IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mlucee/307126.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Schwierigkeiten (mit) einer Tugendethik des Marktes: Theoriestrategische Überlegungen aus ordonomischer Sicht

Author

Listed:
  • Pies, Ingo

Abstract

Die Tugendethik hat Schwierigkeiten, und sie macht Schwierigkeiten. Beides hängt zusammen. Die Tugendethik macht extern Schwierigkeiten, weil sie intern Schwierigkeiten hat. Sie ist dort manifest marktfeindlich, wo sie falsch denkt. Mehr noch: Die internen und dann auch die externen Schwierigkeiten der Tugendethik lassen sich durch eine robustere Situierung ihres Theorieprogramms beheben. Eine solche Situierung umfasst zwei Aspekte: der erste betrifft die zeitdiagnostische Verortung der Tugendethik, der zweite ihre theoriestrategische Selbstreflexion (und Selbstbescheidung). Eine Tugendethik, die dies beherzigt, könnte gemeinsam mit der Ordnungsethik daran arbeiten, dem Moralparadoxon der Moderne entgegenzuwirken.

Suggested Citation

  • Pies, Ingo, 2024. "Schwierigkeiten (mit) einer Tugendethik des Marktes: Theoriestrategische Überlegungen aus ordonomischer Sicht," Discussion Papers 2024-06, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:307126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/307126/1/1908413832.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pies, Ingo, 2013. "Theoretische Grundlagen demokratischer Wirtschafts- und Gesellschaftspolitik: Der Beitrag von John Maynard Keynes," Discussion Papers 2013-16, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    2. Satz, Debra, 2010. "Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195311594, Decembrie.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ian Loader & Adam White, 2017. "How can we better align private security with the public interest? Towards a civilizing model of regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 166-184, June.
    2. Marc Fleurbaey & Ravi Kanbur & Dennis Snower, 2025. "Efficiency and equity in a socially-embedded economy," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 79(1), pages 1-56, February.
    3. Gregory J. Robson, 2023. "How to Object to the Profit System (and How Not To)," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(2), pages 205-219, November.
    4. Bjorn Bartling & Ernst Fehr & Yagiz ozdemir, 2023. "Does Market Interaction Erode Moral Values?," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 105(1), pages 226-235, January.
    5. Nicolás Maloberti, 2019. "Markets in votes: Alienability, strict secrecy, and political clientelism," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 18(2), pages 193-215, May.
    6. Piotr Dworczak & Scott Duke Kominers & Mohammad Akbarpour, 2021. "Redistribution Through Markets," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(4), pages 1665-1698, July.
    7. Louis-Philippe Hodgson, 2018. "Cohen’s community," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 17(1), pages 23-50, February.
    8. Juri Viehoff, 2019. "Equality of Opportunity in a European Social Market Economy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 28-43, January.
    9. Benistant, Julien & Galeotti, Fabio & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2022. "Competition, information, and the erosion of morals," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 148-163.
    10. Natalie Gold, 2019. "The limits of commodification arguments: Framing, motivation crowding, and shared valuations," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 18(2), pages 165-192, May.
    11. Jared L. Peifer & David R. Johnson & Elaine Howard Ecklund, 2019. "The Moral Limits of the Market: Science Commercialization and Religious Traditions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 183-197, June.
    12. Akyel, Dominic, 2014. "Ökonomisierung und moralischer Wandel: Die Ausweitung von Marktbeziehungen als Prozess der moralischen Bewertung von Gütern," MPIfG Discussion Paper 14/13, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    13. Steven J. Bosworth & Dennis J. Snower, 2019. "The Interplay of Economic, Social and Political Fragmentation," CESifo Working Paper Series 7935, CESifo.
    14. Choi, Ginny Seung & Storr, Virgil Henry, 2023. "The morality of markets in theory and empirics," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 590-607.
    15. David Peña-Rangel, 2022. "Political equality, plural voting, and the leveling down objection," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 21(2), pages 122-164, May.
    16. Rachel Glennerster & Seema Jayachandran, 2023. "Think Globally, Act Globally: Opportunities to Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 37(3), pages 111-136, Summer.
    17. Rob Garnett, 2023. "The moral ambiguity of the invisible hand," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 36(1), pages 115-123, March.
    18. Mathias Dewatripont & Jean Tirole, 2022. "The Morality of Markets," Working Papers ECARES 2022-35, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    19. Viola S. Ackfeld, 2020. "The Aversion to Monetary Incentives for Changing Behavior," Working Paper Series in Economics 100, University of Cologne, Department of Economics.
    20. Neuteleers, Stijn & Engelen, Bart, 2015. "Talking money: How market-based valuation can undermine environmental protection," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 253-260.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Entfremdung; Ordonomik; Individualethik; Tugendethik; Ordnungsethik; Mismatch; Moralparadoxon der Moderne; Alienation; Ordonomics; Individual Ethics; Virtue Ethics; Order Ethics; Moral Paradox of Modernity;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:307126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wwhalde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.