IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbctn/spiv2003103.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Die Umweltpolitik der rot-grünen Koalition: Strategien zwischen nationaler Pfadabhängigkeit und globaler Politikkonvergenz

Author

Listed:
  • Kern, Kristine
  • Koenen, Stephanie
  • Löffelsend, Tina

Abstract

Die Umweltpolitik gilt als wichtiger Eckpfeiler rot-grüner Politik in Deutschland. Um deren Erfolg beurteilen zu können, müssen nationale Pfadabhängigkeiten wie auch globale Politikkonvergenzen berücksichtigt werden. Deshalb wird eine Konzeption gewählt, die zwei Dimensionen umfasst: das Ausmaß des Politikwandels, der entweder radikal oder lediglich moderat sein kann, und Deutschlands Stellung im internationalen Vergleich als Vorreiter oder Nachzügler. Auf dieser Grundlage lassen sich vier Typen von politischen Strategien unterscheiden: (1) Vorangehen („moving first“), (2) Aufholen („catching up“), (3) in Führung bleiben („staying ahead“), (4) Zurückbleiben („lagging behind“). Basierend auf dieser Typologie werden vier Fälle untersucht: die Energiepolitik, die Ökologisierung des Steuersystems, die Klimapolitik und die nationale Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie. Die Fallstudien zeigen erstens, dass ein Wechsel des Politikpfades in Bereichen stattfand, die schon immer einen prominenten Platz auf der grünen Agenda eingenommen haben (Ausstieg aus der Atomenergie, Ökosteuer). Zweitens wird deutlich, dass Politikinnovationen, die sich im Ausland bereits bewährt haben, den Politikwandel erheblich erleichtern, weil diese Ansätze von politischen Unternehmern als Referenzpunkt genutzt werden können. Drittens verfolgt Deutschland in Bereichen, in denen das Land Vorreiter ist, multilaterale Strategien: Um die eigene Position zu sichern, werden andere Länder zur Übernahme ähnlicher Politiken veranlasst.

Suggested Citation

  • Kern, Kristine & Koenen, Stephanie & Löffelsend, Tina, 2003. "Die Umweltpolitik der rot-grünen Koalition: Strategien zwischen nationaler Pfadabhängigkeit und globaler Politikkonvergenz," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Civil Society and Transnational Networks SP IV 2003-103, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbctn:spiv2003103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/49596/1/371179270.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    2. Weidner, Helmut, 1989. "Die Umweltpolitik der konservativ-liberalen Regierung im Zeitraum 1983 bis 1988: Versuch einer politikwissenschaftlichen Bewertung," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Standard-setting and Environment FS II 89-304, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. Schmidt, Manfred G., 1987. "West Germany: The Policy of the Middle Way," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 135-177, April.
    4. Joachim Schleich & Wolfgang Eichhammer & Ulla Boede & Frank Gagelmann & Eberhard Jochem & Barbara Schlomann & Hans-Joachim Ziesing, 2001. "Greenhouse gas reductions in Germany-lucky strike or hard work?," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(3), pages 363-380, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kounetas, Konstantinos & Stergiou, Eirini, 2020. "European industrial eco-efficiency under different pollutants' scenarios and heterogeneity structures. Is there a definite direction?," MPRA Paper 98583, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Mechthild Donner & Anne Verniquet & Jan Broeze & Katrin Kayser & Hugo de Vries, 2021. "Critical success and risk factors for circular business models valorising agricultural waste and by-products," Post-Print hal-03004851, HAL.
    3. Cornelis Leeuwen & Jos Frijns & Annemarie Wezel & Frans Ven, 2012. "City Blueprints: 24 Indicators to Assess the Sustainability of the Urban Water Cycle," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(8), pages 2177-2197, June.
    4. CHEN, Helen S.Y., 2020. "Designing Sustainable Humanitarian Supply Chains," OSF Preprints m82ar, Center for Open Science.
    5. Jim Butcher, 2006. "The United Nations International Year of Ecotourism: a critical analysis of development implications," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 6(2), pages 146-156, April.
    6. Denise Ravet, 2011. "Lean production: the link between supply chain and sustainable development in an international environment," Post-Print hal-00691666, HAL.
    7. Mara Del Baldo, 2012. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Italian SMEs: the experience of some “spirited businesses”," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(1), pages 1-36, February.
    8. Megan Devonald & Nicola Jones & Sally Youssef, 2022. "‘We Have No Hope for Anything’: Exploring Interconnected Economic, Social and Environmental Risks to Adolescents in Lebanon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    9. Rigby, Dan & Woodhouse, Phil & Young, Trevor & Burton, Michael, 2001. "Constructing a farm level indicator of sustainable agricultural practice," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 463-478, December.
    10. Michael Howes & Liana Wortley & Ruth Potts & Aysin Dedekorkut-Howes & Silvia Serrao-Neumann & Julie Davidson & Timothy Smith & Patrick Nunn, 2017. "Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Shiferaw, Bekele & Holden, Stein, 1999. "Soil Erosion and Smallholders' Conservation Decisions in the Highlands of Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 739-752, April.
    12. Ibrahim Ari & Muammer Koc, 2018. "Sustainable Financing for Sustainable Development: Understanding the Interrelations between Public Investment and Sovereign Debt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.
    13. Parnphumeesup, Piya & Kerr, Sandy A., 2011. "Stakeholder preferences towards the sustainable development of CDM projects: Lessons from biomass (rice husk) CDM project in Thailand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3591-3601, June.
    14. Pengji Wang & Adrian T. H. Kuah & Qinye Lu & Caroline Wong & K. Thirumaran & Emmanuel Adegbite & Wesley Kendall, 2021. "The impact of value perceptions on purchase intention of sustainable luxury brands in China and the UK," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(3), pages 325-346, May.
    15. Christoph M. Schmidt & Nils aus dem Moore, 2014. "Wie geht es uns? Die W3-Indikatoren für eine neue Wohlstandsmessung," RWI Positionen, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, pages 16, 03.
    16. Katundu Imasiku & Valerie M. Thomas & Etienne Ntagwirumugara, 2020. "Unpacking Ecological Stress from Economic Activities for Sustainability and Resource Optimization in Sub-Saharan Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-12, April.
    17. Chin-Shan Lu & Kuo-Chung Shang & Chi-Chang Lin, 2016. "Examining sustainability performance at ports: port managers’ perspectives on developing sustainable supply chains," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 909-927, November.
    18. Kebede, Yohannes, 1993. "The Limits to Common Resource Management: The Bypassed Commons or Commons without Tragedy," MPRA Paper 662, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 May 1993.
    19. John Stanley & Janet Stanley, 2023. "Improving Appraisal Methodology for Land Use Transport Measures to Reduce Risk of Social Exclusion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.
    20. Piotr Siemiątkowski & Patryk Tomaszewski & Joanna Marszałek-Kawa & Janusz Gierszewski, 2020. "The Financing of Renewable Energy Sources and the Level of Sustainable Development of Poland’s Provinces in the Area of Environmental Order," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbctn:spiv2003103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.