IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/iwhonl/12012.html

Evaluierung des BMWi-Programms „FuE-Förderung gemeinnütziger externer Industrieforschungseinrichtungen Ostdeutschlands – Innovationskompetenz Ost (INNO-KOM-Ost)“ einschließlich des Modellvorhabens Investitionszuschuss technische Infrastruktur. Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Technologie (BMWi)

Author

Listed:
  • Günther, Jutta
  • Nulsch, Nicole
  • Lang, Cornelia
  • Schwartz, Michael
  • Hornych, Christoph
  • Rammer, Christian
  • Hud, Martin
  • Schliessler, Paula

Abstract

Das im vorliegenden Gutachten evaluierte Programm zur „Förderung gemeinnütziger externer Industrieforschungseinrichtungen in Ostdeutschland – Innovationskompetenz Ost (INNO-KOM-Ost)“ trat am 1. Januar 2009 in Kraft. Das Förderprogramm INNO-KOM-Ost hat das Ziel, durch Unterstützung der innovativen Leistungsfähigkeit der externen Industrieforschungseinrichtungen (IFE) die Innovationskraft der ostdeutschen Wirtschaft nachhaltig zu stärken. Durch die diskriminierungsfreie Bereitstellung der Forschungs- und Entwicklungsergebnisse für die Allgemeinheit soll insbesondere die Innovationsfähigkeit von kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen (KMU) verbessert werden. Der industrielle Sektor im Osten Deutschlands weist im Vergleich zu den Alten Ländern noch immer einen spürbaren Nachholbedarf auf. Vor allem gibt es infolge der Transformation bisher nur wenige Großunternehmen bzw. Unternehmenszentralen in Ostdeutschland, sodass die Industrieforschung hauptsächlich in KMU stattfindet. Die IFE spielen deshalb als FuE-Dienstleister und Transformatoren marktorientierten Wissens eine wichtige Rolle für die Innovationsaktivitäten und damit die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der ostdeutschen KMU. IFE sind zugleich oft Initiatoren und Moderatoren von innovativen Netzwerken, die weit über die jeweilige Region hinaus wirken.

