IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/unu/wpaper/wp-2026-4.html

Climate policy as development policy: Leveraging carbon revenues for social protection in low- and middle-income countries

Author

Listed:
  • Katrin Gasior
  • Gemma Wright
  • H. Xavier Jara
  • Daniele Malerba

Abstract

Carbon pricing is widely recognized as a key tool for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. However, if implemented without compensatory measures, it can increase poverty and inequality. The aim of this paper is to examine the role of carbon pricing in generating fiscal space for expanding social protection systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Suggested Citation

  • Katrin Gasior & Gemma Wright & H. Xavier Jara & Daniele Malerba, 2026. "Climate policy as development policy: Leveraging carbon revenues for social protection in low- and middle-income countries," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2026-4, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    • Handle: RePEc:unu:wpaper:wp-2026-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/Publications/Working-paper/PDF/wp2026-4-climate-policy-as-development-policy.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Klenert & Linus Mattauch & Emmanuel Combet & Ottmar Edenhofer & Cameron Hepburn & Ryan Rafaty & Nicholas Stern, 2018. "Making carbon pricing work for citizens," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(8), pages 669-677, August.
    2. Helen Barnes & Gabriel Espi-Sanchis & Murray Leibbrandt & David McLennan & Michael Noble & Jukka Olavi Pirttilä & Wynnona Steyn & Brenton Van Vrede & Gemma Wright, 2021. "Analysis of the Distributional Effects of COVID-19 and State-led Remedial Measures in South Africa," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 14(2), pages 2-31.
    3. Sara Maestre-Andrés & Stefan Drews & Jeroen van den Bergh, 2020. "Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: a review of the literature," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(9), pages 1186-1204, July.
    4. Holly Sutherland & Francesco Figari, 2013. "EUROMOD: the European Union tax-benefit microsimulation model," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 1(6), pages 4-26.
    5. Jesse Lastunen & Antoine de Mahieu & Katrin Gasior & H. Xavier Jara & Jukka Pirttilä, 2024. "Microsimulation of tax-benefit systems in the Global South: a comparative assessment," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2024-35, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    6. World Bank, 2021. "South Africa - Social Assistance Programs and Systems Review," World Bank Publications - Reports 37713, The World Bank Group.
    7. World Bank, 2021. "South Africa Social Assistance Programs and Systems Review," World Bank Publications - Reports 36338, The World Bank Group.
    8. Liddle, Brantley & Huntington, Hillard, 2020. "‘On the Road Again’: A 118 country panel analysis of gasoline and diesel demand," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 151-167.
    9. Ms. Era Dabla-Norris & Mr. Thomas Helbling & Salma Khalid & Hibah Khan & Giacomo Magistretti & Alexandre Sollaci & Mr. Krishna Srinivasan, 2023. "Public Perceptions of Climate Mitigation Policies: Evidence from Cross-Country Surveys," IMF Staff Discussion Notes 2023/002, International Monetary Fund.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bhorat, Haroon & Köhler, Timothy, 2025. "The labour market effects of cash transfers to the unemployed: Evidence from South Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Ricci, Mattia & Dominguez, Ignacio Perez & Van Houtven, Stijn & Hristov, Jordan & Vandyck, Toon, 2026. "Pricing GHG emissions in agriculture: Accounting for trade and fairness for effective climate policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    3. Oskar Lindgren & Erik Elwing & Mikael Karlsson & Sverker C. Jagers, 2024. "Public acceptability of climate-motivated rationing," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Bursens, Floore & De Poli, Silvia & Maier, Sofia & Verbist, Gerlinde, 2026. "Bridging climate and social equity: Progressive carbon tax simulations for Belgium," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    5. Floore Bursens; & Silvia De Poli; & Sofia Maier; & Gerlinde Verbist;, 2025. "Bridging Climate and Social Equity: Progressive Carbon Tax Simulations for Belgium," Working Papers 2503, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    6. Muth, Daniel, 2023. "Pathways to stringent carbon pricing: Configurations of political economy conditions and revenue recycling strategies. A comparison of thirty national level policies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    7. Missbach, Leonard & Steckel, Jan Christoph & Vogt-Schilb, Adrien, 2024. "Cash transfers in the context of carbon pricing reforms in Latin America and the Caribbean," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    8. Charlotte Sophia Bez & Jorge A. Bonilla & Brigitte Castañeda Rodríguez & Jorge H. García & Leonard Missbach & Farah Mohammadzadeh Valencia & Jan Christoph Steckel, 2026. "Reforming Fossil Fuel Subsidies with Citizens' Approval: The Case of Colombia," CESifo Working Paper Series 12583, CESifo.
    9. Sterner, Thomas & Ewald, Jens & Sterner, Erik, 2024. "Economists and the climate," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    10. Douenne, Thomas & Fabre, Adrien, 2020. "French attitudes on climate change, carbon taxation and other climate policies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    11. Linden, Jules & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Sologon, Denisa M., 2024. "The many faces of carbon tax regressivity—Why carbon taxes are not always regressive for the same reason," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    12. Pablo Garcia Guzman & Zsoka Koczan, 2025. "Attitudes to the Green Transition and Willingness to Pay in Emerging Markets: Concerned but Not Paying," Financial and Economic Review, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary), vol. 24(1), pages 5-28.
    13. Jan Behringer & Lukas Endres & Maike Korsinnek, 2025. "Cost perceptions and the support for carbon pricing," IMK Working Paper 226-2025, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    14. Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline, 2022. "Rendre acceptable la nécessaire taxation du carbone. Quelles pistes pour la France ?," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(1), pages 15-53.
    15. Menta, Giorgia & Piccari, Michela & Verheyden, Bertrand, 2024. "How Malleable Are Pro-environmental Preferences? Evidence from a Randomized Survey Experiment," IZA Discussion Papers 17578, IZA Network @ LISER.
    16. Lipari, Francesca & Lázaro-Touza, Lara & Escribano, Gonzalo & Sánchez, Ángel & Antonioni, Alberto, 2024. "When the design of climate policy meets public acceptance: An adaptive multiplex network model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    17. Malerba, Daniele & Roscioli, Federico & Gaentzsch, Anja & Ward, Hauke, 2024. "Changing carbon footprints and the consequent impacts of carbon taxes and cash transfers on poverty and inequality across years: A Peruvian case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    18. Hammerle, Mara & Best, Rohan & Crosby, Paul, 2021. "Public acceptance of carbon taxes in Australia," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    19. Marion Dupoux & Benjamin Ouvrard, 2024. "Harnessing social information to improve public support for Pigouvian taxes," Working Papers 2024-05, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL).
    20. Combet, Emmanuel & Le Treut, Gaëlle & Méjean, Aurélie & Teixeira, Antoine, 2025. "The equity and efficiency trade-off of carbon tax revenue recycling: A re-examination," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:unu:wpaper:wp-2026-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Siméon Rapin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/widerfi.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.