IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/tudcep/342518.html

RTA exit and trade: Evidence from losing shared trade agreement

Author

Listed:
  • Yao, Zhixiao

Abstract

This paper provides the first global empirical evidence on the trade effects of losing shared regional trade agreement (RTA) coverage. Moving beyond single RTA exit cases, I study worldwide bilateral trade flows from 1980 to 2016 and estimate the effect of de-coverage using a structural gravity model together with a heterogeneity-robust staggered difference-in-differences design. I find that de-coverage reduces bilateral trade by about 37% on average, a magnitude similar to the gains from RTA formation. A key contrast with the RTA entry literature is its dynamics: while trade gains from RTA formation build up gradually over time, the adjustment to de-coverage is front-loaded. Heterogeneity analysis shows larger losses for dyads with longer prior RTA histories, geographically distant partners, and country pairs with asymmetric income levels. Product-level estimates show declines concentrated in intermediate and consumption goods.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao, Zhixiao, 2026. "RTA exit and trade: Evidence from losing shared trade agreement," CEPIE Working Papers 01/26, Technische Universität Dresden, Center of Public and International Economics (CEPIE).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:tudcep:342518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/342518/1/197419387X.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter H. Egger & Ruobing Huang, 2025. "Staggered Treatment Effects With Selection on Unobservables: The Case of Endogenous Preferential Trade Agreement Effects on Trade," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 410-422, May.
    2. Mario Larch & José‐Antonio Monteiro & Roberta Piermartini & Yoto V. Yotov, 2025. "On the trade effects of GATT/WTO membership: They are positive and large after all," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(1), pages 281-328, February.
    3. Nnanna P. Azu, 2022. "Assessing the Costs of Alliance Withdrawal on Trade Determination: A Lesson from Mauritania," Journal of African Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 41-59, January.
    4. Baier, Scott L. & Yotov, Yoto V. & Zylkin, Thomas, 2019. "On the widely differing effects of free trade agreements: Lessons from twenty years of trade integration," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 206-226.
    5. Engel, Charles & Wang, Jian, 2011. "International trade in durable goods: Understanding volatility, cyclicality, and elasticities," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 37-52, January.
    6. Handley, Kyle, 2014. "Exporting under trade policy uncertainty: Theory and evidence," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 50-66.
    7. Guillin, Amélie & Zaki, Chahir, 2026. "Trade flows and RTAs: Does Brexit matter after all?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    8. Yoto V. Yotov, 2022. "On the role of domestic trade flows for estimating the gravity model of trade," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 40(3), pages 526-540, July.
    9. Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. & Larch, Mario & Yotov, Yoto V., 2015. "Economic integration agreements, border effects, and distance elasticities in the gravity equation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 307-327.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arne J. Nagengast & Fernando Rios‐Avila & Yoto V. Yotov, 2026. "The European single market and intra‐EU trade: an assessment with heterogeneity‐robust difference‐in‐differences methods," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 93(369), pages 298-331, January.
    2. Sebastian Franco Bedoya & Woori Lee, 2024. "Heterogeneous Effects of Trade Agreements in Central America : The Case of CAFTA-DR," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10951, The World Bank.
    3. Sivathas, Kumuthini, 2026. "Depth, trade, and welfare analysis of the CPTPP and RCEP: Does deepening RCEP to CPTPP standards make a difference?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    4. Silviano Esteve‐Pérez & Salvador Gil‐Pareja & Rafael Llorca‐Vivero & Jordi Paniagua, 2026. "Has the Euro Paid Off? A Study of the Trade‐Induced Welfare Effects of the EMU," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 58(3), pages 705-737, April.
    5. Dutt, Pushan, 2020. "The WTO is not passé," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    6. Yoto V. Yotov, 2024. "The evolution of structural gravity: The workhorse model of trade," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 42(4), pages 578-603, October.
    7. Larch, Mario & Tan, Shawn W. & Yotov, Yoto V., 2023. "A simple method to ex-ante quantify the unobservable effects of trade liberalization and trade protection," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 1200-1213.
    8. Mario Larch & José‐Antonio Monteiro & Roberta Piermartini & Yoto V. Yotov, 2025. "On the trade effects of GATT/WTO membership: They are positive and large after all," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(1), pages 281-328, February.
    9. Díaz-Mora, Carmen & Esteve-Pérez, Silviano & Gil-Pareja, Salvador, 2023. "A re-assessment of the heterogeneous effect of trade agreements using intra-national trade flows," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 940-951.
    10. Campos, Rodolfo G. & Estefania-Flores, Julia & Furceri, Davide & Timini, Jacopo, 2023. "Geopolitical fragmentation and trade," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 1289-1315.
    11. Roberta Piermartini & Yoto Yotov, 2016. "Estimating Trade Policy Effects with Structural Gravity," School of Economics Working Paper Series 2016-10, LeBow College of Business, Drexel University.
    12. Juan René Rojas Rodríguez & Xenia Matschke, 2023. "The CAFTA-DR Free Trade Agreement — Analyzing its effects in a modern gravity framework," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 27-93, February.
    13. Franco Bedoya,Sebastian, 2023. "Measuring Globalization When It Is Needed the Most : A Long-Run Analysis," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10451, The World Bank.
    14. Felbermayr, Gabriel & Gröschl, Jasmin & Heiland, Inga, 2022. "Complex Europe: Quantifying the cost of disintegration," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    15. Mario Larch & Serge Shikher & Constantinos Syropoulos & Yoto V. Yotov, 2022. "Quantifying the impact of economic sanctions on international trade in the energy and mining sectors," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 60(3), pages 1038-1063, July.
    16. Harald Oberhofer & Zhenyi Wang, 2025. "Everything You Always Wanted to Know About EU Membership Trade Effects But Were Afraid to Ask," Working Papers 202523, Center for Global Policy Analysis, LeBow College of Business, Drexel University.
    17. Carril-Caccia, Federico, 2025. "The impact of economic sanctions on bilateral mergers and acquisitions," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    18. Kwon, Ohyun & Syropoulos, Constantinos & Yotov, Yoto V., 2024. "Identifying and quantifying the extraterritorial effects of sanctions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    19. Franco Bedoya,Sebastian, 2022. "Trade Agreements in South Asia : Towards a Successful Story in the Developing World," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10211, The World Bank.
    20. Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. & Clance, Matthew W. & Santos Silva, J.M.C., 2025. "The tails of gravity: Using expectiles to quantify the trade-margins effects of economic integration agreements," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • F53 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Agreements and Observance; International Organizations

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:tudcep:342518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pltudde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.