IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wtowps/ersd201807.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

WTO trade monitoring ten years on: Lessons learned and challenges ahead

Author

Listed:
  • Bogetoft Pedersen, Peter
  • Diakantoni, Antonia
  • Pérez del Castillo, Carlos
  • Mkhitarian, Amaliia

Abstract

A decade has passed since the onset of the global financial crisis in 2008. Less than a month after the collapse of the investment bank Lehman Brothers, an internal Secretariat Task Force was established by the WTO Director-General to monitor the trade related developments associated with the global financial crisis. When G20 Leaders met in London in early 2009 they mandated the WTO, together with other international bodies, to monitor and report publicly on the G20 adherence to resisting protectionism and promoting global trade and investment. Ten years of trade monitoring later, and notwithstanding widespread anti-trade rhetoric, a protectionist backlash has not materialized. Although there have been worrying increases in the application of certain trade restrictive policy measures, the overall reality has been less alarmist. The paper will provide an introduction to the WTO trade monitoring exercise. It will show how the idea and the principles behind the current trade monitoring effort have origins that go back considerably further than the financial crisis. The paper will also provide an overview of selected trends and developments identified by the monitoring exercise since 2009. Finally, the paper will address some of the challenges facing the WTO monitoring exercise as it enters its tenth year.

Suggested Citation

  • Bogetoft Pedersen, Peter & Diakantoni, Antonia & Pérez del Castillo, Carlos & Mkhitarian, Amaliia, 2018. "WTO trade monitoring ten years on: Lessons learned and challenges ahead," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2018-07, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wtowps:ersd201807
    DOI: 10.30875/5bed3c1f-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/179358/1/1023623897.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30875/5bed3c1f-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabio Panetta & Thomas Faeh & Giuseppe Grande & Corrinne Ho & Michael R King & Aviram Levy & Federico M Signoretti & Marco Taboga & Andrea Zaghini, 2009. "An assessment of financial sector rescue programmes," BIS Papers, Bank for International Settlements, number 48.
    2. Datt, Mohini & Hoekman, Bernard & Malouche, Mariem, 2011. "Taking Stock of Trade Protectionism Since 2008," World Bank - Economic Premise, The World Bank, issue 72, pages 1-9, December.
    3. Pedersen, Peter N., 2011. "The case for creating a Working Party on the Functioning of the WTO," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2011-16, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bogetoft Pedersen, Peter & Diakantoni, Antonia, 2020. "Lessons learned and challenges ahead for the WTO Trade Monitoring exercise," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2020-03, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    2. Cassehgari Posada, Kian & Ganne, Emmanuelle & Piermartini, Roberta, 2020. "The role of WTO committees through the lens of specific trade concerns raised in the TBT committee," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2020-09, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bogetoft Pedersen, Peter & Diakantoni, Antonia, 2020. "Lessons learned and challenges ahead for the WTO Trade Monitoring exercise," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2020-03, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    2. Claudia Buch & Catherine Koch & Michael Koetter, 2016. "Crises and rescues: liquidity transmission through international banks," BIS Working Papers 576, Bank for International Settlements.
    3. Dmitri Kirpichev & Enrique Moral-Benito, 2018. "The costs of trade protectionism: evidence from Spanish firms and non-tariff measures," Working Papers 1814, Banco de España.
    4. Scott E. Page, 2012. "A complexity perspective on institutional design," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 11(1), pages 5-25, February.
    5. Klomp, Jeroen, 2013. "Government interventions and default risk: Does one size fit all?," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 641-653.
    6. Viral Acharya & Itamar Drechsler & Philipp Schnabl, 2014. "A Pyrrhic Victory? Bank Bailouts and Sovereign Credit Risk," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(6), pages 2689-2739, December.
    7. Brei, Michael & Gambacorta, Leonardo & von Peter, Goetz, 2013. "Rescue packages and bank lending," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 490-505.
    8. A. Michael Andrews, 2014. "Effective resolution regimes for financial institutions in ASEAN+3," Chapters, in: Iwan J. Azis & Hyun S. Shin (ed.), Global Shock, Risks, and Asian Financial Reform, chapter 12, pages 464-509, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Andrea Zaghini, 2014. "Bank Bonds: Size, Systemic Relevance and the Sovereign," International Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(2), pages 161-184, June.
    10. Metrick, Andrew, 2020. "Bank Debt Guarantee Programs," Journal of Financial Crises, Yale Program on Financial Stability (YPFS), vol. 2(3), pages 71-100, April.
    11. George M. von Furstenberg, 2011. "Concocting Marketable Cocos," Working Papers 222011, Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research.
    12. Rob Nijskens & Sylvester Eijffinger, 2011. "The Lender of Last Resort: Liquidity Provision versus the Possibility of Bailout," Chapters, in: Sylvester Eijffinger & Donato Masciandaro (ed.), Handbook of Central Banking, Financial Regulation and Supervision, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Michael Brei & Blaise Gadanecz, 2012. "Have public bailouts made banks' loan books safer?," BIS Quarterly Review, Bank for International Settlements, September.
    14. Luisa Kinzius & Alexander Sandkamp & Erdal Yalcin, 2019. "Trade protection and the role of non-tariff barriers," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 155(4), pages 603-643, November.
    15. Beltratti, Andrea & Stulz, René M., 2012. "The credit crisis around the globe: Why did some banks perform better?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 1-17.
    16. Maria J. Nieto & Gillian G. Garcia, 2012. "The insufficiency of traditional safety nets: what bank resolution fund for Europe?," Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(2), pages 116-146, May.
    17. Claudio Borio & Marc Farag & Fabrizio Zampolli, 2023. "Tackling the fiscal policy-financial stability nexus," BIS Working Papers 1090, Bank for International Settlements.
    18. Michael Chui & Dietrich Domanski & Peter Kugler & Jimmy Shek, 2010. "The collapse of international bank finance during the crisis: evidence from syndicated loan markets," BIS Quarterly Review, Bank for International Settlements, September.
    19. Franco Fiordelisi & Ornella Ricci, 2016. "“Whatever it takes”: An Empirical Assessment of the Value of Policy Actions in Banking," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 20(6), pages 2321-2347.
    20. Hett, Florian & Schmidt, Alexander, 2017. "Bank rescues and bailout expectations: The erosion of market discipline during the financial crisis," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 635-651.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    trade monitoring; protectionism; trade restrictions; trade facilitation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F61 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Microeconomic Impacts

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wtowps:ersd201807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wtoerch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.