state," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 151(3), pages 465-495, June.
    6. Behrens, Christoph & Emrich, Eike & Hämmerle, Martin & Pierdzioch, Christian, 2017. "Match quality, crowding out, and crowding in: Empirical evidence for German sports clubs," Working Papers of the European Institute for Socioeconomics 21, European Institute for Socioeconomics (EIS), Saarbrücken.
    7. Anwar Shah & Karim Khan & Muhammad Tariq Majeed, 2015. "The Effects of Informational Framing on Charitable Pledges - Experimental Evidence from a Fund Raising Campaign," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 54(1), pages 35-54.
    8. Garth Heutel, 2014. "Crowding Out and Crowding In of Private Donations and Government Grants," Public Finance Review, , vol. 42(2), pages 143-175, March.
    9. Fuminori Toyasaki & Tina Wakolbinger, 2014. "Impacts of earmarked private donations for disaster fundraising," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 221(1), pages 427-447, October.
    10. Carmen Marcuello & Vicente Salas, 2001. "Nonprofit Organizations, Monopolistic Competition, and Private Donations: Evidence from Spain," Public Finance Review, , vol. 29(3), pages 183-207, May.
    11. Eckel, Catherine C. & Grossman, Philip J. & Johnston, Rachel M., 2005. "An experimental test of the crowding out hypothesis," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(8), pages 1543-1560, August.
    12. Thomas More Smith, 2007. "The Impact Of Government Funding On Private Contributions To Nonprofit Performing Arts Organizations," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(1), pages 137-160, March.
    13. Anup Malani & Tomas Philipson & Guy David, 2003. "Theories of Firm Behavior in the Nonprofit Sector. A Synthesis and Empirical Evaluation," NBER Chapters, in: The Governance of Not-for-Profit Organizations, pages 181-216, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Peter Nunnenkamp & Hannes Öhler, 2012. "Funding, Competition and the Efficiency of NGOs : An Empirical Analysis of Non‐charitable Expenditure of US NGOs Engaged in Foreign Aid," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(1), pages 81-110, February.
    15. David C. Ribar & Mark O. Wilhelm, 2002. "Altruistic and Joy-of-Giving Motivations in Charitable Behavior," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 110(2), pages 425-457, April.
    16. Bardsley, Nicholas & Sausgruber, Rupert, 2005. "Conformity and reciprocity in public good provision," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 664-681, October.
    17. Josphat Nyoni & Tendai Vanesssa Jaravaza & Matthew Mare & Martin Dandira & Elias Kandjinga, 2021. "Policy Contradictions and Policy Dilemma: A Case of Intermediary Money Transfer Tax (IMTT) on Business Performance in the Engineering Sector in Zimbabwe," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(2), pages 76-89, June.
    18. Nunnenkamp, Peter & Öhler, Hannes, 2010. "Donations to US based NGOs in international development cooperation: How (un-)informed are private donors?," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 117, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    19. Gibbons, Steve & Hilber, Christian Albin Lukas, 2022. "Charity in the time of austerity: in search of the 'Big Society'," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117995, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Anthony B. Atkinson & Peter G. Backus & John Micklewright & Cathy Pharoah & Sylke V. Schnepf, 2012. "Charitable giving for overseas development: UK trends over a quarter century," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 175(1), pages 167-190, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:zewdok:0502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zemande.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.