IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/eibwps/319607.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How does digitalisation support firms' strategies for climate change mitigation and adaptation

Author

Listed:
  • Kalantzis, Fotios
  • Kesidou, Effie
  • Ri, Anastasia
  • Roper, Stephen

Abstract

This paper investigates how firms navigate the dual challenges of digitalisation and climate change. Our comprehensive approach considers climate change strategies, distinguishing adaptation-only, mitigation-only and 'dual' adaptation and mitigation strategies. Drawing on theoretical insights from the literature on digital affordances, we argue that digitalisation enables firms to recognise better the opportunities and risks associated with climate change. These affordances significantly influence strategic decisions regarding adaptation, mitigation, or a combination of both, ultimately impacting the intensity of their implementation efforts. To empirically examine these dynamics, we analyse data from the 2022 and 2023 European Investment Bank Investment Survey waves. Our sample includes over 24,000 firms, spanning small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and large businesses across 27 EU Member States and the USA. Our results reveal that firms with higher digitalisation are more likely to adopt a 'dual' strategy that combines mitigation and adaptation efforts rather than pursuing a single climate strategy or no climate response. Furthermore, we find a positive relationship between digitalisation and climate action intensity across mitigation and adaptation measures. Importantly, these patterns hold consistently across different sectors and firm sizes. Overall, our study sheds light on the critical role of digital technologies in shaping firms' climate responses, emphasising the need for organisations to leverage their technological strengths to address environmental challenges effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Kalantzis, Fotios & Kesidou, Effie & Ri, Anastasia & Roper, Stephen, 2025. "How does digitalisation support firms' strategies for climate change mitigation and adaptation," EIB Working Papers 2025/04, European Investment Bank (EIB).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:eibwps:319607
    DOI: 10.2867/1306278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/319607/1/1927845521.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2867/1306278?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brutscher, Philipp-Bastian & Coali, Andrea & Delanote, Julie & Harasztosi, Peter, 2020. "EIB Group Survey on Investment and Investment Finance: A technical note on data quality," EIB Working Papers 2020/08, European Investment Bank (EIB).
    2. Jonatan Pinkse & Pelin Demirel & Alba Marino, 2024. "Unlocking innovation for net zero: constraints, enablers, and firm-level transition strategies," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 16-41, January.
    3. Jung Eun Kang & D.K. Yoon & Jinyoung Rhee, 2017. "Factors contributing to business actions in response to climate change in Korea," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 385-403, March.
    4. Belinda Wade & Andrew Griffiths, 2022. "Exploring the Cognitive Foundations of Managerial (Climate) Change Decisions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 15-40, November.
    5. Kalantzis, Fotios & Dominguez, Sofia, 2022. "Are EU firms climate-ready? Micro evidence from EIBIS," EIB Working Papers 2022/08, European Investment Bank (EIB).
    6. Sandro Montresor & Antonio Vezzani, 2023. "Digital technologies and eco-innovation. Evidence of the twin transition from Italian firms," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(7), pages 766-800, August.
    7. Karl E. Weick & Kathleen M. Sutcliffe & David Obstfeld, 2005. "Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 409-421, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bruce Pinnington & Joanne Meehan, 2023. "Learning to see modern slavery in supply chains through paradoxical sensemaking," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 59(4), pages 22-41, October.
    2. Carlos Martin-Rios, 2016. "Innovative management control systems in knowledge work: a middle manager perspective," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 181-204, May.
    3. Verena Brinks, 2016. "Situated affect and collective meaning: A community perspective on processes of value creation and commercialization in enthusiast-driven fields," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(6), pages 1152-1169, June.
    4. Stefan Gröschl & Patricia Gabaldón & Tobias Hahn, 2019. "The Co-evolution of Leaders’ Cognitive Complexity and Corporate Sustainability: The Case of the CEO of Puma," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 741-762, March.
    5. Elena Antonacopoulou, 2018. "Energising critique in action and in learning: The GNOSIS 4R Framework," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 102-125, May.
    6. Guiette, Alain & Vandenbempt, Koen, 2017. "Change managerialism and micro-processes of sensemaking during change implementation," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 65-81.
    7. Martina Linnenluecke & Andrew Griffiths & Peter Mumby, 2015. "Executives’ engagement with climate science and perceived need for business adaptation to climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 321-333, July.
    8. Per Engelseth & Richard Glavee-Geo & Artur Janusz & Enoch Niboi, 2020. "The Emergent Nature of Networked Sustainable Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Femke Hilverda & Margôt Kuttschreuter, 2018. "Online Information Sharing About Risks: The Case of Organic Food," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(9), pages 1904-1920, September.
    10. Jeffery S. McMullen & Dimo Dimov, 2013. "Time and the Entrepreneurial Journey: The Problems and Promise of Studying Entrepreneurship as a Process," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(8), pages 1481-1512, December.
    11. Emil Evenhuis, 2017. "Institutional change in cities and regions: a path dependency approach," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 10(3), pages 509-526.
    12. Minkkinen, Matti, 2019. "The anatomy of plausible futures in policy processes: Comparing the cases of data protection and comprehensive security," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 172-180.
    13. Stea, Diego & Foss, Nicolai J. & Christensen, Peter Holdt, 2015. "Physical separation in the workplace: Separation cues, separation awareness, and employee motivation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 462-471.
    14. Heather Rosoff & Robert Siko & Richard John & William J. Burns, 2013. "Should I stay or should I go? An experimental study of health and economic government policies following a severe biological agent release," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 121-137, March.
    15. Tiina J. Peltola & Hanna Tiirinki, 2020. "More Than Numbers: Discourses of Health Care Quality in Finland," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    16. Benedetta Montanaro & Annalisa Croce & Elisa Ughetto, 2024. "Venture capital investments in artificial intelligence," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 1-28, January.
    17. Rydén, Pernille & Ringberg, Torsten & Wilke, Ricky, 2015. "How Managers' Shared Mental Models of Business–Customer Interactions Create Different Sensemaking of Social Media," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 1-16.
    18. Ian Yeoman, 2023. "Sensemaking," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 1-2, February.
    19. Amal Aouadi & Sylvain Marsat, 2018. "Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(4), pages 1027-1047, September.
    20. Suzana Matoh & Sally V. Russell & Katy Roelich & Sally Randles, 2024. "Circular business model innovation and cognitive framing: Addressing the “missing micro”," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8656-8667, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:eibwps:319607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ceeiblu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.