IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v85y2026ics0160791x25003537.html

The relationship between worry about technological progress and job engagement - Differences by type of job characteristics

Author

Listed:
  • Yoon, Sojin
  • Lee, Na Yeon
  • Lim, Yerim
  • Hong, Sehee

Abstract

Unlike earlier waves of technological development, Industry 4.0 technologies now challenge the assumption that complex and analytical roles are less susceptible to automation. This study examines the relationship of concerns about technological progress with workers' job engagement, particularly how these vary across different job characteristics. Using data from 17,087 Korean employees, we categorized job characteristics into four types: High Autonomy-Simple (23.4 %), Low Autonomy-Simple (33.8 %), High Autonomy-Complex (28.8 %), and Low Autonomy-Complex (14.0 %). The results indicate that worry about technological progress and automation negatively relates to job engagement, with the extent of these results differing across job characteristic groups. These findings highlight the need to consider job characteristics when assessing the relationship between technological concerns and workers' job engagement. Additionally, the importance of enhancing employees' perceived usefulness and ease of use of emerging technologies to foster resilience in an evolving labor market was emphasized.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoon, Sojin & Lee, Na Yeon & Lim, Yerim & Hong, Sehee, 2026. "The relationship between worry about technological progress and job engagement - Differences by type of job characteristics," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:85:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x25003537
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25003537
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:85:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x25003537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.