Risk-reward trade-offs: Modes of innovation and economic performance of young firms

The literature has established that young firms engaged in R&D exhibit a pronounced asymmetry in their economic performance, with high premia at the upper end of the conditional growth distribution. We argue that this binary view - i.e., R&D-oriented firms versus all others - is somewhat limited. In particular, non-R&D innovation activity should be treated as an important category in its own right, and that its sui generis mode of learning is reflected in a distinct growth pattern. We examine data from the German IAB/ZEW Start-up Panel. Our evidence suggests that young non-R&D innovators also exhibit asymmetric and improved economic performance relative to non-innovators, although less so than R&D firms. Our results also suggest that firms engaged in non-R&D innovation grow in a less risky and costly way than R&D innovators, and that a young firm's decision whether to engage in R&D for the purpose of innovation and growth can therefore usefully be understood as being driven by a specific risk-return trade-off.