IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucb/calbcd/c00-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Would Collective Action Clauses Raise Borrowing Costs? An Update and Additional Results." Barry Eichengreen and Ashoka Mody. July 2000. Abstract C00-113 "Why Adopt Transparency? The Publication of Central Bank Forecasts

Author

Listed:
  • Petra M. Geraats.

Abstract

This paper updates earlier findings concerning the impact of collective-action clauses on borrowing costs. It has been argued that only in recent quarters have investors focused on the presence of these provisions, and that, given the international financial institutions' newfound resolve to "bail in" investors, they now regard these clauses with trepidation. Extending our data to 1999, we find no evidence of such changes but, rather, the same pattern as before: collective-action clauses raise costs of borrowing for low-rated issuers but reduce them for issuers with high credit ratings. We drop a special case -- Israel -- and show that this has no impact on the results. And we show that the same results hold for sovereign borrowers alone. We argue that these results should reassure those who regard collective action clauses as an important element in the campaign to strengthen the international financial architecture.

Suggested Citation

  • Petra M. Geraats., 2000. "Would Collective Action Clauses Raise Borrowing Costs? An Update and Additional Results." Barry Eichengreen and Ashoka Mody. July 2000. Abstract C00-113 "Why Adopt Transparency? The Publicat," Center for International and Development Economics Research (CIDER) Working Papers C00-114, University of California at Berkeley.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucb:calbcd:c00-114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/groups/iber/wps/cider/c00-114.pdf
    File Function: main text
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eichengreen, Barry & Mody, Ashoka, 1999. "Would Collective Action Clauses Raise Borrowing Costs?," CEPR Discussion Papers 2343, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucb:calbcd:c00-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/debrkus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.