IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mlucee/20114.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Haftung und Innovation: Ordonomische Überlegungen zur Aktualisierung der ordnungspolitischen Konzeption

Author

Listed:
  • Pies, Ingo
  • Sass, Peter

Abstract

Dieser Beitrag wirft einen kritischen Blick auf die maßgeblich von Walter Eucken in den 1930er und 1940er Jahren ausgearbeitete ordnungspolitische Konzeption. Aus heutiger Sicht und insbesondere aus der Theorieperspektive des ordonomischen Forschungsprogramms werden zwei Defizite diagnostiziert: Der ordnungspolitischen Konzeption mangelt es erstens an einer explizit wachstumspolitischen Ausrichtung. Zweitens vertritt sie im Hinblick auf Haftungsfragen eine Radikalposition, die korrekturbedürftig ist. Dieser Beitrag erläutert, wie sich beide Defizite beheben lassen: Im Zuge einer Aktualisierung der ordnungspolitischen Konzeption werden ordonomische Überlegungen entwickelt, wie man Haftung und Innovation für nachhaltiges Wachstum durch geeignete Rahmenbedingungen fördern kann.

Suggested Citation

  • Pies, Ingo & Sass, Peter, 2011. "Haftung und Innovation: Ordonomische Überlegungen zur Aktualisierung der ordnungspolitischen Konzeption," Discussion Papers 2011-4, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:20114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/170341/1/dp2011-04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert M. Solow, 1956. "A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 70(1), pages 65-94.
    2. Baumol, William J., 1996. "Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 3-22, January.
    3. Thanassoulis John, 2009. "Now Is the Right Time to Regulate Bankers' Pay," The Economists' Voice, De Gruyter, vol. 6(5), pages 1-4, April.
    4. William J. Baumol, 2013. "The Microtheory of Innovative Entrepreneurship," Journal of Economic Sociology, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(3), pages 96-108.
    5. Pies, Ingo, 2001. "Eucken und von Hayek im Vergleich," Untersuchungen zur Ordnungstheorie und Ordnungspolitik, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen;Walter Eucken Institut, Freiburg, Germany, edition 1, volume 43, number urn:isbn:9783161476365, September.
    6. Pies, Ingo, 2011. "Walter Eucken als Klassiker der Ordnungsethik: Eine ordonomische Rekonstruktion," Discussion Papers 2011-3, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Will, Matthias Georg, 2011. "Technologischer Fortschritt und Vertrauen: Gefahrenproduktivität und Bindungsmechanismen zur Überwindung von Konflikten," Discussion Papers 2011-19, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    2. Thießen Friedrich, 2020. "Die Empfehlungen des Fintech-Rates zur Regulierung von Blockchains im Lichte ungeklärter Fragen der Haftung," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 69(2), pages 166-198, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pies Ingo & Sass Peter, 2011. "Wie sollte die Managementvergütung (nicht) reguliert werden? – Ordnungspolitische Überlegungen zur Haftungsbeschränkung von und in Organisationen / How Managerial Compensation Should (not) be Regulate," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 62(1), pages 231-268, January.
    2. Pies, Ingo & Sass, Peter, 2011. "Wie sollte die Managementvergütung (nicht) reguliert werden? Ordnungspolitische Überlegungen zur Haftungsbeschränkung von und in Organisationen," Discussion Papers 2011-2, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    3. Pies, Ingo, 2021. "Kapitalismus als System zur Verwirklichung moralischer Anliegen - Ordonomische Denkanstöße," Discussion Papers 2021-01, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    4. Marcus Box & Karl Gratzer & Xiang Lin, 2020. "Destructive entrepreneurship in the small business sector: bankruptcy fraud in Sweden, 1830–2010," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 437-457, February.
    5. Elert, Niklas & Henrekson, Magnus, 2017. "Entrepreneurship and Institutions: A Bidirectional Relationship," Working Paper Series 1153, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 05 May 2017.
    6. Olsson, Ola, 2001. "Why Does Technology Advance in Cycles?," Working Papers in Economics 38, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    7. Francesco Quatraro & Marco Vivarelli, 2015. "Drivers of Entrepreneurship and Post-entry Performance of Newborn Firms in Developing Countries," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 30(2), pages 277-305.
    8. Kim, Jungsuk & Castillejos-Petalcorin, Cynthia & Jinjarak, Yothin & Park, Donghyun & Quising, Pilipinas & Tian, Shu, 2022. "Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: A Cross-Sectional Analysis Perspective," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 672, Asian Development Bank.
    9. Jones Charles I., 2001. "Was an Industrial Revolution Inevitable? Economic Growth Over the Very Long Run," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 1-45, August.
    10. Elert, Niklas & Henrekson, Magnus & Stenkula, Mikael, 2017. "Institutional Reform for Innovation and Entrepreneurship: An Agenda for Europe," Working Paper Series 1150, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 16 Feb 2017.
    11. Alfredo Monte & Sara Moccia & Luca Pennacchio, 2022. "Regional entrepreneurship and innovation: historical roots and the impact on the growth of regions," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 451-473, January.
    12. Brixiová, Zuzana & Ncube, Mthuli & Bicaba, Zorobabel, 2015. "Skills and Youth Entrepreneurship in Africa: Analysis with Evidence from Swaziland," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 11-26.
    13. Rajeev Goel & Devrim Göktepe-Hultén, 2013. "Nascent entrepreneurship and inventive activity: a somewhat new perspective," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 471-485, August.
    14. Mayer-Haug, Katrin & Read, Stuart & Brinckmann, Jan & Dew, Nicholas & Grichnik, Dietmar, 2013. "Entrepreneurial talent and venture performance: A meta-analytic investigation of SMEs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 1251-1273.
    15. Maloney,William F. & Zambrano,Andrés, 2021. "Learning to Learn : Experimentation, Entrepreneurial Capital, and Development," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9890, The World Bank.
    16. Folorunsho M. Ajide & Rufus A. Ajisafe & Olabode P. Olofin, 2019. "Capital Controls, Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth in Selected Developing Countries," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(2), pages 191-212, February.
    17. Natkhov, T. & Polishchuk, L., 2017. "Political Economy of Institutions and Development: The Importance of Being Inclusive. Reflection on "Why Nations Fail" by D. Acemoglu and J. Robinson. Part I. Institutions and Economic Devel," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 34(2), pages 12-38.
    18. Sylwia Zajączkowska-Jakimiak, 2006. "Wiedza techniczna i kapitał ludzki w teorii wzrostu gospodarczego," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 11-12, pages 47-69.
    19. Elert, Niklas & Henrekson, Magnus, 2021. "Innovative Entrepreneurship as a Collaborative Effort: An Institutional Framework," Foundations and Trends(R) in Entrepreneurship, now publishers, vol. 17(4), pages 330-435, June.
    20. Maloney, William F. & Valencia Caicedo, Felipe, 2014. "Engineers, Innovative Capacity and Development in the Americas," IZA Discussion Papers 8271, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:20114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wwhalde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.