IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ven/wpaper/202521.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Tracking-Based Green Portfolio Optimization: Bridging Sustainability and Market Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Barro

    (Ca’ Foscari University of Venice)

  • Marco Corazza

    (Ca’ Foscari University of Venice)

  • Gianni Filograsso

    (Ca’ Foscari University of Venice)

Abstract

In this contribution, we discuss how to handle financial and sustainable investment goals, focusing on greenness and ESG features. Sustainable investing has attracted increasing interest with an associated growing commitment to take an active part in investment choices. Among thematic investments, green and energy-related ones have emerged, capturing investors' attention. Non-optimized strategies and traditional portfolio allocation models cannot guarantee the necessary flexibility. To answer this demand, ESG tailored-made allocations should be provided, with the aim of representing the preferences and commitments of investors adequately. This contribution introduces a novel ESG-focused tracking error model to optimize portfolio allocation. We consider two reference benchmarks, accounting for a financial target and an ESG one, respectively. The objective function results in a convex linear combination of the two goals where the parameter λ accounts for the investor's financial and ESG preferences. A symmetric tracking error measure is proposed to replicate the financial benchmark passively, while an asymmetric measure is used to track and possibly outperform the thematic ESG benchmark. Identifying the benchmarks for the two components represents a crucial step and, jointly with the choice of the parameter λ, accounts for the portfolio's overall risk-return and ESG profiles. In the model, the sustainability feature is handled not only with the presence of the ESG benchmark but also with the introduction of dedicated constraints. Namely, a desired minimum level of greenness and a maximum amount of carbon intensity can be accounted for. An application to the EUROSTOXX 600 equity market is presented and discussed for different choices of the parameter λ, representing different sustainability preferences and risk-return profiles. Furthermore, a discussion on the choice of the benchmarks is provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Barro & Marco Corazza & Gianni Filograsso, 2025. "Tracking-Based Green Portfolio Optimization: Bridging Sustainability and Market Performance," Working Papers 2025: 21, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
  • Handle: RePEc:ven:wpaper:2025:21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.unive.it/web/fileadmin/user_upload/dipartimenti/DEC/doc/Pubblicazioni_scientifiche/working_papers/2025/WP_DSE_barro_corazza_filograsso_21_25.pdf
    File Function: First version, anno
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ron Dembo & Dan Rosen, 1999. "The practice of portfolio replication. A practical overview of forward and inverse problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 85(0), pages 267-284, January.
    2. Adriano Koshiyama & Nick Firoozye & Philip Treleaven, 2021. "Generative adversarial networks for financial trading strategies fine-tuning and combination," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(5), pages 797-813, May.
    3. Bolton, Patrick & Kacperczyk, Marcin, 2021. "Do investors care about carbon risk?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 517-549.
    4. Jan De Spiegeleer & Stephan Höcht & Daniel Jakubowski & Sofie Reyners & Wim Schoutens, 2023. "ESG: a new dimension in portfolio allocation," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 827-867, April.
    5. Pástor, Ľuboš & Stambaugh, Robert F. & Taylor, Lucian A., 2021. "Sustainable investing in equilibrium," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 550-571.
    6. Utz, Sebastian & Wimmer, Maximilian & Steuer, Ralph E., 2015. "Tri-criterion modeling for constructing more-sustainable mutual funds," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 331-338.
    7. Steuer, Ralph E. & Utz, Sebastian, 2023. "Non-contour efficient fronts for identifying most preferred portfolios in sustainability investing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 742-753.
    8. Pedersen, Lasse Heje & Fitzgibbons, Shaun & Pomorski, Lukasz, 2021. "Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 572-597.
    9. Rob Bauer & Tobias Ruof & Paul Smeets & Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh, 2021. "Get Real! Individuals Prefer More Sustainable Investments [Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: The case of hypothetical gap in contingent valuation]," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 34(8), pages 3976-4043.
    10. Florian Methling & Rüdiger Nitzsch, 2020. "Tailor-made thematic portfolios: a core satellite optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 76(2), pages 317-331, February.
