IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbccs/342560.html

Resisting the far right. A systematic analysis of civil society strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Jänicke, Christin
  • Gunzelmann, Hans Jonas
  • Völker, Teresa Sophie
  • Hutter, Swen

Abstract

The rise of the far right in the 21st century poses fundamental challenges for democracy. In this context, understanding how democratic societies respond to the far right is a crucial question. This question concerns not only politicians from democratic parties, but also civil society actors ranging from large trade unions to local sports clubs and grassroots initiatives. However, the existing scholarly work on societal responses to the far right remains scattered across subdisciplines, addresses a narrow range of questions, and focuses on specific segments of civil society only. We address this gap by synthesizing these literatures and providing an analytical framework of civil society strategies against the far right. We conduct a systematic review of 56 peer-reviewed articles and book chapters published between 1972 and 2024, which forms the core of the analysis. We complement this review with a qualitative content analysis of 191 guidance documents from 42 German civil society organizations across nine organizational fields to capture strategies that are less visible in the academic literature. Our analysis identifies five types of civil society strategy: contentious, public-sphere, cultural and educational, networking, and organizational strategies. It shows that the academic literature is heavily skewed toward contentious action, whereas organizational and networking strategies play a central role in practice but remain largely understudied. At the same time, the evidence on effectiveness is limited and unevenly distributed across strategy types, highlighting important gaps in comparative and cross-national research. By integrating scholarly and practitioner knowledge, the study provides a comprehensive overview of civil society strategies against the far right and outlines a research agenda for more systematic analysis of their effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Jänicke, Christin & Gunzelmann, Hans Jonas & Völker, Teresa Sophie & Hutter, Swen, 2026. "Resisting the far right. A systematic analysis of civil society strategies," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Center for Civil Society Research ZZ 2026-602, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbccs:342560
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/342560/1/1979800677.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ryan D. Griffiths & Louis M. Wasser, 2019. "Does Violent Secessionism Work?," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(5), pages 1310-1336, May.
    2. Nettelbladt, Gala, 2023. "Negotiating counterstrategies against the far right in Cottbus, Germany: shifting relations between the state and civil society," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Latest Ar, pages 1-20.
    3. Merkel, Wolfgang & Lührmann, Anna, 2021. "Resilience of democracies: responses to illiberal and authoritarian challenges," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 28(5), pages 869-884.
    4. Völker, Teresa & Saldivia Gonzatti, Daniel, 2024. "Discourse Networks of the Far Right: How Far-Right Actors Become Mainstream in Public Debates," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 41(3), pages 353-372.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mia Doolan & Katie Cox & Kiran M. Sarma, 2025. "PROTOCOL: Understanding the Content, Context, and Impact of Far‐Right Extremist Propaganda Disseminated Online: A Systematic Review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(4), December.
    2. Martijn Huysmans & Christophe Crombez, 2020. "Making exit costly but efficient: the political economy of exit clauses and secession," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 89-110, March.
    3. Harriet Goers & Kathleen Gallagher Cunningham & Laia Balcells, 2025. "Internal drivers of self-rule referendums," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 42(3), pages 308-327, May.
    4. Cupać, Jelena & Schopmans, Hendrik & Tuncer-Ebetürk, İrem, 2024. "Democratization in the age of artificial intelligence: introduction to the special issue," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 31(5), pages 899-921.
    5. Hellmeier, Sebastian, 2022. "Demokratische Resilienz: Auch für Gesellschaften ist die Pandemie ein Stresstest," WZB-Mitteilungen: Quartalsheft für Sozialforschung, WZB Berlin Social Science Center, issue 175 (1/22, pages 25-28.
    6. Mack, Philipp & Wallin, Ida & Zwickel, Mariella Susann & Pfistner, Jonas & König, Lena & Kleinschmit, Daniela, 2025. "Calling into the void? German forest dieback 2.0 debate on Twitter. A case study to operationalize the analysis of discursive power in hybrid media systems," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    7. Rachel Beatty Riedl & Jennifer McCoy & Kenneth Roberts & Murat Somer, 2024. "Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 712(1), pages 8-31, March.
    8. Hans Jonas Gunzelmann, 2025. "How critical junctures shape secessionist movement cohesion: Strategies, framing processes, and interorganizational relations before and after the 2017 referendum in Catalonia," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(4), pages 961-975, July.
    9. Merkel, Wolfgang, 2026. "What is democratic resilience?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 33(3), pages 472-493.
    10. Nadav G Shelef & Yael Zeira, 2023. "International recognition and support for violence among nonpartisans," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 60(4), pages 588-603, July.
    11. Völker, Teresa & Bauer, Mika, 2025. "Strategien, Krisen, Lernprozesse: Die Medien und der Aufstieg der äußersten Rechten," WZB-Mitteilungen: Quartalsheft für Sozialforschung, WZB Berlin Social Science Center, issue 187 (1/25, pages 6-10.
    12. Boese-Schlosser, Vanessa A. & Meißner, Daniel & Ziblatt, Daniel, 2026. "Voters' orientations towards democracy: A new conceptual framework," Discussion Papers, Research Group Waves of Regime Transformation SP V 2026-701, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    13. Bogdan Ștefanachi & Silviu Grecu, 2025. "Governance, Education, and Sustainable Development: A Comparative Analysis in Central and Eastern Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-28, April.
    14. Paolo Moncagatta & Mateo Pazmiño, 2024. "A Tale of a Failed Recovery: Ecuador’s Democratic Stagnation," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 712(1), pages 137-151, March.
    15. Gaku Ito, 2021. "Why does ethnic partition foster violence? Unpacking the deep historical roots of civil conflicts," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(5), pages 986-1003, September.
    16. Völker, Teresa, 2024. "Extrem normal: Die zunehmende Sichtbarkeit der äußersten Rechten," WZB-Mitteilungen: Quartalsheft für Sozialforschung, WZB Berlin Social Science Center, issue 183 (1/24, pages 43-46.
    17. Fredrik von Malmborg, 2024. "Strategies and Impacts of Policy Entrepreneurs: Ideology, Democracy, and the Quest for a Just Transition to Climate Neutrality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-51, June.
    18. Richard Youngs, 2023. "COVID‐19 and democratic resilience," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(1), pages 149-156, February.
    19. Schopmans, Hendrik & Tuncer Ebetürk, İrem, 2024. "Techno-authoritarian imaginaries and the politics of resistance against facial recognition technology in the US and European Union," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 31(5), pages 943-962.
    20. Ammons, Joshua D., 2024. "Institutional effects of nonviolent and violent revolutions," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbccs:342560. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.