IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/i4rdps/225.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Origins of Reporting Bias: Selective but Unbiased Reporting by Early-Career Researchers?

Author

Listed:
  • Asanov, Anastasiya-Mariya
  • Asanov, Igor
  • Buenstorf, Guido
  • Kadriu, Valon
  • Schoch, Pia

Abstract

Doctoral dissertations provide evidence about research practices in early career-stage research. We examine reporting bias by manually collecting over 94,000 test statistics from a random sample of German dissertations and their follow-up papers worldwide. We observe selective reporting, as only a fraction of the tests in the dissertations is reported in follow-up papers. Unexpectedly, we find no increase in reporting bias in follow-up papers compared to dissertations nor, generally, reporting bias in dissertations or papers. Self-selection into higher-impact journals based on statistical significance may reconcile our finding of selective yet "unbiased" reporting with prior evidence suggesting pervasive reporting bias.

Suggested Citation

  • Asanov, Anastasiya-Mariya & Asanov, Igor & Buenstorf, Guido & Kadriu, Valon & Schoch, Pia, 2025. "The Origins of Reporting Bias: Selective but Unbiased Reporting by Early-Career Researchers?," I4R Discussion Paper Series 225, The Institute for Replication (I4R).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:i4rdps:225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/316397/1/I4R-DP225.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    research transparency; reporting bias; higher education; young researchers;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A14 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Sociology of Economics
    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate
    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:i4rdps:225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.i4replication.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.