IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/sfb597/152.html

Französische Hochschulpolitik: Wandel durch Internationalisierung?

Author

Listed:
  • Dobbins, Michael

Abstract

Dieser Beitrag befasst sich mit den nationalen und internationalen Einflussfaktoren, die in den letzten 25 Jahren drei wesentlichen Dimensionen des französischen Hochschulsystems - politics, policies und polity - geprägt haben. Das Augenmerk der Analyse richtet sich vor allem auf die unterschiedlichen Steuerungsinstrumente und Einflusspotentiale internationaler Organisationen, insbesondere der EU und OECD, sowie die Kapazität des Nationalstaates, Politikwandel hervorzurufen. Von besonderer Bedeutung in diesem Zusammenhang sind institutionelle Vetopunkte und historische verankerte bildungspolitische Leitideen. Es wird gezeigt, dass die französische Hochschulpolitik im Untersuchungszeitraum von einem Spannungsverhältnis zwischen Kontinuität und Wandel geprägt ist. Einerseits lässt sich ein allmählicher Wandel hin zu mehr Autonomie und Wettbewerb für die Hochschulen feststellen, der in den letzten ca. 10 Jahren aufgrund von Internationalisierungsprozessen wie dem Bologna-Prozess sowie dem unterdurchschnittlichen Abschneiden französischer Hochschulen bei internationalen Leistungsvergleichen intensiviert wurde. Anderseits hat das Festhalten an der bildungspolitischen Leitidee der Chancengleichheit in vielen Fällen die Reformdynamik ausgebremst.

Suggested Citation

  • Dobbins, Michael, 2011. "Französische Hochschulpolitik: Wandel durch Internationalisierung?," TranState Working Papers 152, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb597:152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/48857/1/666326843.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niemann, Dennis, 2009. "Changing patterns in German education policy making: the impact of international organizations," TranState Working Papers 99, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    2. Philippe Aghion & Elie Cohen, 2004. "Éducation et croissance," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-03568333, HAL.
    3. Philippe Aghion & Elie Cohen, 2004. "Education et croissance," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-03571451, HAL.
    4. Philippe Aghion & Elie Cohen, 2004. "Education et croissance," Post-Print hal-03571451, HAL.
    5. Philippe Aghion & Elie Cohen, 2004. "Éducation et croissance," Post-Print hal-03568333, HAL.
    6. Tsebelis, George, 1995. "Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(3), pages 289-325, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeon, Doh-Shin & Menicucci, Domenico, 2008. "Money, fame and the allocation of talent: Brain drain and the institution of science," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 66(3-4), pages 558-581, June.
    2. Florent Kambasu Kasula, 2025. "Professionnalisation et employabilité des jeunes diplômés universitaires : un plaidoyer pour le projet professionnel et personnel de l’étudiant," Post-Print hal-05305985, HAL.
    3. Mandel Philipp & Süssmuth Bernd, 2015. "Public Education, Accountability, and Yardstick Competition in a Federal System," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 15(4), pages 1679-1703, October.
    4. Heike Klüver & Iñaki Sagarzazu, 2013. "Ideological congruency and decision-making speed: The effect of partisanship across European Union institutions," European Union Politics, , vol. 14(3), pages 388-407, September.
    5. Rifat Darina Kamal & Charles Burton, 2018. "Policy Gridlock versus Policy Shift in Gun Politics: A Comparative Veto Player Analysis of Gun Control Policies in the United States and Canada," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 181(4), pages 317-347, December.
    6. Sanjeev Gupta & João Tovar Jalles, 2020. "On the Political Economy Determinants of Tax Reforms: Evidence from Developing Countries," Policy Papers 199, Center for Global Development.
    7. André Kaiser, 1997. "Types of Democracy," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 9(4), pages 419-444, October.
    8. Alvaro Forteza & Juan S. Pereyra, 2021. "Separation of powers with ideological parties," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 33(3), pages 333-382, July.
    9. Oliver Pamp, 2008. "Partisan Preferences and Political Institutions: Explaining Fiscal Retrenchment in the European Union," European Political Economy Review, European Political Economy Infrastructure Consortium, vol. 8(Spring), pages 4-39.
    10. Jin Mun Jeong & Dursun Peksen, 2019. "Domestic Institutional Constraints, Veto Players, and Sanction Effectiveness," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(1), pages 194-217, January.
    11. repec:dgr:rugccs:200006 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Serguei Kaniovski, 2008. "The exact bias of the Banzhaf measure of power when votes are neither equiprobable nor independent," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 31(2), pages 281-300, August.
    13. Gijs Jan Brandsma & Jan Pollex & Paul Tobin, 2023. "Overlooked Yet Ongoing: Policy Termination in the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(5), pages 1360-1376, September.
    14. Carlos Scartascini & Mariano Tommasi & Ernesto Stein, 2010. "Veto Players and Policy Trade-Offs- An Intertemporal Approach to Study the Effects of Political Institutions on Policy," Research Department Publications 4660, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    15. Chris Hanretty & Christel Koop, 2013. "Shall the law set them free? The formal and actual independence of regulatory agencies," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 195-214, June.
    16. Geys, Benny, 2006. "Looking across borders: A test of spatial policy interdependence using local government efficiency ratings," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 443-462, November.
    17. Stanley L. Winer, 2016. "The Political Economy of Taxation: Power, Structure, Redistribution," Carleton Economic Papers 16-15, Carleton University, Department of Economics.
    18. Jason Webb Yackee & Susan Webb Yackee, 2009. "Divided government and US federal rulemaking," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(2), pages 128-144, June.
    19. Volkerink, Bjorn & De Haan, Jakob, 2001. "Fragmented Government Effects on Fiscal Policy: New Evidence," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 109(3-4), pages 221-242, December.
    20. Marcelin, Isaac & Stephen, Sheryl-Ann K. & Fanta, Fassil & Tecklezion, Mussie, 2019. "Political regimes, investment and electoral uncertainty," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 580-599.
    21. Fuchs, Dieter, 1997. "Kriterien demokratischer Performanz in Liberalen Demokratien," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Institutions and Social Change FS III 97-203, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb597:152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zesbrde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.