IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/esprep/341052.html

How Adoption of Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms (STARA) influences Job Stress, Turnover intentions, and work affective well-being: The mediating role of cynicism, depression, Complimented by Psychological Resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Alyan
  • Siddiqui, Danish Ahmed

Abstract

Job responsibilities, organizational structures, and employee experiences are changing as a result of the quick adoption of Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms (STARA) in the modern workplace. Although these developments promise increased creativity and efficiency, they also present significant emotional and psychological challenges for workers. With an emphasis on the mediating functions of cynicism, depression, and job stress, this study examines the relationship between STARA and employees' intentions to leave as well as their work-related emotional well-being. The study, which is based on the Conservation of Resources theory, suggests that negative emotional reactions such as Cynicism and Depression are influenced by the perceived danger of technology displacement, greater performance monitoring, and loss of human autonomy. These reactions lead to Job Stress, which will ultimately affect employees' turnover and work affective well-being. This study also presents psychological resilience as a moderating factor, based on the hypothesis that people with higher resilience levels are better able to handle STARA-induced difficulties, which mitigates the negative impacts on well-being and lowers turnover intentions. Cynicism is a reflection of disillusionment with organizational change, depression is a symptom of deeper emotional weariness, and job stress is the immediate strain of adjusting to changing work conditions. Using data from 527 respondents, analyzed with SmartPLS 4.0 and various models, STARA positively impacts, and the study finds that STARA affects all cynicism, depression, job stress, and turnover, or well-being outcomes are all included in the study. The results lend credence to the notion that, despite its technological potential, STARA psychologically destabilizes employees, especially when it isn't paired with clear communication, emotional support, or upskilling strategies. Additionally, the moderating effect of psychological resilience suggests a potential area for management intervention. Resilience alone cannot eliminate stress, but it can keep it from growing worse, particularly when technology is unreliable. The study suggests further exploration of choices and strategies to engage STARA influence in the organization, with the security of employees and their benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Alyan & Siddiqui, Danish Ahmed, 2026. "How Adoption of Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms (STARA) influences Job Stress, Turnover intentions, and work affective well-being: The mediating role of cynicism, depression, Complimented by Psychological Resilienc," EconStor Preprints 341052, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:341052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/341052/1/Corrected-Alyan.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brougham, David & Haar, Jarrod, 2018. "Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms (STARA): Employees’ perceptions of our future workplace," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 239-257, March.
    2. David H. Autor, 2015. "Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(3), pages 3-30, Summer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Molla, M. M., 2024. "Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Fear of Job Displacement in Banks in Bangladesh," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 42(1), pages 1-18.
    2. Santana, Monica & Cobo, Manuel J., 2020. "What is the future of work? A science mapping analysis," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 846-862.
    3. Brougham, David & Haar, Jarrod, 2020. "Technological disruption and employment: The influence on job insecurity and turnover intentions: A multi-country study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Lingmont, Derek N.J. & Alexiou, Andreas, 2020. "The contingent effect of job automating technology awareness on perceived job insecurity: Exploring the moderating role of organizational culture," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    5. Rongyun Zhou & Qian Zhang, 2024. "The Impact of Industrial Robots on the Sustainable Development of Zombie Firms in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Yoon, Sojin & Lee, Na Yeon & Lim, Yerim & Hong, Sehee, 2026. "The relationship between worry about technological progress and job engagement - Differences by type of job characteristics," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    7. Thomas Bolli & Filippo Pusterla, 2022. "Decomposing the effects of digitalization on workers’ job satisfaction," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 69(2), pages 263-300, June.
    8. Antonio A. Casilli & Paola Tubaro, 2026. "What is AI Doing to Job Quality? Platformization, Fissured Workplaces and Dispersion," Post-Print hal-05562501, HAL.
    9. Ashraf Elsafty & Ahmed Elzeftawy, 2023. "Towards Effective Mitigation of the Digital Transformation and COVID-19 Risk on Unemployment in Mobile Operators in Egypt," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(2), pages 123-123, February.
    10. Cette, Gilbert & Devillard, Aurélien & Spiezia, Vincenzo, 2021. "The contribution of robots to productivity growth in 30 OECD countries over 1975–2019," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    11. Tao Chen & Shuwen Pi & Qing Sophie Wang, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence and Corporate Investment Efficiency: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Working Papers in Economics 25/05, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    12. Ayhan, Fatih & Elal, Onuray, 2023. "The IMPACTS of technological change on employment: Evidence from OECD countries with panel data analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    13. Shigeru Fujita & Madison Perry, 2024. "Nonworking Parents or Hungry Children," Economic Insights, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, vol. 9(4), pages 2-9, December.
    14. Ville-Veikko Pulkka, 2017. "A free lunch with robots – can a basic income stabilise the digital economy?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 23(3), pages 295-311, August.
    15. Adrian Otoiu & Ramona Bere & Catalin Silvestru, 2017. "An Assessment of the First Round Impact of Innovation Industries on Europe’s Regional Economies," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(44), pages 289-289, February.
    16. Qihang Li & Yituan Liu & Wenjie Li & Linman Zheng, 2025. "Will Industrial Robots Terminate Enterprise Innovation?—An Empirical Evidence from China’s Enterprise Robot Penetration," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 10074-10103, June.
    17. Lütkenhorst, Wilfried, 2018. "Creating wealth without labour? Emerging contours of a new techno-economic landscape," IDOS Discussion Papers 11/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    18. Gao, Jie & Li, Zhizhuo & Nguyen, Thithuha & Zhang, Wentao, 2025. "Digital transformation and enterprise employment," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    19. Fenglin Zhang, 2026. "The labor theory of value in the era of artificial intelligence and digital platforms: challenges, innovations, and new mechanisms," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Eeman Almokdad & Chung Hun Lee, 2024. "Service Robots in the Workplace: Fostering Sustainable Collaboration by Alleviating Perceived Burdensomeness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-17, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:341052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.