IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa02p332.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measuring "small-world" connectivity in international trade: a shift-share and ANOVA approach

Author

Listed:
  • Schintler, Laurie

  • Kulkarni, Rajendra

  • Stough, Roger

Abstract

Improvements in telecommunications and transportation appear to be bringing the world closer making physical location less of a factor in determining interaction between nations. The formation of regional and global trading pacts and arrangements seem to be further contribution to this interaction. Some would argue that what is evolving, as a result of these developments, is a 'small world' network. This type of network has a high degree of cliquishness, or local connectivity, and a relatively short average minimum path, or strong overall network connectivity. 'Small-world networks' is a new concept that is receiving a lot of attention. Introduced by Watts and Strogatz (1998), a 'small-world network' is based on 'six degrees of separation' or the notion that everyone in the world is related to everyone else through at most six acquaintances. 'Six degrees of separation' arises from the existence of cliques and a few popular individuals who provide connections between these cliques. The huge appeal of 'small-world networks' lies in the impact they are said to have on dynamical systems. According to Watts and Strogatz(1998), for example, models of dynamical systems with small-world coupling display enhanced signal propagation speed, computational power, and synchronizability. Furthermore, contagious diseases tend to spread more freely in 'small-world networks'. These findings have profound implications for many manmade and natural systems. In a trading network, 'small-world' topology might contribute to the regional and global economic spillover effects. This paper introduces a method, based on shift-share analysis and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), which can be used to measure the extent of 'small-world' connectivity is evolving in a network. The shift-share model is basically a rule of thumb/empirical method and is used in identifying the "small world" activity. ANOVA is used as a theoretical explanation of the shift-share results and an alternate way to measure "small world". The model is applied to two distinct time periods, the first from 1996 to 1998 and the second from 1989 to 1992. The first time period is representative of the trading network topology that was present in the 1980's, in particular a lot of local trading arrangements (cliques) and very few multilateral alliances and agreements between nations of different cliques, while the latter time period reflects stronger local trading arrangements (cliques) and the introduction of multilateral and bilateral agreements between nations of different cliques. Results are summarized using a geographic information system.

Suggested Citation

  • Schintler, Laurie & Kulkarni, Rajendra & Stough, Roger, 2002. "Measuring "small-world" connectivity in international trade: a shift-share and ANOVA approach," ERSA conference papers ersa02p332, European Regional Science Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa02p332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa02/cd-rom/papers/332.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wilfred J. Ethier, 1998. "Regionalism in a Multilateral World," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 106(6), pages 1214-1245, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rupa Duttagupta & Arvind Panagariya, 2007. "Free Trade Areas And Rules Of Origin: Economics And Politics," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(2), pages 169-190, July.
    2. Peter Egger & Horst Raff, 2015. "Tax rate and tax base competition for foreign direct investment," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 22(5), pages 777-810, October.
    3. Jagdambe, Subhash & Kannan, Elumalai, 2020. "Effects of ASEAN-India Free Trade Agreement on agricultural trade: The gravity model approach," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    4. Dmitriy Aleksandrovich Izotov, 2021. "Trade Integration in the Asia-Pacific Region: Decomposition of Effects," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 1, pages 66-96.
    5. Mr. Enzo Croce & Mr. V. Hugo Juan-Ramon & Mr. Feng Zhu, 2004. "Performance of Western Hemisphere Trading Blocs: A Cost-Corrected Gravity Approach," IMF Working Papers 2004/109, International Monetary Fund.
    6. Kamal Saggi, 2014. "Regional exhaustion of intellectual property," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 10(1), pages 125-137, March.
    7. Winters, L. Alan, 1996. "Regionalism versus Multilateralism," CEPR Discussion Papers 1525, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    8. Julian Hinz, 2023. "The ties that bind: geopolitical motivations for economic integration," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 159(1), pages 51-100, February.
    9. Marco Fugazza & Frédéric Robert-Nicoud, 2014. "The “Emulator Effect” of the Uruguay Round on US Regionalism," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(5), pages 1049-1078, November.
    10. Andreas Waldkirch, 2006. "The ‘New Regionalism’: Integration as a Commitment Device for Developing Countries," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 21, pages 397-425.
    11. Richard E. Baldwin, 2011. "Multilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocks on the Path to Global Free Trade," Chapters, in: Miroslav N. Jovanović (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume I, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Philippa Dee & Anne McNaughton, 2013. "Promoting Domestic Reforms through Regionalism," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Services Trade Reform Making Sense of It, chapter 14, pages 381-427, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    13. Shearer, Matthew & Almeida, Juliana & Gutiérrez Jr., Carlos H., 2009. "The Treatment of Agriculture in Regional Trade Agreements in the Americas," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 2715, Inter-American Development Bank.
    14. Costas Hadjiyiannis, 2004. "Common markets and trade liberalization," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(2), pages 484-508, May.
    15. Matthew Shearer & Juliana Salles Almeida & Carlos H. Gutiérrez Jr., 2009. "The Treatment of Agriculture in Regional Trade Agreements in the Americas," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 23538, Inter-American Development Bank.
    16. Satya P. Das & Subhadip Ghosh, 2006. "Endogenous trading bloc formation in a North‐South global economy," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(3), pages 809-830, August.
    17. Ana Mauleon & Huasheng Song & Vincent Vannetelbosch, 2010. "Networks of Free Trade Agreements among Heterogeneous Countries," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 12(3), pages 471-500, June.
    18. Hillman, Arye L., 2003. "Trade Liberalization and Globalization: A Survey," CEPR Discussion Papers 3845, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    19. Wilfred J. Ethier, 2002. "Unilateralism in a Multilateral World," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 112(479), pages 266-292, April.
    20. Ornelas, Emanuel, 2005. "Endogenous free trade agreements and the multilateral trading system," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 471-497, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa02p332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.