IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwsre/sre-disc-2018_06.html

A critical realist knowledge production: Enhancing a Potential-oriented Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mikael Stigendal
  • Andreas Novy

Abstract

This article explores the implications of founding transdisciplinary collaborations of knowledge production in critical realism. We call such equal partnerships of researchers and practitioners knowledge alliances. Using the distinction between the referents that we refer to (what our research is about) and our references (our research about that), we show that practitioners can contribute to the process of knowledge production by providing access to referents and producing references but also by achieving relevance. Researchers and practitioners bring different types of knowledge. To become excellent, knowledge production should be organized in ways, which engage these different types in a constructive interplay. We call this approach potential-oriented, which we put in contrast to the empiricism of evidence-based research and policy-making. Our deliberate choice of the term potential-oriented reflects the shifts in philosophy suggested by critical realism, but also a sensitivity for how practitioners communicate and express themselves.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikael Stigendal & Andreas Novy, 2018. "A critical realist knowledge production: Enhancing a Potential-oriented Approach," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2018_06, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
  • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwsre:sre-disc-2018_06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/sre-disc/sre-disc-2018_06.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Konrad Miciukiewicz & Frank Moulaert & Andreas Novy & Sako Musterd & Jean Hillier, 2012. "Introduction: Problematising Urban Social Cohesion: A Transdisciplinary Endeavour," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(9), pages 1855-1872, July.
    2. Riccardo Crescenzi & Mara Giua, 2016. "The EU Cohesion Policy in context: Does a bottom-up approach work in all regions?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(11), pages 2340-2357, November.
    3. Frank Moulaert & Bob Jessop & Abid Mehmood, 2016. "Agency, structure, institutions, discourse (ASID) in urban and regional development," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 167-187, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stigendal, Mikael & Novy, Andreas, 2018. "A critical realist knowledge production: Enhancing a Potential-oriented Approach," SRE-Discussion Papers 2018/06, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    2. Riccardo Crescenzi & Mara Giua, 2018. "One or Many Cohesion Policies of the European Union? On the Diverging Impacts of Cohesion Policy across Member States," SERC Discussion Papers 0230, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    3. Paula Fernandez-Wulff, 2019. "Collective Agency in the Making: How Social Innovations in the Food System Practice Democracy beyond Consumption," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 81-93.
    4. Riccardo Crescenzi & Guido de Blasio & Mara Giua, 2020. "Cohesion Policy incentives for collaborative industrial research: evaluation of a Smart Specialisation forerunner programme," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(10), pages 1341-1353, October.
    5. Franziska Görmar, 2023. "Loss and change: Culture narratives in old industrial regions in East Germany," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(7), pages 1577-1595, September.
    6. Dicharry, Benoit & Nguyen-Van, Phu & Pham, Thi Kim Cuong, 2019. "“The winner takes it all” or a story of the optimal allocation of the European Cohesion Fund," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 385-399.
    7. Huanjia Ma & Raquel Ortega-Argiles & Matthew Lyons, 2024. "UK levelling up R&D mission effects: A multi-region input-output approach," MIOIR Working Paper Series 2024-03, The Manchester Institute of Innovation Research (MIoIR), The University of Manchester.
    8. Ganau, Roberto & Kilroy, Austin, 2023. "Detecting economic growth pathways in the EU’s lagging regions," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115162, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Bartalucci, Federico & Lozano-Gracia, Nancy & Dávalos, María, 2024. "Overcoming left-behindedness. Moving beyond the efficiency versus equity debate in territorial development," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 125629, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Mindaugas Butkus & Alma Maciulyte-Sniukiene & Kristina Matuzeviciute, 2020. "Heterogeneous growth outcomes of the EU’s regional financial support mediated by institutions with some empirical evidences at NUTS 3 level," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 40(1), pages 33-66, April.
    11. Marco Di Cataldo & Vassilis Monastiriotis, 2020. "Regional needs, regional targeting and regional growth: an assessment of EU Cohesion Policy in UK regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 35-47, January.
    12. Tomasz Grodzicki & Mateusz Jankiewicz, 2022. "The role of the common agricultural policy in contributing to jobs and growth in EU’s rural areas and the impact of employment on shaping rural development: Evidence from the Baltic States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-14, February.
    13. Benoit Dicharry & Nguyen-Van Phu & Thi Kim Cuong Pham, 2019. "La politique de cohésion de l’UE et la convergence économique," Bulletin de l'Observatoire des politiques économiques en Europe, Observatoire des Politiques Économiques en Europe (OPEE), vol. 41(1), pages 5-11, December.
    14. Ignatov Augustin, 2018. "Regional Development Discrepancies in the Eastern European Union Analysed through the Prism of Growth Determinants," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 18(4), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Bohn, Dorothee, 2025. "Pathway evolution of Arctic enclave resorts," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    16. Benoit Dicharry & Nguyen-Van Phu & Thi Kim Cuong Pham, 2019. "La politique de cohésion de l’UE et la convergence économique," Bulletin de l'Observatoire des politiques économiques en Europe, Observatoire des Politiques Économiques en Europe (OPEE), vol. 41(1), pages 5-11, November.
    17. Lionel Vedrine & Julie Le Gallo, 2021. "Does EU Cohesion Policy affect territorial inequalities and regional development?," Post-Print hal-03327693, HAL.
    18. Jason C. Mueller, 2019. "What can sociologists of globalization and development learn from Nicos Poulantzas?," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 19(4), pages 284-303, October.
    19. Maximilian Benner, 2021. "System-level agency and its many shades: How to shape the system for path development?," PEGIS geo-disc-2021_10, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    20. Adriana Z. F. C. Nishimura & Ana Moreira & Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira & Maria José Sousa, 2021. "Effectiveness of the Portugal 2020 Programme: A Study from the Citizens’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwsre:sre-disc-2018_06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.wu-wien.ac.at/mlgd/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.