IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifwkbw/10.html

Klinikentgelte in den Bundesländern: Kostengerecht oder wettbewerbsverzerrend?

Author

Listed:
  • Benček, David
  • Klodt, Henning

Abstract

Dieser Beitrag geht der Frage nach, ob die unterschiedlich hohen Landesbasisfallwerte für Kliniken in Deutschland durch systematische Kostenunterschiede zwischen den Bundesländern zu erklären sind. Die statistische Analyse kommt zu dem Ergebnis, dass einzig krankenhausspezifische und strukturelle Merkmale der Regionen und nicht die gegenwärtige Kostenstruktur der Kliniken ansatzweise die Varianz in den Landesbasisfallwerten erklären können. Mehr als drei Viertel der Unterschiede gehen auf nicht gemessene Faktoren zurück oder sind gar willkürlicher Natur. Nach der ökonomischen Theorie anreizeffizienter Regulierung erscheint eine Fortsetzung des Konvergenzprozesses der Basisfallwerte hin zu einer bundeseinheitlichen Pauschale sinnvoll.

Suggested Citation

  • Benček, David & Klodt, Henning, 2017. "Klinikentgelte in den Bundesländern: Kostengerecht oder wettbewerbsverzerrend?," Kieler Beiträge zur Wirtschaftspolitik 10, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkbw:10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/157939/1/886422515.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wickham, Hadley, 2011. "The Split-Apply-Combine Strategy for Data Analysis," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 40(i01).
    2. Armstrong, Mark & Sappington, David E.M., 2007. "Recent Developments in the Theory of Regulation," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: Mark Armstrong & Robert Porter (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 27, pages 1557-1700, Elsevier.
    3. Jean-Jacques Laffont & Jean Tirole, 1993. "A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262121743, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dennis L. Weisman, 2019. "The power of regulatory regimes reexamined," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 125-148, December.
    2. Dementiev, Andrei & Han, Hyen Jin, 2020. "A theory of deregulation in public transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Stronzik, Marcus, 2013. "Investitions- und Innovationsanreize: Ein Vergleich zwischen Revenue Cap und Yardstick Competition," WIK Discussion Papers 379, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH.
    4. David Martimort & Jerome Pouyet & Francesco Ricci, 2018. "Contracts for the Management of a Non-Renewable Resource under Asymmetric Information and Structural Price Breaks," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 132, pages 81-103.
    5. Kurdin, Alexander (Курдин, Александр), 2017. "Regulation of Enterprise Prices: Application Areas, Mechanisms and Methods of Regulation, Impact on Competition (Case Study of Gas Industry) [Регулирование Цен Предприятий: Области Применения, Механизмы И Методы Регулирования, Последствия Для Конк," Working Papers 031703, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    6. Worch, Hagen & Truffer, Bernhard & Kabinga, Mundia & Eberhard, Anton & Markard, Jochen, 2013. "A capability perspective on performance deficiencies in utility firms," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 1-9.
    7. Giacomo Calzolari & Carlo Scarpa, 2009. "Footloose Monopolies: Regulating a “National Champion”," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 1179-1214, December.
    8. Dan Wang & Peng Hao & Jiancheng Wang, 2023. "Quantities vs. prices: monopoly regulation without transfer under asymmetric demand information," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 177-205, June.
    9. Raffaele Fiocco & Roland Strausz, 2015. "Consumer Standards as a Strategic Device to Mitigate Ratchet Effects in Dynamic Regulation," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 550-569, September.
    10. Di Corato, Luca & Moretto, Michele, 2026. "Dynamic Adverse Selection with Flow Limited Liability: A Closed-Form Approach to Price Regulation," FEEM Working Papers 396239, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    11. Martin Besfamille & Nicolás Figueroa & León Guzmán, 2022. "Fare Evasion and Monopoly Regulation," CESifo Working Paper Series 9592, CESifo.
    12. Daiya ISOGAWA & Hiroshi OHASHI, 2025. "Dynamic Bargaining under Ratchet Effects: Evidence from cardiac pacemakers," Discussion papers 25118, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    13. Alessio D’Amato & Laurent Franckx, 2010. "Nonpoint pollution regulation targeted on emission proxies: the role of yardstick schemes," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 12(4), pages 201-218, December.
    14. M. Besfamille & N. Figueroa & L. Guzmán‐Lizardo, 2025. "Ramsey Pricing Revisited: Natural Monopoly Regulation With Evaders," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(4), pages 569-588, December.
    15. Fiocco, Raffaele & Scarpa, Carlo, 2011. "The regulation of interdependent markets," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2011-046, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    16. Major, Iván & Kiss, Károly M., 2011. "Regulation of network industries in the European Union and in Central and Eastern Europe," 22nd European Regional ITS Conference, Budapest 2011: Innovative ICT Applications - Emerging Regulatory, Economic and Policy Issues 52194, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    17. Stern, Jon, 2014. "The British utility regulation model: Its recent history and future prospects," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 162-172.
    18. Giovanni Immordino & Michele Polo, 2014. "Public Policies in Investment-Intensive Industries," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Martin Peitz & Yossi Spiegel (ed.), THE ANALYSIS OF COMPETITION POLICY AND SECTORAL REGULATION, chapter 13, pages 365-388, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    19. Endre Bjoerndal & Mette Bjoerndal & Astrid Cullmann & Maria Nieswand, 2016. "Finding the Right Yardstick: Regulation under Heterogeneous Environments," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1555, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    20. Tangerås, Thomas P., 2012. "Optimal transmission regulation of an integrated energy market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1644-1655.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkbw:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.