Suggested Citation

  • Günther, Jutta & Nulsch, Nicole & Lang, Cornelia & Schwartz, Michael & Hornych, Christoph & Rammer, Christian & Hud, Martin & Schliessler, Paula, 2012. "Evaluierung des BMWi-Programms „FuE-Förderung gemeinnütziger externer Industrieforschungseinrichtungen Ostdeutschlands – Innovationskompetenz Ost (INNO-KOM-Ost)“ einschließlich des Modellvorhabens Investitionszuschuss technische Infrastruktur. Studie," IWH Online 1/2012, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iwhonl:12012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/142188/1/io_2012-01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Romer, Paul M, 1986. "Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(5), pages 1002-1037, October.
    2. Günther, Jutta & Nulsch, Nicole & Urban-Thielicke, Dana & Wilde, Katja, 2010. "20 Jahre nach dem Mauerfall: Transformation und Erneuerung des ostdeutschen Innovationssystems," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 16-2010, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    3. Günther, Jutta & Dominguez-Lacasa, Iciar & Nulsch, Nicole & Schwartz, Michael & Slavtchev, Viktor & Titze, Mirko & Wilde, Katja, 2010. "Evaluierung des Programms des Sächsischen Staatsministeriums für Wissenschaft und Kunst (SMWK) zur Förderung von Projekten im Forschungsbereich," IWH-Sonderhefte 1/2010, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    4. Alexander Eickelpasch & Heike Belitz & Anna Lejpras & Herbert Berteit & Gerd Walter & Kathleen Toepel, 2010. "Bedeutung von FuE für die Entwicklung des verarbeitenden Gewerbes in Ostdeutschland und Wirkungen der technologieoffenen Programme zur Förderung der Industrieforschung: Endbericht; Forschungsprojekt im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft un," DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, volume 58, number pbk58.
    5. Günther, Jutta & Michelsen, Claus & Peglow, François & Titze, Mirko & Fritsch, Michael & Noseleit, F. & Schröter, A., 2008. "Evaluierung der FuE-Projektförderung des Sächsischen Staatsministeriums für Wirtschaft und Arbeit: Endbericht," IWH-Sonderhefte 3/2008, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    6. Romer, Paul M, 1990. "Endogenous Technological Change," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(5), pages 71-102, October.
    7. Dominique Guellec & Bruno Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, 2003. "The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 225-243.
    8. Heimpold, Gerhard, 2012. "Aktuelle Trends: Industriebetriebe in den Neuen Ländern 2011: Kleiner und nach wie vor weniger exportintensiv als ihre westdeutschen Pendants," Wirtschaft im Wandel, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH), vol. 18(5), pages 151-151.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ihle, Dorothee & Meurer, Petra & Stolz, Christopher, 2020. "Entwicklung des Innovationsstandortes Ostdeutschland: Eine Analyse der FuE- und Patentaktivitäten, der Gründungen sowie der F&I-Förderung," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 10-2020, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brautzsch, Hans-Ulrich & Günther, Jutta & Loose, Brigitte & Ludwig, Udo & Nulsch, Nicole, 2015. "Can R&D subsidies counteract the economic crisis? – Macroeconomic effects in Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 623-633.
    2. Pop Silaghi, Monica Ioana & Alexa, Diana & Jude, Cristina & Litan, Cristian, 2014. "Do business and public sector research and development expenditures contribute to economic growth in Central and Eastern European Countries? A dynamic panel estimation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 108-119.
    3. Simon Wiederhold, 2012. "The Role of Public Procurement in Innovation: Theory and Empirical Evidence," ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 43.
    4. Bettina Becker, 2015. "Public R&D Policies And Private R&D Investment: A Survey Of The Empirical Evidence," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 917-942, December.
    5. Ejike Udeogu & Shampa Roy-Mukherjee & Uzochukwu Amakom, 2021. "Does Increasing Product Complexity and Diversity Cause Economic Growth in the Long-Run? A GMM Panel VAR Evidence," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    6. Vinko Kandzija & Marko Tomljanovic & Tomislav Kandzija, 2020. "Innovations and Economic Growth in Romania - Current State and Perspectives," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Ioana PANAGORET & Gabriel GORGHIU (ed.), International Conference Globalization, Innovation and Development. Trends and Prospects (G.I.D.T.P.), edition 1, volume 10, chapter 14, pages 116-125, Editura Lumen.
    7. Bettina Becker, 2013. "The Determinants of R&D Investment: A Survey of the Empirical Research," Discussion Paper Series 2013_09, Department of Economics, Loughborough University, revised Sep 2013.
    8. Blum, Ulrich & Brachert, Matthias & Brautzsch, Hans-Ulrich & Brenke, Karl & Buscher, Herbert & Dietrich, Diemo & Dürig, Wolfgang & Franz, Peter & Günther, Jutta & Haug, Peter & Kauffmann, Albrecht & K, 2011. "Wirtschaftlicher Stand und Perspektiven für Ostdeutschland: Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums des Innern," IWH-Sonderhefte 2/2011, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    9. Bonte, Werner, 2004. "Spillovers from publicly financed business R&D: some empirical evidence from Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1635-1655, December.
    10. Abida Hafeez & Karim Bux Shah Syed & Fiza Qureshi, 2019. "Exploring the Relationship between Government R & D Expenditures and Economic Growth in a Global Perspective: A PMG Estimation Approach," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(4), pages 163-174, April.
    11. repec:ilo:ilowps:366690 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Heijs, Joost, 2003. "Freerider behaviour and the public finance of R&D activities in enterprises: the case of the Spanish low interest credits for R&D," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 445-461, March.
    13. Boucekkine, Raouf & del Rio, Fernando & Licandro, Omar, 2005. "Obsolescence and modernization in the growth process," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 153-171, June.
    14. Hui Yang & Jingye Li & Stefan Sieber & Kaisheng Long, 2025. "Does Digital Village Construction Affect the Sustainable Intensification of Cultivated Land Use? Evidence from Rural China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-24, April.
    15. Kawalec Paweł, 2020. "The dynamics of theories of economic growth: An impact of Unified Growth Theory," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 6(2), pages 19-44, June.
    16. Schreiner, Lena & Madlener, Reinhard, 2022. "Investing in power grid infrastructure as a flexibility option: A DSGE assessment for Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    17. Antonio Ciccone & Giovanni Peri & Douglas Almond, "undated". "Capital, Wages, and Growth: Theory and Evidence," Working Papers 152, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    18. Kumar, Sanjesh & Singh, Baljeet, 2019. "Barriers to the international diffusion of technological innovations," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 74-86.
    19. Carine Nourry, 2012. "Dasgupta, D.: Modern growth theory," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 105(1), pages 97-100, January.
    20. Stefano Zambelli & N. Dharmaraj, 2013. ""Carry-on-Activity" and Process Innovation," ASSRU Discussion Papers 1306, ASSRU - Algorithmic Social Science Research Unit.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iwhonl:12012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwhhhde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.