IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/esprep/341060.html

CBDC vs Cryptocurrency in Pakistan: A Comparative Review

Author

Listed:
  • Raza, Hassan
  • Siddiqui, Danish Ahmed

Abstract

While the growing, informal adoption of cryptocurrencies exacerbated by Pakistan's inconsistent regulatory stance regarding cryptocurrency adoption and regulation, presents a speculative and volatile threat to the nation's financial stability, a well-designed Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) offers a controlled, secure, and regulated path toward financial inclusion, economic formalization, and enhanced monetary policy control. The objective of this analytical review to search the grey literature and Scientific writings to analyze the mix approach of Pakistan toward Digital Finance especially Cryptocurrency and CBDC. This review article examines this ideological struggle, tracing the history of the State Bank of Pakistan's (SBP) and Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan's (SECP) cautionary stance on decentralized cryptocurrencies, driven by concerns over financial integrity, money laundering, and consumer protection. It then contrasts this with the government's recent pivot toward a pro-innovation approach, spearheaded by the establishment of the Pakistan Crypto Council (PCC) and the appointment of key advisors. This pivot is a direct response to a burgeoning, informal digital asset market, with millions of Pakistanis already actively using virtual currencies to hedge against inflation and overcome financial access barriers. The article analyzes two parallel policy pathways emerging from this tension: the development of a state-controlled Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) and the formalization of the decentralized virtual assets market through the new Virtual Assets Act (VAA) 2025. The research offers a comprehensive understanding of the strategic trade-offs a developing country faces when navigating the complex relationship between financial stability, technological innovation, and economic inclusion, providing a crucial case study for international policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Raza, Hassan & Siddiqui, Danish Ahmed, 2026. "CBDC vs Cryptocurrency in Pakistan: A Comparative Review," EconStor Preprints 341060, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:341060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/341060/1/CBDC-Cryptocurrency.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:341060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.