    11. Gunnar Friede & Timo Busch & Alexander Bassen, 2015. "ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 210-233, October.
    12. Francesco Cesarone & Manuel Luis Martino & Alessandra Carleo, 2022. "Does ESG Impact Really Enhance Portfolio Profitability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-28, February.
    13. Mats Andersson & Patrick Bolton & Frédéric Samama, 2016. "Hedging Climate Risk," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(3), pages 13-32, May.
    14. Hiroshi Konno & Hiroaki Yamazaki, 1991. "Mean-Absolute Deviation Portfolio Optimization Model and Its Applications to Tokyo Stock Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(5), pages 519-531, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giglio, Stefano & Maggiori, Matteo & Stroebel, Johannes & Tan, Zhenhao & Utkus, Stephen & Xu, Xiao, 2025. "Four facts about ESG beliefs and investor portfolios," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    2. Bertelli, Beatrice & Torricelli, Costanza, 2025. "Sustainable optimal stock portfolios: What relationship between sustainability and performance?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(1), pages 323-340.
    3. Lars Hornuf & Gül Yüksel, 2022. "The Performance of Socially Responsible Investments: A Meta-Analysis," CESifo Working Paper Series 9724, CESifo.
    4. Ferriani, Fabrizio, 2023. "Issuing bonds during the Covid-19 pandemic: Was there an ESG premium?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    5. Davide Lauria & W. Brent Lindquist & Stefan Mittnik & Svetlozar T. Rachev, 2022. "ESG-Valued Portfolio Optimization and Dynamic Asset Pricing," Papers 2206.02854, arXiv.org.
    6. Draganac, Dragana & Lu, Kelin, 2025. "Pricing asset beyond financial fundamentals: The impact of prosocial preference and image concerns," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    7. Lioui, Abraham & Tarelli, Andrea, 2022. "Chasing the ESG factor," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    8. Alves, Rómulo & Krüger, Philipp & van Dijk, Mathijs, 2025. "Drawing up the bill: Are ESG ratings related to stock returns around the world?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    9. Fatih Kansoy & Dominykas Stasiulaitis, 2025. "Green Shields: The Role of ESG in Uncertain Times," Economics Series Working Papers 1082, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    10. Francesco Cesarone & Manuel Luis Martino & Federica Ricca & Andrea Scozzari, 2023. "Managing ESG Ratings Disagreement in Sustainable Portfolio Selection," Papers 2312.10739, arXiv.org.
    11. Salo, Ahti & Doumpos, Michalis & Liesiö, Juuso & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2024. "Fifty years of portfolio optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(1), pages 1-18.
    12. Chen, An & Gerick, Leonard & Jin, Zhuo, 2025. "Optimizing portfolios under carbon risk constraints: Setting effective constraints to favor green investments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    13. Armin Varmaz & Christian Fieberg & Thorsten Poddig, 2024. "Portfolio optimization for sustainable investments," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 341(2), pages 1151-1176, October.
    14. Roman Kräussl & Tobi Oladiran & Denitsa Stefanova, 2024. "A review on ESG investing: Investors’ expectations, beliefs and perceptions," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 476-502, April.
    15. Siemroth, Christoph & Hornuf, Lars, 2023. "Why Do Retail Investors Pick Green Investments? A Lab-in-the-Field Experiment with Crowdfunders," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 74-90.
    16. Roy Kouwenberg & Chenglong Zheng, 2023. "A Review of the Global Climate Finance Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-32, January.
    17. Fatih Kansoy & Dominykas Stasiulaitis, 2025. "Green Shields: The Role of ESG in Uncertain Time," Papers 2506.02143, arXiv.org.
    18. Shi, Chunpei & Wei, Yu & Zheng, Yihe & Wang, Zhuo & Wang, Qian, 2024. "Is ESG investment rewarded or just doing good? Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PC).
    19. Dunbar, Kwamie & Treku, Daniel & Sarnie, Robert & Hoover, Jack, 2023. "What does ESG risk premia tell us about mutual fund sustainability levels: A difference-in-differences analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    20. Steven D. Baker & Burton Hollifield & Emilio Osambela, 2022. "Asset Prices and Portfolios with Externalities [Pricedetermination in the EU ETS market: theory and econometric analysis with market fundamentals]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(6), pages 1433-1468.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ven:wpaper:2025:21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sassano Sonia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dsvenit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.