IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vnm/wpdman/225.html

Organizing in a fluid social media sphere: the empowering and disempowering effects of ownership, openness, and stakeholder engagement through an affordance perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Costanza Sartoris

    (Venice School of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venice)

  • Lydia Milly Certa

    (NEOMA Business School)

  • Sasha Piccione

    (IMT Atlantique and Venice School of Management, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice)

Abstract

Examining social media architecture and affordances, this paper explores three key dimensions central to the functioning of social media in democratic societies: ownership, openness, and stakeholder engagement. The aim is to propose a new research agenda that bridges critical management and organizational studies with social media studies, examining how the architectural ownership choices of certain social media platforms shape the intertwined dimensions of openness and stakeholder engagement. First, it briefly defines what social media platforms afford in the public sphere. Afterwards, it examines openness and stakeholder engagement as fluid organizing principles adopted by users on social media platforms. Then it explores how social media ownership can lead to either empowering or disempowering effects on the community of users. Lastly, it offers a list of research questions for potential paths forward in empirical research.

Suggested Citation

  • Costanza Sartoris & Lydia Milly Certa & Sasha Piccione, 2025. "Organizing in a fluid social media sphere: the empowering and disempowering effects of ownership, openness, and stakeholder engagement through an affordance perspective," Working Papers 07, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    • Handle: RePEc:vnm:wpdman:225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.unive.it/web/fileadmin/user_upload/dipartimenti/DMAN/pubblicazioni_scientifiche/working_papers/2025/2025wp07.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2025
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Quinn Maya Kinzer, 2025. "Policy and Platforms: Sex Workers' Labor Experiences Under Changing Online Regulation," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(6), pages 2369-2384, November.
    2. Manuel Castells, 2008. "The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 616(1), pages 78-93, March.
    3. Matthias Wenzel & Hannah Trittin-Ulbrich & Laura Marie Edinger-Schons & Itziar Castelló & Frank G.A. de Bakker, 2025. "Toward Holistic Stakeholder Engagement: Integrating Participation, Inclusion, and Democracy," Post-Print hal-05361242, HAL.
    4. Gorwa, Robert, 2019. "What is Platform Governance?," SocArXiv fbu27, Center for Open Science.
    5. Steinsson, Sverrir, 2024. "Rule Ambiguity, Institutional Clashes, and Population Loss: How Wikipedia Became the Last Good Place on the Internet," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 118(1), pages 235-251, February.
    6. Dalle, Jean-Michel & Jullien, Nicolas, 2003. "'Libre' software: turning fads into institutions?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 1-11, January.
    7. Sheen S. Levine & Michael J. Prietula, 2014. "Open Collaboration for Innovation: Principles and Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1414-1433, October.
    8. repec:osf:socarx:fbu27_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Scherer, Andreas Georg & Neesham, Cristina & Schoeneborn, Dennis & Scholz, Markus, 2023. "New Challenges to the Enlightenment: How Twenty-First-Century Sociotechnological Systems Facilitate Organized Immaturity and How to Counteract It," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(3), pages 409-439, July.
    10. Castelló, Itziar & Lopez-Berzosa, David, 2023. "Affects in Online Stakeholder Engagement: A Dissensus Perspective," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(1), pages 180-215, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eric Darmon & Dominique Torre, 2010. "Open source, dual licensing and software compétition," Post-Print halshs-00497623, HAL.
    2. Francesco Rullani, 2005. "The Debate and the Community. “Reflexive Identity” in the FLOSS Community," LEM Papers Series 2005/18, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    3. Gauguier, Jean-Jacques, 2009. "L’industrialisation de l’Open Source," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/4388 edited by Toledano, Joëlle.
    4. Gawer, Annabelle & Harracá, Martín, 2025. "Inconsistent platform governance and social contagion of misconduct in digital ecosystems: A complementors perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(8).
    5. Jean-Michel Dalle & Paul A. David, 2007. "“It Takes All Kinds”: A Simulation Modeling Perspective on Motivation and Coordination in Libre Software Development Projects," Discussion Papers 07-024, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
    6. Simon Hartmann & Thomas Lindner & Jakob Müllner & Jonas Puck, 2022. "Beyond the nation-state: Anchoring supranational institutions in international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 1282-1306, August.
    7. Gallus, Jana & Bhatia, Sudeep, 2020. "Gender, power and emotions in the collaborative production of knowledge: A large-scale analysis of Wikipedia editor conversations," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 115-130.
    8. Harison, Elad & Koski, Heli, 2006. "Innovative Software Business Strategies: Evidence from Finnish Firms," Discussion Papers 1042, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    9. Mohammad Bagher Arayesh & Mostafa Rezaeirad & Mohammad Aidi & Tohfeh Ghobadi Lamuki, 2022. "Modeling the platform-based banking in commercial banks of Iran," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(4), pages 351-367, December.
    10. Oliver Schilke & Sheen S. Levine & Olenka Kacperczyk & Lynne G. Zucker, 2019. "Call for Papers-Special Issue on Experiments in Organizational Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 232-234, February.
    11. Zhenxiang Chen, 2025. "From Identity Integration to Civic Integration: A Multidimensional Framework of Integration to Unveil Pathways to Civic Engagement Through the Global Perspective," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 25-51, March.
    12. Siobhán O’Mahony, 2007. "The governance of open source initiatives: what does it mean to be community managed?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 11(2), pages 139-150, May.
    13. David Ongenaert, 2019. "Refugee Organizations’ Public Communication: Conceptualizing and Exploring New Avenues for an Underdeveloped Research Subject," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 195-206.
    14. Chang Zhang & Lexuan Wang, 2025. "Virtual Worlds, Real Politics: A Cross‐National Comparative Study of Metaverse Policy Approaches," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    15. Paola Giuri & Gaia Rocchetti & Salvatore Torrisi, 2002. "Open Source Software: From Open Science to New Marketing Models," LEM Papers Series 2002/23, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    16. Pénin, Julien & Wack, Jean-Pierre, 2008. "Research tool patents and free-libre biotechnology: A suggested unified framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1909-1921, December.
    17. Gerald C. Kane & Sam Ransbotham, 2016. "Content as Community Regulator: The Recursive Relationship Between Consumption and Contribution in Open Collaboration Communities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1258-1274, October.
    18. Daniel Mietchen, 2014. "The Transformative Nature of Transparency in Research Funding," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-3, December.
    19. Toxopeus, Helen & Polzin, Friedemann & Cai, Wanxiang & Huisman, Ronald, 2025. "Investor types and campaign dynamics in investment crowdfunding: A herding and collective action perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(9).
    20. Gold, E. Richard, 2021. "The fall of the innovation empire and its possible rise through open science," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(5).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vnm:wpdman:225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daria Arkhipova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mdvenit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.