IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpit/0212001.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Environmental Technology Transfer in a FDI Regime A Developing Country Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Author One

    (The University of the Great Ones)

  • Author Two

    (The University of Lesser Ones & Univ. of Truth or consequences)

  • U. Thirdone

    (The University of Mild Hysterics)

Abstract

The environmental impact of Foreign Direct Investment is still to be explored totally. It is often argued that investment may come to a region or country where environment protection norms are less strict. Investors may be induced to outsource their pollution-intensive production where the expected cost of pollution abatement is significantly less. This gave birth to the much debated idea of 'pollution havens', parallel to low-wage havens. Developing countries are more vulnerable to such cases since the environmental legislation and monitoring is not rigorous over there. Again, many have debated that such 'pollution havens' does not typically exist or at the best, transient in nature. Over the last decade, as a result of its policy towards opening up of the economy to the global markets, the extent of multinational activities and their share in trade and industrial production have risen steadily in India. Viewing this development, this paper primarily attempt to show the very existence of such a pollution haven in Indian scenario, analysing time series data for industrial production and international trade of identified pollution intensive industries in the country. Then it argues that, even if of transient nature, the phasing out of such a pollution haven regime is typically dependent upon the active institutional intervention. One important factor, this paper identifies, is of making of state-of-the-art knowledge base of impact analysis and alternative production possibilities that help design prudent environmental policy regime. Also it searches for the right kind of institutional interface at the international, national and industry level; and endeavours to find the implications thereof.

Suggested Citation

  • Author One & Author Two & U. Thirdone, 2002. "Environmental Technology Transfer in a FDI Regime A Developing Country Perspective," International Trade 0212001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpit:0212001
    Note: Type of Document - pdf; prepared on IBM PC; to print on HP;
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/it/papers/0212/0212001.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hettige, Hemamala & Huq, Mainul & Pargal, Sheoli & Wheeler, David, 1996. "Determinants of pollution abatement in developing countries: Evidence from South and Southeast Asia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(12), pages 1891-1904, December.
    2. Eskeland, Gunnar S. & Harrison, Ann E., 2003. "Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Susmita Dasgupta & Ashoka Mody & Subhendu Roy & David Wheeler, 2001. "Environmental Regulation and Development: A Cross-country Empirical Analysis," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 173-187.
    4. Blomstrom, Magnus & Kokko, Ari, 1997. "How foreign investment affects host countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1745, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angshuman Bhattacharya, 2002. "Environmental Technology Transfer in a FDI Regime: A Developing Country Perspective," International Trade 0212002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Dinda, Soumyananda, 2004. "Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 431-455, August.
    3. Nicole A. MATHYS & Jaime DE MELO, 2010. "Trade and Climate Change: The Challenges Ahead," Working Papers P14, FERDI.
    4. GUPTA Monika, 2019. "Decomposing The Role Of Different Factors In Co2 Emissions Increase In South Asia," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 14(1), pages 72-86, April.
    5. Hettige, Hemamala & Mani, Muthukumara & Wheeler, David, 2000. "Industrial pollution in economic development: the environmental Kuznets curve revisited," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 445-476, August.
    6. Kakali Mukhopadhyay & Debesh Chakraborty, 2005. "Is liberalization of trade good for the environment? Evidence from India," Asia-Pacific Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 12(1), pages 109-136, June.
    7. Weidong Sun & Zhigang Chen & Danyang Wang, 2019. "Can Land Marketization Help Reduce Industrial Pollution?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Arouri, Mohamed El Hedi & Caporale, Guglielmo Maria & Rault, Christophe & Sova, Robert & Sova, Anamaria, 2012. "Environmental Regulation and Competitiveness: Evidence from Romania," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 130-139.
    9. Ayse M. Erdogan, 2014. "Foreign Direct Investment And Environmental Regulations: A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 943-955, December.
    10. Natalia Zugravu-Soilita, 2017. "How does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Pollution? Toward a Better Understanding of the Direct and Conditional Effects," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 66(2), pages 293-338, February.
    11. Gopinath Pradhan & Kaustuva Barik, 1999. "Environment-Friendly Behaviour and Competitiveness: A Study of Pulp and Paper Industry in India," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 14(4), pages 481-501, December.
    12. Dasgupta, Susmita & Meisner, Craig & Wheeler, David & Jin, Yanhong, 2002. "Agricultural Trade, Development and Toxic Risk," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(8), pages 1401-1412, August.
    13. Dasgupta, Susmita & Lucas, Robert E. B. & Wheeler, David, 1998. "Small manufacturing plants, pollution, and poverty : new evidence from Brazil and Mexico," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2029, The World Bank.
    14. Ben Kheder, Sonia & Zugravu, Natalia, 2012. "Environmental regulation and French firms location abroad: An economic geography model in an international comparative study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 48-61.
    15. Bruvoll, Annegrete & Faehn, Taran, 2006. "Transboundary effects of environmental policy: Markets and emission leakages," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(4), pages 499-510, October.
    16. Natalia Zugravu-Soilita, 2018. "The impact of trade in environmental goods on pollution: what are we learning from the transition economies’ experience?," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 20(4), pages 785-827, October.
    17. Fabrice Darrigues & Jean-Marc Montaud, 2011. "Trade liberalization, environmental regulation and self-regulation of multinational firms," Working Papers hal-01880351, HAL.
    18. Astrid Fritz Carrapatoso, 2008. "Environmental aspects in free trade agreements in the Asia-Pacific region," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 229-243, June.
    19. Susmita Dasgupta & Benoit Laplante & Hua Wang & David Wheeler, 2002. "Confronting the Environmental Kuznets Curve," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 16(1), pages 147-168, Winter.
    20. Xingle Long & Yusen Luo & Huaping Sun & Gang Tian, 2018. "Fertilizer using intensity and environmental efficiency for China’s agriculture sector from 1997 to 2014," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(3), pages 1573-1591, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    FDI; Environment; Technology Transfer; Developing Country;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F21 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements
    • F23 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - Multinational Firms; International Business

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpit:0212001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: EconWPA (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.