IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/iubhhr/306367.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Kognitive Dissonanz in der BANI-Wirtschaft: Strategien zur Bewältigung von Spannungen in der aktuellen Arbeitswelt

Author

Listed:
  • Dulgeridis, Marcel
  • Schattenberg, Lisa
  • Schattenberg, Christian

Abstract

This paper delves into the increasing difficulties posed by dissonance, in the BANI (Brittle Anxious Nonlinear Incomprehensible) business setting. Cognitive dissonance refers to a clash stemming from beliefs or actions and is on the rise in contemporary work environments due to swift technological advancements and intricate decision-making processes in unstable and delicate systems. The research examines the repercussions of dissonance on organizational decision-making processes as well, as innovation and overall welfare. This study looks at the BANI framework to pinpoint factors that worsen conflict and suggests ways to deal with it like building resilience and mindfulness techniques as well, as adaptive management strategies in order to lower stress levels and improve adaptability within organizations facing uncertainty, in the business environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Dulgeridis, Marcel & Schattenberg, Lisa & Schattenberg, Christian, 2024. "Kognitive Dissonanz in der BANI-Wirtschaft: Strategien zur Bewältigung von Spannungen in der aktuellen Arbeitswelt," IU Discussion Papers - Human Resources 2 (November 2024), IU International University of Applied Sciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iubhhr:306367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/306367/1/190873356X.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qing Tian & Jennifer L. Robertson, 2019. "How and When Does Perceived CSR Affect Employees’ Engagement in Voluntary Pro-environmental Behavior?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 399-412, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francisco Dias & Alexandra Meira Lavaredas & Patrícia Esteves, 2024. "What Is the Value of an Environmental Certification Label in Tourism Industry? Is It Worth the Effort?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Mario Morales-Parragué & Luis Araya-Castillo & Fidel Molina-Luque & Hugo Moraga-Flores, 2022. "Scientometric Analysis of Research on Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Hyewon Youn & Jong-Hyeong Kim, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Hotel Employees’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Roles of Organizational Pride and Meaningfulness of Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Nematollah Shiri & Vahid Jafari‐Sadeghi, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and green behaviour: Towards sustainable food‐business development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 605-620, March.
    5. Wang Hongxin & Mohammed Arshad Khan & Jian Zhenqiang & Laura-Mariana Cismaș & Mohammad Athar Ali & Usama Saleem & Lucia Negruț, 2022. "Unleashing the Role of CSR and Employees’ Pro-Environmental Behavior for Organizational Success: The Role of Connectedness to Nature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Saskia Crucke & Marie Servaes & Tom Kluijtmans & Shana Mertens & Eveline Schollaert, 2022. "Linking environmentally‐specific transformational leadership and employees' green advocacy: The influence of leadership integrity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 406-420, March.
    7. Shilong Wei & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Ubaldo Comite & Phung Anh Thu & Daniel Badulescu & József Popp, 2021. "An Examination to Explain the Mechanism of Employees’ Environment-Specific Behavior through CSR and Work Engagement from the Perspective of Stewardship Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Irmela Fritzi Koch-Bayram & Torsten Biemann, 2024. "How Corporate Social (Ir)Responsibility Influences Employees’ Private Prosocial Behavior: An Experimental Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 194(1), pages 103-118, September.
    9. Changqin Yin & Jie Tan & Yi Deng, 2025. "Corporate Social Responsibility Motive Attributions and Green Behaviors: Moderating Effect of Green Intrinsic Motivation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-26, February.
    10. Edina Molnár & Asif Mahmood & Naveed Ahmad & Amir Ikram & Shah Ali Murtaza, 2021. "The Interplay between Corporate Social Responsibility at Employee Level, Ethical Leadership, Quality of Work Life and Employee Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Case of Healthcare Organizations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Qiansong Zhang & Taiwen Feng & Long Cheng & Qingsong He, 2022. "Institutional force and firm performance: Do employee green involvement and flexibility‐oriented culture matter?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 950-964, July.
    12. Shanshan Li & Feiyu Chen & Xiao Gu, 2022. "Effects of Group Emotion and Moral Belief on Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Mediating Role of Psychological Clustering," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-16, September.
    13. Basheer M. Al-Ghazali & M. Sadiq Sohail & Ibrahim Ali M. Jumaan, 2021. "CSR Perceptions and Career Satisfaction: The Role of Psychological Capital and Moral Identity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    14. Danny Miller & Zhenyang Tang & Xiaowei Xu & Isabelle Breton-Miller, 2022. "Are Socially Responsible Firms Associated with Socially Responsible Citizens? A Study of Social Distancing During the Covid-19 Pandemic," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 387-410, August.
    15. Sadia Cheema & Bilal Afsar & Basheer M. Al‐Ghazali & Ahsen Maqsoom, 2020. "Retracted: How employee's perceived corporate social responsibility affects employee's pro‐environmental behaviour? The influence of organizational identification, corporate entrepreneurship, and envi," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 616-629, March.
    16. Michael Asiedu Gyensare & Samuel Adomako & Joseph Amankwah‐Amoah, 2024. "Green HRM practices, employee well‐being, and sustainable work behavior: Examining the moderating role of resource commitment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3129-3141, May.
    17. Shah Ali Murtaza & Asif Mahmood & Saima Saleem & Naveed Ahmad & Muhammad Suhail Sharif & Edina Molnár, 2021. "Proposing Stewardship Theory as an Alternate to Explain the Relationship between CSR and Employees’ Pro-Environmental Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    18. Siva K. Balasubramanian & Yiwei Fang & Zihao Yang, 2021. "Twitter Presence and Experience Improve Corporate Social Responsibility Outcomes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(4), pages 737-757, November.
    19. Hua Yu & Muhammad Salman Shabbir & Naveed Ahmad & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Heesup Han & Miklas Scholz & Muhammad Safdar Sial, 2021. "A Contemporary Issue of Micro-Foundation of CSR, Employee Pro-Environmental Behavior, and Environmental Performance toward Energy Saving, Carbon Emission Reduction, and Recycling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-15, May.
    20. Sajjad A. Afridi & Bilal Afsar & Asad Shahjehan & Zia U. Rehman & Maqsood Haider & Mehboob Ullah, 2020. "Retracted: Perceived corporate social responsibility and innovative work behavior: The role of employee volunteerism and authenticity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1865-1877, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iubhhr:306367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.iu.de/forschung/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.