IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wrk/warwec/1607.html

Greenwashing or Pragmatism?

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Junxi

    (University of Warwick)

  • Pi, Shaoting

    (Iowa State University)

  • Wang, Ao

    (Universioty of Warwick)

Abstract

Shareholder support for environmental and social (ES) proposals increased by more than 50% between 2010 and 2020, yet the content of such proposals can vary substantially. We first document that there has been a large retreat in big-ask proposals (e.g., demanding operational changes for firms). The big-ask proposals fell from about 40% of ES ballots to roughly 5%, being replaced by small-ask proposals (e.g., requesting additional disclosure), and the increase in overall support rate is driven by favorable votes on small asks compared to big asks. However, we caution against interpreting these trends as greenwashing. Investigating both sides of shareholder democracy (proponents and voters), we develop and estimate a structural model in which ES proponents choose a portfolio of proposal types, anticipating vote outcomes. The model captures a feedback: changes in voting reshape the mix of sponsored proposals, and that mix, in turn, shapes observed support rates. Counterfactuals based on resubmission-style benchmarks suggest that the early part of the decade featured an oversupply of big-ask proposals and a moderate undersupply of small-ask proposals; the subsequent decline in big asks reflects an equilibrium correction toward small asks that are expected to receive meaningful support to generate incremental progress in ES. Therefore, the correction, along with growing voter support, suggests a shift towards a more pragmatic approach to ES issues rather than greenwashing.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Junxi & Pi, Shaoting & Wang, Ao, 2026. "Greenwashing or Pragmatism?," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1607, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:wrk:warwec:1607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/workingpapers/2026/twerp_1607-wang.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wrk:warwec:1607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Margaret Nash (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dewaruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.