IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/iwhonl/12012.html

Evaluierung des BMWi-Programms „FuE-Förderung gemeinnütziger externer Industrieforschungseinrichtungen Ostdeutschlands – Innovationskompetenz Ost (INNO-KOM-Ost)“ einschließlich des Modellvorhabens Investitionszuschuss technische Infrastruktur. Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Technologie (BMWi)

Author

Listed:
  • Günther, Jutta
  • Nulsch, Nicole
  • Lang, Cornelia
  • Schwartz, Michael
  • Hornych, Christoph
  • Rammer, Christian
  • Hud, Martin
  • Schliessler, Paula

Abstract

Das im vorliegenden Gutachten evaluierte Programm zur „Förderung gemeinnütziger externer Industrieforschungseinrichtungen in Ostdeutschland – Innovationskompetenz Ost (INNO-KOM-Ost)“ trat am 1. Januar 2009 in Kraft. Das Förderprogramm INNO-KOM-Ost hat das Ziel, durch Unterstützung der innovativen Leistungsfähigkeit der externen Industrieforschungseinrichtungen (IFE) die Innovationskraft der ostdeutschen Wirtschaft nachhaltig zu stärken. Durch die diskriminierungsfreie Bereitstellung der Forschungs- und Entwicklungsergebnisse für die Allgemeinheit soll insbesondere die Innovationsfähigkeit von kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen (KMU) verbessert werden. Der industrielle Sektor im Osten Deutschlands weist im Vergleich zu den Alten Ländern noch immer einen spürbaren Nachholbedarf auf. Vor allem gibt es infolge der Transformation bisher nur wenige Großunternehmen bzw. Unternehmenszentralen in Ostdeutschland, sodass die Industrieforschung hauptsächlich in KMU stattfindet. Die IFE spielen deshalb als FuE-Dienstleister und Transformatoren marktorientierten Wissens eine wichtige Rolle für die Innovationsaktivitäten und damit die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der ostdeutschen KMU. IFE sind zugleich oft Initiatoren und Moderatoren von innovativen Netzwerken, die weit über die jeweilige Region hinaus wirken.

