IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/koncil/26.html

Komplementäre Standortentscheidungen und die räumliche Verteilung der Produktion

Author

Listed:
  • Büttner, Thiess

Abstract

Verschiedene Verbindungen zwischen lokalen Kapitaleinheiten können Komplementaritäten in den Standortentscheidungen begründen: Skalenerträge und Spillovereffekte, Input- Output-Beziehungen bei Transportkosten und EinkommenskreislaufefTekte. In einem stilisierten Modell wird ihr simultaner Einfluß auf die Rendite lokalen Kapitals untersucht. Anschließend werden die Konsequenzen für die räumliche Verteilung der Produktion diskutiert. Anhand einer Zeitpunktaufnahme der Verteilung der Beschäftigung im Verarbeitenden Gewerbe in den alten Ländern der Bundesrepublik wird dann die Bedeutung für die empirische Verteilung der Produktion analysiert. Zwar können die Gründe für die Komplementaritäten anhand des Datenmaterials nur unvollständig getrennt werden, dennoch zeigt sich eine signifikante Erklärungskraft des theoretischen Modells für die räumliche Verteilung der Produktion.

Suggested Citation

  • Büttner, Thiess, 1995. "Komplementäre Standortentscheidungen und die räumliche Verteilung der Produktion," Discussion Papers 26, University of Konstanz, Center for International Labor Economics (CILE).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:koncil:26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/92449/1/717200116.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Franz, Wolfgang & Schalk, Hans J., 1994. "Eine kritische Würdigung der Wirksamkeit der regionalen Investitionsförderung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland," Discussion Papers 17, University of Konstanz, Center for International Labor Economics (CILE).
    2. Herberg, Horst & Kemp, Murray C. & Tawada, Makota, 1982. "Further implications of variable returns to scale," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1-2), pages 65-84, August.
    3. Steven Brakman & Harry Garretsen, 1993. "The Relevance of Initial Conditions for the German Unification," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 163-181, May.
    4. Dixit, Avinash K & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1977. "Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 67(3), pages 297-308, June.
    5. Henderson, J. Vernon, 1987. "General equilibrium modeling of systems of cities," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: E. S. Mills (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 23, pages 927-956, Elsevier.
    6. Beckmann, Martin J. & Thisse, Jacques-Francois, 1987. "The location of production activities," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: P. Nijkamp (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 2, pages 21-95, Elsevier.
    7. Breuel, Birgit & Necker, Tyll & Späth, Lothar & Donges, Juergen B., 1993. "Erhaltung industrieller Kerne in Ostdeutschland?," Wirtschaftsdienst – Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik (1949 - 2007), ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 73(2), pages 59-70.
    8. Davidson, Russell & MacKinnon, James G., 1993. "Estimation and Inference in Econometrics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195060119.
    9. repec:bla:kyklos:v:46:y:1993:i:2:p:163-81 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Helpman, Elhanan, 1984. "Increasing returns, imperfect markets, and trade theory," Handbook of International Economics, in: R. W. Jones & P. B. Kenen (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 7, pages 325-365, Elsevier.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dekle, Robert & Eaton, Jonathan, 1999. "Agglomeration and Land Rents: Evidence from the Prefectures," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 200-214, September.
    2. Robert Dekle & Jonathan Eaton, 1994. "Agglomertion and the Price of Land: Evidence from the Prefectures," Boston University - Institute for Economic Development 47, Boston University, Institute for Economic Development.
    3. repec:ctc:serie1:def11 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Kraft, Kornelius, 2018. "Productivity and distribution effects of codetermination in an efficient bargaining model," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 458-485.
    5. Kanda Naknoi, 2008. "Tariffs and the Expansion of the American Pig Iron Industry, 1870-1940," Purdue University Economics Working Papers 1214, Purdue University, Department of Economics.
    6. Michael C. Burda & Barbara Dluhosch, 2002. "Fragmentation, Globalisation and Labour Markets," International Economic Association Series, in: David Greenaway & Richard Upward & Katharine Wakelin (ed.), Trade, Investment, Migration and Labour Market Adjustment, chapter 4, pages 47-65, Palgrave Macmillan.
    7. Chian-Yue Wang & Robert Haining, 2017. "Testing the new economic geography’s wage equation: a case study of Japan using a spatial panel model," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 58(3), pages 417-440, May.
    8. Assenza, Tiziana & Grazzini, Jakob & Hommes, Cars & Massaro, Domenico, 2015. "PQ strategies in monopolistic competition: Some insights from the lab," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 62-77.
    9. Maxim Goryunov & Sergey Kokovin & Takatoshi Tabuchi, 2022. "Continuous spatial monopolistic competition: matching goods with consumers," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 74(3), pages 793-832, October.
    10. Huiwen Lai & Daniel Trefler, 2002. "The Gains from Trade with Monopolistic Competition: Specification, Estimation, and Mis-Specification," NBER Working Papers 9169, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Joseph F. Francois & Douglas Nelson, 2002. "A Geometry Of Specialisation," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 112(481), pages 649-678, July.
    12. Rauscher, Michael, 2001. "International trade, foreign investment, and the environment," Thuenen-Series of Applied Economic Theory 29, University of Rostock, Institute of Economics.
    13. Kuuluvainen, Jari & Korhonen, Jaana & Wang, Lanhui & Toppinen, Anne, 2021. "Wood market cartel in Finland 1997–2004: Analyzing price effects using the indicator approach," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    14. Kondo, Hiroki, 2004. "Multiple growth and urbanization patterns in an endogenous growth model with spatial agglomeration," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 167-199, October.
    15. Knaap, T., 1998. "A survey of complementaries in growth and location theories," Research Report 98C44, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    16. Benassy, Jean-Pascal, 1996. "Taste for variety and optimum production patterns in monopolistic competition," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 41-47, July.
    17. Büttner, Thiess, 1994. "The new Laender as an industry location in unified Germany," Discussion Papers 16, University of Konstanz, Center for International Labor Economics (CILE).
    18. Cecile Batisse & Sandra Poncet, 2004. "Protectionism and Industry Location in Chinese Provinces," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 133-154.
    19. Michael C. Burda & Barbara Dluhosch, 2002. "Cost Competition, Fragmentation, and Globalization," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(3), pages 424-441, August.
    20. Armando Pires, 2006. "Estimating Krugman’s Economic Geography Model for the Spanish Regions," Spanish Economic Review, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 8(2), pages 83-112, June.
    21. Dumont, Michel, 2004. "The Impact of International Trade with Newly Industrialised Countries on the Wages and Employment of Low-Skilled and High-Skilled Workers in the European Union," Thesis Commons bmxag, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:koncil:26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwkonde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.