Using selected diagnoses to improve the Chilean capitation formula
Objectives: To contribute to the policy discussion of equity and health financing in Chile by evaluating the improvement in the capitation formula for paying PHC providers by using selected diagnoses. The socio-economic status of the municipalities and the urban/rural location of providers are used to adjust current capitation payments to providers. Issues have been raised about the ability of the formula to predict the utilization of PHC. In this study we test if adding individual information, such as age, gender and selected diagnoses improves the formula's explanatory power. Age, gender and diagnosis are important variables because of their strong relationship to increased morbidity risk and to needs for preventive and reproductive health care respectively. Methods: A sample of 10,000 individuals was drawn and two years utilization-of- services data was collected from a region in Chile. Information on age, gender, socio-economic status and urban/rural residence, the number of preventive or curative visits and the presence of seven key diagnoses was collected. Regression analysis and two tests to identify the best model were performed: i) R-square, which measures the proportion of the variance in individual expenditures and ii) predictive-ratio which measures the accuracy of prediction at the group level (where 1.0 indicates perfect prediction). Conclusions: We recommend to add age, gender and two diagnoses; hypertension and diabetes to the current capitation formula. The explanatory power of this model at the individual level was 28.5% and at health centre level the predictive ratio was close to 1.0.
|Date of creation:||2002|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Friedrich-Loeffler-Str. 70 - 17489 Greifswald|
Phone: (03834) - 86-2452
Fax: (03834) 86-2451
Web page: http://www.rsf.uni-greifswald.de/meta/english.html
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Brian Hutchison & Jeremiah Hurley & Stephen Birch & Jonathan Lomas & Stephen Walter & John Eyles & Fawne Stratford-Devai, 2000.
"Needs-based primary medical care capitation: Development and evaluation of alternative approaches,"
Health Care Management Science,
Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 89-99, February.
- B Hutchison & J Hurley & S Birch & J Lomas & S Walter & J Eyles & F Stratford-Devai, 1997. "Needs-based Primary Medical Care Capitation: Development and Evaluation of Alternative Approaches," Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series 1997-10, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
- Van de ven, Wynand P.M.M. & Ellis, Randall P., 2000. "Risk adjustment in competitive health plan markets," Handbook of Health Economics, in: A. J. Culyer & J. P. Newhouse (ed.), Handbook of Health Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 14, pages 755-845 Elsevier.
- Arlene Ash & Randall P. Ellis & Gregory Pope & John Ayanian & David Bates & Helen Burstin & Lisa Iezzoni & Elizabeth McKay & Wei Yu, 2000. "Using Diagnoses to Describe Populations and Predict Costs," Papers 0099, Boston University - Industry Studies Programme.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:grewdp:062002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.