IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/11223.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Women as Environmental Leaders: Shifting the Narrative from Vulnerability to Empowerment

Author

Listed:
  • Alsaleh, Adhwaa
  • Borker, Girija
  • Uckat, Hannah Irmela

Abstract

Women are often portrayed in climate discourse as disproportionately vulnerable to environmental change—a reductive framing that, while grounded in evidence, can obscure their agency and leadership in shaping climate resilience. This paper addresses that gap by exploring how gendered experience equips women to lead effective climate action. It examines two interrelated drivers of women’s climate leadership: (1) the heightened impact of climate shocks, such as displacement, food insecurity, and health risks, on women, which fuels women and catalyzes adaptation efforts; and (2) the distinctive competencies women develop through their social roles, such as long-term orientation, risk aversion, and prosocial behavior, which align with the demands of climate leadership. The paper presents a narrative review of interdisciplinary literature and develops a new conceptual model, the Climate Leadership Readiness Framework (CLRF), which distills the skillset required for effective climate leadership. The framework is used to assess women’s leadership potential across five domains: leadership, principles, skills, knowledge, and networks. Three spheres of transformation—practical, political, and personal—are applied to map where women are currently leading within the climate space and where institutional and policy support can unlock greater impact. The study finds that women are uniquely equipped to and already play an active role in climate action, although it is often underrecognized. By reframing women not as passive victims but as strategic actors, the paper offers a conceptual and policy-relevant lens for advancing inclusive climate governance. Embedding women’s leadership in climate strategies is not only an equity imperative, but also central to achieving durable and effective climate resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Alsaleh, Adhwaa & Borker, Girija & Uckat, Hannah Irmela, 2025. "Women as Environmental Leaders: Shifting the Narrative from Vulnerability to Empowerment," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11223, The World Bank.
  • Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:11223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099230409302519887/pdf/IDU-792099fc-a475-4c00-918c-ce2e453f4029.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aaron M. McCright & Riley E. Dunlap, 2013. "Bringing ideology in: the conservative white male effect on worry about environmental problems in the USA," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 211-226, February.
    2. Yi‐Wen Kung & Sue‐Huei Chen, 2012. "Perception of Earthquake Risk in Taiwan: Effects of Gender and Past Earthquake Experience," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(9), pages 1535-1546, September.
    3. Muriel Niederle & Lise Vesterlund, 2011. "Gender and Competition," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 3(1), pages 601-630, September.
    4. Anderson, Siwan & Eswaran, Mukesh, 2009. "What determines female autonomy? Evidence from Bangladesh," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 179-191, November.
    5. Esther Duflo, 2012. "Women Empowerment and Economic Development," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 50(4), pages 1051-1079, December.
    6. Raghabendra Chattopadhyay & Esther Duflo, 2004. "Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 72(5), pages 1409-1443, September.
    7. Rachel Croson & Uri Gneezy, 2009. "Gender Differences in Preferences," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(2), pages 448-474, June.
    8. Wim Kellens & Teun Terpstra & Philippe De Maeyer, 2013. "Perception and Communication of Flood Risks: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 24-49, January.
    9. Mavisakalyan, Astghik & Tarverdi, Yashar, 2019. "Gender and climate change: Do female parliamentarians make difference?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 151-164.
    10. Gideon Rosenthal & František Váša & Alessandra Griffa & Patric Hagmann & Enrico Amico & Joaquín Goñi & Galia Avidan & Olaf Sporns, 2018. "Mapping higher-order relations between brain structure and function with embedded vector representations of connectomes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Iuliana Armaş & Eugen Avram, 2009. "Perception of flood risk in Danube Delta, Romania," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 50(2), pages 269-287, August.
    12. Aysen Simsek Kandemir & Ramshah Rashid Lone & Rasim Simsek, 2024. "Women in Parliaments and Environmentally Friendly Fiscal Policies: A Global Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-27, September.
    13. Lori M. Hunter & Alison Hatch & Aaron Johnson, 2004. "Cross‐National Gender Variation in Environmental Behaviors," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 85(3), pages 677-694, September.
