IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v32y2025i6p2369-2384.html

Policy and Platforms: Sex Workers' Labor Experiences Under Changing Online Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Quinn Maya Kinzer

Abstract

In an increasingly digital world, online platforms play an important role in setting laborers' working conditions. Yet, as new internet regulation is proposed, the interplay between policy, platforms, and working conditions remains unclear. An example of this is FOSTA‐SESTA—a 2018 federal law aimed at ending sex trafficking—that disrupted the sex worker industry by altering regulation on platforms. I perform a qualitative analysis of interviews from a recent sex‐worker‐led podcast (N = 23) to investigate how they describe the impact of FOSTA‐SESTA on their working conditions. I support the primary investigation with an archival analysis of public documents from platforms showing their responsiveness to the legislative change. The findings from this study reveal workers are exposed to greater financial precarity after FOSTA‐SESTA stemming from increased policing by platforms and payment processors, ultimately threatening workers' safety. Using a theoretical framework on sex work laws in norm setting which has been applied in geographically bounded contexts, I also consider how FOSTA‐SESTA shapes cultural norms that conflate all sex work as trafficking. Specifically, I show the breadth of the internet has allowed the sex‐abolitionist criminal positioning of the US to permeate broadly, affecting banks that work with online platforms and shaping platforms attitudes and punitive responses to sex workers globally. Finally, I provide methodological contributions for future research utilizing podcasts as data in balancing the ethical tradeoffs and benefits for studying hard‐to reach populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Quinn Maya Kinzer, 2025. "Policy and Platforms: Sex Workers' Labor Experiences Under Changing Online Regulation," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(6), pages 2369-2384, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:32:y:2025:i:6:p:2369-2384
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.70014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70014
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.70014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Trang Thi Quynh Dinh & Janne Tienari, 2022. "Brothers and broken dreams: Men, masculinity, and emotions in platform capitalism," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 609-625, March.
    2. Jon Kleinberg & Jens Ludwig & Sendhil Mullainathan & Cass R. Sunstein, 2019. "Discrimination In The Age Of Algorithms," NBER Working Papers 25548, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Rachel Keighley & Teela Sanders, 2024. "The Eyes and Ears of Sexual Exploitation Online: Are Sex Buyers Part of the Prevention Puzzle to Reduce Harms in the Online Sex Industry?," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 64(5), pages 1131-1149.
    4. Will Sutherland & Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi & Michael Dunn & Sarah Beth Nelson, 2020. "Work Precarity and Gig Literacies in Online Freelancing," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(3), pages 457-475, June.
    5. Ronald Weitzer, 2007. "The Social Construction of Sex Trafficking: Ideology and Institutionalization of a Moral Crusade," Politics & Society, , vol. 35(3), pages 447-475, September.
    6. Cecilia Benoit & Nadia Ouellet & Mikael Jansson & Samantha Magnus & Michaela Smith, 2017. "Would you think about doing sex for money? Structure and agency in deciding to sell sex in Canada," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 31(5), pages 731-747, October.
    7. Cunningham, Stewart & Sanders, Teela & Scoular, Jane & Campbell, Rosie & Pitcher, Jane & Hill, Kathleen & Valentine-Chase, Matt & Melissa, Camille & Aydin, Yigit & Hamer, Rebecca, 2018. "Behind the screen: Commercial sex, digital spaces and working online," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 47-54.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Costanza Sartoris & Lydia Milly Certa & Sasha Piccione, 2025. "Organizing in a fluid social media sphere: the empowering and disempowering effects of ownership, openness, and stakeholder engagement through an affordance perspective," Working Papers 07, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    2. Wilp, Susanne Bleier, 2026. "The Future of Sex Work Legal Models, Platform Economy, and Labour Organisation in International Comparison. A Theoretical Synthesis," SocArXiv uc57b_v1, Center for Open Science.
