IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/esprep/341052.html

How Adoption of Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms (STARA) influences Job Stress, Turnover intentions, and work affective well-being: The mediating role of cynicism, depression, Complimented by Psychological Resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Alyan
  • Siddiqui, Danish Ahmed

Abstract

Job responsibilities, organizational structures, and employee experiences are changing as a result of the quick adoption of Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms (STARA) in the modern workplace. Although these developments promise increased creativity and efficiency, they also present significant emotional and psychological challenges for workers. With an emphasis on the mediating functions of cynicism, depression, and job stress, this study examines the relationship between STARA and employees' intentions to leave as well as their work-related emotional well-being. The study, which is based on the Conservation of Resources theory, suggests that negative emotional reactions such as Cynicism and Depression are influenced by the perceived danger of technology displacement, greater performance monitoring, and loss of human autonomy. These reactions lead to Job Stress, which will ultimately affect employees' turnover and work affective well-being. This study also presents psychological resilience as a moderating factor, based on the hypothesis that people with higher resilience levels are better able to handle STARA-induced difficulties, which mitigates the negative impacts on well-being and lowers turnover intentions. Cynicism is a reflection of disillusionment with organizational change, depression is a symptom of deeper emotional weariness, and job stress is the immediate strain of adjusting to changing work conditions. Using data from 527 respondents, analyzed with SmartPLS 4.0 and various models, STARA positively impacts, and the study finds that STARA affects all cynicism, depression, job stress, and turnover, or well-being outcomes are all included in the study. The results lend credence to the notion that, despite its technological potential, STARA psychologically destabilizes employees, especially when it isn't paired with clear communication, emotional support, or upskilling strategies. Additionally, the moderating effect of psychological resilience suggests a potential area for management intervention. Resilience alone cannot eliminate stress, but it can keep it from growing worse, particularly when technology is unreliable. The study suggests further exploration of choices and strategies to engage STARA influence in the organization, with the security of employees and their benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Alyan & Siddiqui, Danish Ahmed, 2026. "How Adoption of Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms (STARA) influences Job Stress, Turnover intentions, and work affective well-being: The mediating role of cynicism, depression, Complimented by Psychological Resilienc," EconStor Preprints 341052, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:341052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/341052/1/Corrected-Alyan.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brougham, David & Haar, Jarrod, 2018. "Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms (STARA): Employees’ perceptions of our future workplace," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 239-257, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eeman Almokdad & Chung Hun Lee, 2024. "Service Robots in the Workplace: Fostering Sustainable Collaboration by Alleviating Perceived Burdensomeness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Peter Mantello & Manh-Tung Ho & Minh-Hoang Nguyen & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2023. "Machines that feel: behavioral determinants of attitude towards affect recognition technology—upgrading technology acceptance theory with the mindsponge model," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Molla, M. M., 2024. "Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Fear of Job Displacement in Banks in Bangladesh," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 42(1), pages 1-18.
    4. Mohamed Mousa & Doaa Althalathini & Vesa Puhakka, 2025. "Public Value Creation Amid Geopolitical Challenges: the Necessity of Robotizing Nurses’ Administrative Tasks in the Public Healthcare Context," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1423-1440, September.
    5. Santana, Monica & Cobo, Manuel J., 2020. "What is the future of work? A science mapping analysis," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 846-862.
    6. Olimpia Ban & Irina Maiorescu & Mihaela Bucur & Gabriel Cristian Sabou & Betty Cohen Tzedec, 2024. "AI between Threat and Benefactor for the Competences of the Human Working Force," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(67), pages 762-762, August.
    7. Guanglu Xu & Ming Xue & Jidi Zhao, 2023. "The Association between Artificial Intelligence Awareness and Employee Depression: The Mediating Role of Emotional Exhaustion and the Moderating Role of Perceived Organizational Support," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Anya Johnson & Shanta Dey & Helena Nguyen & Markus Groth & Sadhbh Joyce & Leona Tan & Nicholas Glozier & Samuel B Harvey, 2020. "A review and agenda for examining how technology-driven changes at work will impact workplace mental health and employee well-being," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(3), pages 402-424, August.
    9. Byung-Jik Kim & Julak Lee, 2024. "The mental health implications of artificial intelligence adoption: the crucial role of self-efficacy," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Muhammad Farrukh Moin & Abhishek Behl & Justin Zuopeng Zhang & Amit Shankar, 2025. "AI in the Organizational Nexus: Building Trust, Cementing Commitment, and Evolving Psychological Contracts," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 1413-1424, August.
    11. Nadeem, Kashif & Wong, Sut I. & Za, Stefano & Venditti, Michelina, 2024. "Digital transformation and industry 4.0 employees: Empirical evidence from top digital nations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    12. Wioleta Kucharska, 2020. "The Power Of Mistakes: Constant Learning Culture And Technology," GUT FME Working Paper Series A 61, Faculty of Management and Economics, Gdansk University of Technology.
    13. Livio Cricelli & Serena Strazzullo, 2021. "The Economic Aspect of Digital Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Brougham, David & Haar, Jarrod, 2020. "Technological disruption and employment: The influence on job insecurity and turnover intentions: A multi-country study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    15. Zhong, Lina & Verma, Rohit & Wei, Wenqi & Morrsion, Alastair M. & Yang, Liyu, 2022. "Multi-stakeholder perspectives on the impacts of service robots in urban hotel rooms," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    16. Horacio Molina-Sánchez & Gabriele Giorgi & Dante Castillo Guajardo & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2022. "Special Issue “Rethinking the Subjective Wellbeing for a New Workplace Scenario”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-6, April.
    17. Lingmont, Derek N.J. & Alexiou, Andreas, 2020. "The contingent effect of job automating technology awareness on perceived job insecurity: Exploring the moderating role of organizational culture," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    18. Yuhong Du & Hazrul Shahiri & Xiahai Wei, 2025. "The penetration of robotic technology, task content routinisation and job satisfaction: Evidence from China," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 50(3), pages 876-894, August.
    19. Serena Strazzullo & Sérgio Moro & Livio Cricelli, 2023. "Unveiling the relationship between sustainable development and Industry 4.0: A text mining literature analysis," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 2851-2862, August.
    20. Rongyun Zhou & Qian Zhang, 2024. "The Impact of Industrial Robots on the Sustainable Development of Zombie Firms in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:341052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.