IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Decoding the Effects of Trade Volume and Trade Policies on Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Investigation

Listed author(s):
  • Dardana Rruka

    (Chatham College)

Registered author(s):

    The study investigates the effects of trade volume and trade policies on economic growth. An extension of an earlier study, conducted by Halit Yanikkaya, the study investigates economic growth from cross-section data of 99 countries between 1998 and 2002. The study employs trade measure variables from the Economic Freedom Index, with data from 2000, published by the Fraser Institute as a part of the Economic Freedom of the World: 2002 Report. The study assesses the impact of trade openness, through utilization of the trade openness index, a category of the Economic Freedom Index, which consolidates measures of trade policy and trade volume along with other measures of trade. The study hypothesizes a positive relationship between trade openness and economic growth. Examination is also performed on the isolated effects of trade volume on economic growth, by using the trade sector size index, one component of the trade openness index, and effects of trade policy, by using the international trade taxation index, another component of the trade openness index. A positive relationship between trade openness and economic growth, as well as trade volume and economic growth is hypothesized, while a negative effect of more restrictive trade policies on economic growth is anticipated. Results are derived controlling for input factors relating to economic growth as well as institutional policies. The dependent variable, economic growth, is measured in two ways: (i) through GDP per capita growth rates of 2002; and (ii) the average annual GDP growth rates between 1998 and 2002. In the case of single year GDP per capita growth rates for 2002 the results of the trade variables, both aggregated and separate are found to be statistically insignificant. However, the dependent variable of GDP growth rates spanning over the period 1998- 2002 yields results consistent with those found by Yanikkaya: greater volumes of trade are positively associated with economic growth, but fewer trade restrictions measured as lower trade taxation rates are negatively associated with economic growth.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://econwpa.repec.org/eps/it/papers/0405/0405003.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by EconWPA in its series International Trade with number 0405003.

    as
    in new window

    Length: 85 pages
    Date of creation: 06 May 2004
    Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpit:0405003
    Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 85
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://econwpa.repec.org

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as
    in new window


    1. Edwards, Sebastian, 1993. "Openness, Trade Liberalization, and Growth in Developing Countries," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 31(3), pages 1358-1393, September.
    2. Dan Ben-David, 1993. "Equalizing Exchange: Trade Liberalization and Income Convergence," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 108(3), pages 653-679.
    3. Jagdish N. Bhagwati, 1978. "Anatomy and Consequences of Exchange Control Regimes," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number bhag78-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpit:0405003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.