IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbccs/zz2022601.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Solidarität und Protest in der Zeitenwende: Reaktionen der Zivilgesellschaft auf den Ukraine-Krieg

Author

Listed:
  • Höltmann, Gesine
  • Hutter, Swen
  • Rößler-Prokhorenko, Charlotte

Abstract

Im folgenden Bericht geben wir eine empirische Übersicht über Ausmaß, Formen und Motive des sozialen und politischen Engagements in Deutschland im Kontext des Ukraine-Krieges. Zum einen zog es zahlreiche Menschen auf die Straßen, um Solidarität mit der Ukraine zu bekunden; zum anderen engagierten sich viele Bürger*innen für die Menschen, die nach Deutschland fliehen mussten. Unsere Ergebnisse, basierend auf einer quotenbasierten Umfrage, zeigen ein mit dem "Sommer der Solidarität" 2015 vergleichbar hohes Mobilisierungsniveau und die zentrale Bedeutung informeller Mobilisierungskanäle und Hilfsaktionen. Die Teilnahme an den Friedensdemonstrationen und soziales Engagement für die Ukraine gingen für viele Menschen Hand in Hand. Betrachtet man die zentralen Konfliktgegenstände der gegenwärtigen Krise - Russland, Migration, Lebenshaltungskosten - zeigt sich allerdings, dass das soziale Engagement etwas stärker entlang dieser Konflikte strukturiert ist als die Friedensdemonstrationen, die ganz unterschiedliche Einstellungsmuster vereinten. Letzteres verdeutlicht das Dilemma einer Friedensbewegung in Kriegszeiten.

Suggested Citation

  • Höltmann, Gesine & Hutter, Swen & Rößler-Prokhorenko, Charlotte, 2022. "Solidarität und Protest in der Zeitenwende: Reaktionen der Zivilgesellschaft auf den Ukraine-Krieg," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Center for Civil Society Research ZZ 2022-601, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbccs:zz2022601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/265547/1/1819781569.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anders Åslund, 2022. "A New Perspective on the Ukrainian Refugee Crisis," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 23(04), pages 3-7, July.
    2. André Sapir, 2022. "Ukraine and the EU: Enlargement at a New Crossroads," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 57(4), pages 213-217, July.
    3. Grande, Edgar, 2018. "Zivilgesellschaft, politischer Konflikt und soziale Bewegungen," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 31(1-2), pages 52-60.
    4. Paul J. J. Welfens, 2022. "Der Start des Ukraine-Russland-Krieges," Springer Books, in: Russlands Angriff auf die Ukraine, chapter 0, pages 25-48, Springer.
    5. Brady, Henry E. & Verba, Sidney & Schlozman, Kay Lehman, 1995. "Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 89(2), pages 271-294, June.
    6. Paul J. J. Welfens, 2022. "Zeitenwenden im Ukraine-Russland-Krieg," Springer Books, in: Russlands Angriff auf die Ukraine, chapter 0, pages 49-74, Springer.
    7. Paul J. J. Welfens, 2022. "Russlands Angriff auf die Ukraine," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-658-38855-3, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bergmann, Julian & Romanyshyn, Iulian, 2022. "Rebuilding Ukraine: How the EU should support Ukraine's reconstruction and recovery," IDOS Policy Briefs 6/2022, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), Bonn.
    2. Paweł Węgrzyn & Anna Topczewska, 2023. "Związek między wojną w Ukrainie a kształtowaniem się relacji depozytów do kredytów w bankach w Polsce," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 54(2), pages 129-152.
    3. Jung-In Jo & Hyun Jin Choi, 2019. "Enigmas of grievances about inequality: Effects of attitudes toward inequality and government redistribution on protest participation," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 22(4), pages 348-368, December.
    4. Denny,Elaine Kathryn & Dow,David & Levy,Gabriella & Villamizar-Chaparro,Mateo, 2022. "Extortion and Civic Engagement among Guatemalan Deportees," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10020, The World Bank.
    5. Bourguignon, Francois, 2005. "The Effect of Economic Growth on Social Structures," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 27, pages 1701-1747, Elsevier.
    6. Ronconi, Lucas & Zarazaga S.J., Rodrigo, 2015. "Labor Exclusion and the Erosion of Citizenship Responsibilities," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 453-461.
    7. Antoci Angelo & Sabatini Fabio & Sodini Mauro, 2009. "Will growth and technology destroy social interaction? The inverted U-shape hypothesis," wp.comunite 0057, Department of Communication, University of Teramo.
    8. Evelien Tonkens & Imrat Verhoeven, 2019. "The civic support paradox: Fighting unequal participation in deprived neighbourhoods," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(8), pages 1595-1610, June.
    9. Poy, Samuele & Schüller, Simone, 2016. "Internet and Voting in the Web 2.0 Era: Evidence from a Local Broadband Policy," IZA Discussion Papers 9991, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Grillos, Tara, 2017. "Participatory Budgeting and the Poor: Tracing Bias in a Multi-Staged Process in Solo, Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 343-358.
    11. Wegenast, Tim, 2010. "Cana, café, cacau: agrarian structure and educational inequalities in Brazil," Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 103-137, March.
    12. Chia-Hui Chen & Chao-Lung Liu & Bryant Pui Hung Hui & Ming-Lun Chung, 2020. "Does Education Background Affect Digital Equal Opportunity and the Political Participation of Sustainable Digital Citizens? A Taiwan Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.
    13. Campante, Filipe R. & Chor, Davin, 2014. "“The people want the fall of the regime”: Schooling, political protest, and the economy," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 495-517.
    14. Ricardo González & Bernardo Mackenna & Estéfano Rubio, 2017. "La tensión entre individualismo y desigualdad en el Chile actual," Informes de Encuesta CEP, in: ¿Malestar en Chile? Informe Encuesta CEP 2016, edition 1, chapter 2, pages 79-107, Centro de Estudios Públicos.
    15. R. Urbatsch, 2012. "The paradox of voting intelligently," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 511-524, March.
    16. Nwankwo Cletus Famous & Okafor Uchenna Paulinus, 2017. "Voting in Nigeria: Determinants of Turnout in the 2015 Presidential Election," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 8(2), pages 249-260, December.
    17. Charles Pattie & Patrick Seyd & Paul Whiteley, 2003. "Citizenship and Civic Engagement: Attitudes and Behaviour in Britain," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 51(3), pages 443-468, October.
    18. Mary Kay Gugerty & Michael Kremer, 2008. "Outside Funding and the Dynamics of Participation in Community Associations," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(3), pages 585-602, July.
    19. Le Anh Nguyen Long, 2016. "Does Social Capital Affect Immigrant Political Participation? Lessons from a Small-N Study of Migrant Political Participation in Rome," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 819-837, August.
    20. Victor G. Hugg & Kelly LeRoux, 2019. "Personality traits as predictors of citizen engagement with local government," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 2(2).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Ukraine-Krieg; Zivilgesellschaft; Engagement; Friedensdemonstrationen; Ukraine-war; civil society; civic engagement; peace protests;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbccs:zz2022601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.