    3. Wilp, Susanne Bleier, 2026. "Die Zukunft der Sexarbeit. Rechtsmodelle, Plattformökonomie und Arbeitsorganisation im internationalen Vergleich. Eine theoretische Synthese," SocArXiv df43j_v1, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabrizia Santini & Roberto Ippoliti, 2025. "A hybrid legislative model for the sex market: policy and fiscal insights," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 501-525, December.
    2. Fumin Li & Yisu Zhou & Tianji Cai, 2025. "Periodicity of sex worker touring: an image-assisted analysis," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 1-34, August.
    3. Yeela Lahav Raz, 2025. "The Sex Work Governance Odyssey: The Israeli Velvet Triangle and the Adoption of the End Demand Policy," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(5), pages 2051-2061, September.
    4. Treena Orchard & Katherine Salter & Mary Bunch & Cecilia Benoit, 2020. "Money, Agency, and Self-Care among Cisgender and Trans People in Sex Work," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Ishizaka, Alessio & Gupta, Manish & Shankar, Amit, 2022. "Gamification and gigification: A multidimensional theoretical approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1378-1393.
    6. Chacon, Alvaro & Kausel, Edgar E. & Reyes, Tomas & Trautmann, Stefan, 2025. "Preventing algorithm aversion: People are willing to use algorithms with a learning label," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    7. Philip Hancock & Melissa Tyler & Mark Godiva, 2021. "Thursday Night and a Sing-along ‘Sung Alone’: The Experiences of a Self-employed Performer During the Pandemic," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(6), pages 1155-1166, December.
    8. repec:bcp:journl:v:7:y:2023:i:6:p:410-414 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Ana Alacovska & Eliane Bucher & Christian Fieseler, 2024. "A Relational Work Perspective on the Gig Economy: Doing Creative Work on Digital Labour Platforms," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(1), pages 161-179, February.
    10. Ronald Weitzer, 2014. "New Directions in Research on Human Trafficking," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 653(1), pages 6-24, May.
    11. Kline, Patrick & Walters, Christopher, 2019. "Audits as Evidence: Experiments, Ensembles, and Enforcement," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt3z72m9kn, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    12. Bill McCarthy & Mikael Jansson & Cecilia Benoit, 2021. "Job Attributes and Mental Health: A Comparative Study of Sex Work and Hairstyling," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21, January.
    13. Alexander Norfolk & Helga Hallgrimsdottir, 2019. "Sex Trafficking at the Border: An Exploration of Anti-Trafficking Efforts in the Pacific Northwest," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-18, May.
    14. Maria Akhtar & Azmat Yar Khan & Aneeqa Zubair, 2026. "Metaverse Insights: Boosting Freelancers’ Performance via Work Flexibility and Career Adaptability in the Lens of Social Cognitive Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 17(1), pages 2531-2554, February.
    15. Lilith Brouwers & Tess Herrmann, 2020. "“We Have Advised Sex Workers to Simply Choose Other Options”—The Response of Adult Service Websites to COVID-19," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, October.
    16. Nancy Worth & E. Alkim Karaagac, 2022. "Accounting for Absences and Ambiguities in the Freelancing Labour Relation," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 113(1), pages 96-108, February.
    17. Holly Patrick-Thomson & Michael Kranert, 2021. "Don’t Work for Free: Online Discursive Resistance to Precarity in Commercial Photography," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(6), pages 1034-1052, December.
    18. Muhammad Junaid Ashraf & Daniela Pianezzi, 2024. "Gender, Money, and Sexuality: An Exploration into the Relational Work of Pakistani Khwajasiras," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(4), pages 1021-1040, August.
    19. Jie Ren & Viju Raghupathi & Wullianallur Raghupathi, 2023. "Exploring Influential Factors in Hiring Freelancers in Online Labor Platforms: An Empirical Study," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    20. Lena Knappert & Boukje Cnossen & Renate Ortlieb, 2025. "Inequality Regimes in Coworking Spaces: How New Forms of Organising (Re)produce Inequalities," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 39(1), pages 43-63, February.
    21. Tuulia Law & Menaka Raguparan, 2020. "‘It’s a Puzzle You Have to Do Every Night’: Performing Creative Problem Solving at Work in the Indoor Canadian Sex Industry," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(3), pages 424-440, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:32:y:2025:i:6:p:2369-2384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.