    14. Gloria Otieno & Wesley Mlsna Zebrowski & John Recha & Travis William Reynolds, 2021. "Gender and Social Seed Networks for Climate Change Adaptation: Evidence from Bean, Finger Millet, and Sorghum Seed Systems in East Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chi Trieu, 2023. "Who’s who: how uncertainty about the favored group affects outcomes of affirmative action," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 9(2), pages 252-292, December.
    2. Bhalotra, Sonia & Clots-Figueras, Irma & Iyer, Lakshmi, 2013. "Path-Breakers: How Does Women’s Political Participation Respond to Electoral Success?," Economics Discussion Papers 9008, University of Essex, Department of Economics.
    3. Chauvin, Juan Pablo & Tricaud, Clemence, 2022. "Gender and Electoral Incentives: Evidence from Crisis Response," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 12411, Inter-American Development Bank.
    4. Peveri, Julieta & Sangnier, Marc, 2023. "Gender differences in re-contesting decisions: New evidence from French municipal elections," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 574-594.
    5. Stanislao Maldonado, 2024. "Empowering women through multifaceted interventions: long-term evidence from a double matching design," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 37(1), pages 1-44, March.
    6. Matthias Doepke & Michèle Tertilt, 2019. "Does female empowerment promote economic development?," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 309-343, December.
    7. Vincenzo Galasso & Tommaso Nannicini, 2025. "Persuasion and gender: experimental evidence from two political campaigns," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 183-204, April.
    8. Hessami, Zohal & da Fonseca, Mariana Lopes, 2020. "Female political representation and substantive effects on policies: A literature review," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    9. Nigus, Halefom Yigzaw & Abay, Kibrom A., 2024. "Cooperation among community leaders: The role of women’s leadership and exposure to conflict," IFPRI discussion papers 2273, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    10. Paula Pereda & Maria Dolores Montoya Diaz & Fabiana Rocha & Liz Matsunaga & Bruna Pugialli Borges & Jesus Mena-Chalco & Renata Narita & Clara Brenck, 2023. "Are women less persistent? Evidence from submissions to a nationwide meeting of economics," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 1757-1768, April.
    11. Zhang, Y. Jane, 2013. "Culture and the Gender Gap in Competitive Inclination: Evidence from the Communist Experiment in China," MPRA Paper 47356, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Bhalotra, Sonia R. & Clots-Figueras, Irma & Iyer, Lakshmi, 2013. "Path-Breakers: How Does Women's Political Participation Respond to Electoral Success?," IZA Discussion Papers 7771, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Maria Rosaria Carillo & Valentina Chiariello & Rita De Siano & Luca Pennacchio, 2025. "Foreign Aid and Corruption: Do Women Make the Difference?," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 11(1), pages 103-151, March.
    14. Klaus Abbink & Asadul Islam & Chau Nguyen, 2016. "Whose voice matters? An experimental examination of women empowerment in microfinance," Monash Economics Working Papers 40-16, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    15. Hossain, Mahbub & Asadullah, M. Niaz & Kambhampati, Uma, 2019. "Empowerment and life satisfaction: Evidence from Bangladesh," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 170-183.
    16. Fang,Sheng & Goh,Chorching & Roberts,Mark & Xu,L. Colin & Zeufack,Albert G., 2020. "Female Business Leaders, Business and Cultural Environment, and Productivity around the World," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9275, The World Bank.
    17. Kevin Fox Gotham & Richard Campanella & Katie Lauve‐Moon & Bradford Powers, 2018. "Hazard Experience, Geophysical Vulnerability, and Flood Risk Perceptions in a Postdisaster City, the Case of New Orleans," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(2), pages 345-356, February.
    18. Zelu, Barbara Ama & Iranzo, Susana & Perez-Laborda, Alejandro, 2024. "Financial inclusion and women economic empowerment in Ghana," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    19. repec:ash:wpaper:104 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Joseph Keneck‐Massil & Iliassou Nkariepoun‐Njoya & Bernard Clery Nomo‐Beyala, 2024. "Does women's political empowerment matter in military spending?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(2), pages 316-350, May.
    21. Arohi Anand & Animesh Karn & Avirup Mukherjee & Naboshree Bhattacharya, 2025. "Does earning money empower women? Evidence from India," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:11223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roula I. Yazigi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dvewbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.