Suggested Citation

  • Günther, Jutta & Nulsch, Nicole & Lang, Cornelia & Schwartz, Michael & Hornych, Christoph & Rammer, Christian & Hud, Martin & Schliessler, Paula, 2012. "Evaluierung des BMWi-Programms „FuE-Förderung gemeinnütziger externer Industrieforschungseinrichtungen Ostdeutschlands – Innovationskompetenz Ost (INNO-KOM-Ost)“ einschließlich des Modellvorhabens Investitionszuschuss technische Infrastruktur. Studie," IWH Online 1/2012, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iwhonl:12012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/142188/1/io_2012-01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Romer, Paul M, 1986. "Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(5), pages 1002-1037, October.
    2. Günther, Jutta & Nulsch, Nicole & Urban-Thielicke, Dana & Wilde, Katja, 2010. "20 Jahre nach dem Mauerfall: Transformation und Erneuerung des ostdeutschen Innovationssystems," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 16-2010, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    3. Günther, Jutta & Dominguez-Lacasa, Iciar & Nulsch, Nicole & Schwartz, Michael & Slavtchev, Viktor & Titze, Mirko & Wilde, Katja, 2010. "Evaluierung des Programms des Sächsischen Staatsministeriums für Wissenschaft und Kunst (SMWK) zur Förderung von Projekten im Forschungsbereich," IWH-Sonderhefte 1/2010, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    4. Alexander Eickelpasch & Heike Belitz & Anna Lejpras & Herbert Berteit & Gerd Walter & Kathleen Toepel, 2010. "Bedeutung von FuE für die Entwicklung des verarbeitenden Gewerbes in Ostdeutschland und Wirkungen der technologieoffenen Programme zur Förderung der Industrieforschung: Endbericht; Forschungsprojekt im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft un," DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, volume 58, number pbk58.
    5. Günther, Jutta & Michelsen, Claus & Peglow, François & Titze, Mirko & Fritsch, Michael & Noseleit, F. & Schröter, A., 2008. "Evaluierung der FuE-Projektförderung des Sächsischen Staatsministeriums für Wirtschaft und Arbeit: Endbericht," IWH-Sonderhefte 3/2008, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    6. Romer, Paul M, 1990. "Endogenous Technological Change," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(5), pages 71-102, October.
    7. Dominique Guellec & Bruno Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, 2003. "The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 225-243.
    8. Heimpold, Gerhard, 2012. "Aktuelle Trends: Industriebetriebe in den Neuen Ländern 2011: Kleiner und nach wie vor weniger exportintensiv als ihre westdeutschen Pendants," Wirtschaft im Wandel, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH), vol. 18(5), pages 151-151.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ihle, Dorothee & Meurer, Petra & Stolz, Christopher, 2020. "Entwicklung des Innovationsstandortes Ostdeutschland: Eine Analyse der FuE- und Patentaktivitäten, der Gründungen sowie der F&I-Förderung," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 10-2020, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brautzsch, Hans-Ulrich & Günther, Jutta & Loose, Brigitte & Ludwig, Udo & Nulsch, Nicole, 2015. "Can R&D subsidies counteract the economic crisis? – Macroeconomic effects in Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 623-633.
    2. Bettina Becker, 2013. "The Determinants of R&D Investment: A Survey of the Empirical Research," Discussion Paper Series 2013_09, Department of Economics, Loughborough University, revised Sep 2013.
    3. Pop Silaghi, Monica Ioana & Alexa, Diana & Jude, Cristina & Litan, Cristian, 2014. "Do business and public sector research and development expenditures contribute to economic growth in Central and Eastern European Countries? A dynamic panel estimation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 108-119.
    4. Simon Wiederhold, 2012. "The Role of Public Procurement in Innovation: Theory and Empirical Evidence," ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 43, April.
    5. Bettina Becker, 2015. "Public R&D Policies And Private R&D Investment: A Survey Of The Empirical Evidence," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 917-942, December.
    6. Ejike Udeogu & Shampa Roy-Mukherjee & Uzochukwu Amakom, 2021. "Does Increasing Product Complexity and Diversity Cause Economic Growth in the Long-Run? A GMM Panel VAR Evidence," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    7. Vinko Kandzija & Marko Tomljanovic & Tomislav Kandzija, 2020. "Innovations and Economic Growth in Romania - Current State and Perspectives," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Ioana PANAGORET & Gabriel GORGHIU (ed.), International Conference Globalization, Innovation and Development. Trends and Prospects (G.I.D.T.P.), edition 1, volume 10, chapter 14, pages 116-125, Editura Lumen.
    8. Blum, Ulrich & Brachert, Matthias & Brautzsch, Hans-Ulrich & Brenke, Karl & Buscher, Herbert & Dietrich, Diemo & Dürig, Wolfgang & Franz, Peter & Günther, Jutta & Haug, Peter & Kauffmann, Albrecht & K, 2011. "Wirtschaftlicher Stand und Perspektiven für Ostdeutschland: Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums des Innern," IWH-Sonderhefte 2/2011, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    9. Bonte, Werner, 2004. "Spillovers from publicly financed business R&D: some empirical evidence from Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1635-1655, December.
    10. repec:ilo:ilowps:366690 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Heijs, Joost, 2003. "Freerider behaviour and the public finance of R&D activities in enterprises: the case of the Spanish low interest credits for R&D," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 445-461, March.
    12. Kawalec Paweł, 2020. "The dynamics of theories of economic growth: An impact of Unified Growth Theory," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 6(2), pages 19-44, June.
    13. Kumar, Sanjesh & Singh, Baljeet, 2019. "Barriers to the international diffusion of technological innovations," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 74-86.
    14. repec:rza:wpaper:029 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Luis Garicano & Thomas N. Hubbard, 2016. "The Returns to Knowledge Hierarchies," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 32(4), pages 653-684.
    16. Blomström, Magnus & Kokko, Ari, 2003. "Human Capital and Inward FDI," CEPR Discussion Papers 3762, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    17. Panagiotis Pegkas & Constantinos Tsamadias, 2017. "Are There Separate Effects of Male and Female Higher Education on Economic Growth? Evidence from Greece," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(1), pages 279-293, March.
    18. repec:diw:diwwpp:dp320 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Saima Javed & Yu Rong & Hafiz Muhammad Ihsan Zafeer & Samra Maqbool & Babar Nawaz Abbasi, 2024. "Unleashing the potential: a quest to understand and examine the factors enriching research and innovation productivities of South Asian universities," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    20. Bakari, Sayef, 2021. "Do researchers affect economic growth?," MPRA Paper 108788, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. I. Hakan Yetkiner, 2006. "Saglik ile Buyume," Ege Academic Review, Ege University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 6(2), pages 83-91.
    22. Mark Knell & Simone Vannuccini, 2022. "Tools and concepts for understanding disruptive technological change after Schumpeter," Jena Economics Research Papers 2022-005, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    23. Christoph Meister & Bart Verspagen & Guntram B. Wolff, 2006. "European Productivity Gaps: Is R&D the Solution?," Chapters, in: Susanne Mundschenk & Michael H. Stierle & Ulrike Stierle-von Schütz & Iulia Traistaru-Siedschlag (ed.), Competitiveness and Growth in Europe, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iwhonl:12012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwhhhde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.