IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/roswps/128.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Investitionsbewertung unter Berücksichtigung von Umweltschutz als eigenständigem Formalziel

Author

Listed:
  • Stahl, Stefan

Abstract

In Folge der steigenden Nachfrage nach ethischen Kapitalanlagen stehen die Unternehmen vor der Herausforderung, neben den typischen monetären Zielen auch Umweltschutzziele in die Investitionsbewertung einbeziehen zu müssen. Bestehende Ansätze der Investitionsbewertung unter Berücksichtigung von Umweltschutz kombinieren klassische Investitionsrechenverfahren für die monetären Größen mit Nutzwertanalysen für die nichtmonetären Größen oder beziehen die Monetarisierung von Umweltgrößen ein. Beide Ansätze weisen Schwächen auf. Alternativ zu den bestehenden Ansätzen wird in diesem Beitrag ein Investitionsbewertungsmodell entwickelt, das Umweltschutzziele und monetäre Ziele simultan berücksichtigt. Anforderungen an ein solches Modell sind aus Investorensicht Transparenz der Investitionsentscheidung und die Möglichkeit der Gewichtung von monetären und Umweltschutzzielen. Aus Sicht der Entscheidungsträger in den Unternehmen stehen als Anforderungen eine möglichst geringe Komplexität, Lösbarkeit und ein überschaubarer Informationsbedarf des Investitionsbewertungsmodells im Vordergrund. Die Erweiterung eines Investitionsbewertungsmodells um Elemente der unscharfen linearen Programmierung ermöglicht die Berücksichtigung der Anforderungen.

Suggested Citation

  • Stahl, Stefan, 2012. "Investitionsbewertung unter Berücksichtigung von Umweltschutz als eigenständigem Formalziel," Thuenen-Series of Applied Economic Theory 128, University of Rostock, Institute of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:roswps:128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/74666/1/725718986.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heinkel, Robert & Kraus, Alan & Zechner, Josef, 2001. "The Effect of Green Investment on Corporate Behavior," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(4), pages 431-449, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jesús Manuel Palma-Ruiz & Julen Castillo-Apraiz & Raúl Gómez-Martínez, 2020. "Socially Responsible Investing as a Competitive Strategy for Trading Companies in Times of Upheaval Amid COVID-19: Evidence from Spain," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Kim, Taeyeon & Kim, Hyun-Dong & Park, Kwangwoo, 2020. "CEO inside debt holdings and CSR activities," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 508-529.
    3. Diana Pop & Caroline Marie-Jeanne & Régis Dumoulin, 2023. "Socialium or the Financial Price of Social Responsibility [« Socialium » ou le prix financier de la responsabilité sociale]," Post-Print hal-04120305, HAL.
    4. Ciciretti, Rocco & Dalò, Ambrogio & Dam, Lammertjan, 2023. "The contributions of betas versus characteristics to the ESG premium," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 104-124.
    5. Wang, Kai-Hua & Zhao, Yan-Xin & Jiang, Cui-Feng & Li, Zheng-Zheng, 2022. "Does green finance inspire sustainable development? Evidence from a global perspective," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 412-426.
    6. Thomas Kaspereit & Kerstin Lopatta, 2013. "The Value Relevance of SAM's Corporate Sustainability Ranking and GRI Sustainability Reporting in the European Stock Markets," ZenTra Working Papers in Transnational Studies 19 / 2013, ZenTra - Center for Transnational Studies, revised Oct 2013.
    7. Hui-Ching Hsieh & Viona Claresta & Thi Minh Ngoc Bui, 2020. "Green Building, Cost of Equity Capital and Corporate Governance: Evidence from US Real Estate Investment Trusts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, May.
    8. Vanwalleghem, Dieter & Mirowska, Agata, 2020. "The investor that could and would: The effect of proactive personality on sustainable investment choice," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    9. Ferriani, Fabrizio, 2023. "Issuing bonds during the Covid-19 pandemic: Was there an ESG premium?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    10. Renström, Thomas I. & Spataro, Luca & Marsiliani, Laura, 2019. "Optimal Taxation, Environment Quality, Socially Responsible Firms and Investors," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 13(3-4), pages 339-373, September.
    11. Stefano Ramelli & Alexander F Wagner & Richard J Zeckhauser & Alexandre Ziegler, 2021. "Investor Rewards to Climate Responsibility: Stock-Price Responses to the Opposite Shocks of the 2016 and 2020 U.S. Elections [Asset pricing with liquidity risk]," The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 10(4), pages 748-787.
    12. Niszczota, Paweł & Białek, Michał, 2021. "Women oppose sin stocks more than men do," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    13. Xiao, He, 2022. "Environmental regulation and firm capital structure dynamics," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 770-787.
    14. Larcker, David F. & Watts, Edward M., 2020. "Where's the greenium?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2).
    15. Forest L. Reinhardt & Robert N. Stavins & Richard H. K. Vietor, 2008. "Corporate Social Responsibility Through an Economic Lens," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 2(2), pages 219-239, Summer.
    16. Stefan Ambec & Paul Lanoie, 2007. "When and Why Does It Pay To Be Green?," CIRANO Working Papers 2007s-20, CIRANO.
    17. Azmi, Wajahat & Hassan, M. Kabir & Houston, Reza & Karim, Mohammad Sydul, 2021. "ESG activities and banking performance: International evidence from emerging economies," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    18. Massimo Mariani & Fabio Pizzutilo & Alessandra Caragnano & Marianna Zito, 2021. "Does it pay to be environmentally responsible? Investigating the effect on the weighted average cost of capital: Environmental commitment and the cost of capital," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1854-1869, November.
    19. Krüger, Philipp, 2015. "Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 304-329.
    20. Bai Xue & Zhuang Zhang & Pingli Li, 2020. "Corporate environmental performance, environmental management and firm risk," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1074-1096, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Investitionstheorie; Umweltschutz; ethisches Investment; Lineare Optimierung; unscharfe Lineare Optimierung; Investment theory; environmental protection; ethical investment; linear programming; fuzzy linear programming;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G31 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Capital Budgeting; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:roswps:128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ivrosde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.