IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sap/wpaper/wp283.html

Technological Sovereignity, Big Tech and the Military-Digital complex

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Crespi
  • Dario Guarascio
  • Jelena Reljic

Abstract

This article reassesses the concept of technological sovereignty and its policy implications in light of the close relationships between US- and China-based digital monopolies (i.e., Big Tech) and their respective military apparatuses. First, we empirically examine the growing influence of the private sector in R&D activities, the increasing centrality of digital technologies within sectoral and technological hierarchies, the emergence of Big Tech firms and their dominance over knowledge, infrastructures, and key technologies such as cloud computing and AI. Second, building on Coveri et al. (2025a), we analyse the mutual dependence between Big Tech and the military apparatus, showing how it reinforces the economic power of the private actors involved, weakens the state’s capacity to act autonomously, and intensifies the subordination of foreign governments dependent on US and Chinese digital platforms. Third, we propose a typology of technological sovereignty that takes into account the degree of technological dependence on Big Tech, the nature of the relationship between states and digital companies, and, consequently, the state’s capacity to align the activities of these companies with its own strategic objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Crespi & Dario Guarascio & Jelena Reljic, 2026. "Technological Sovereignity, Big Tech and the Military-Digital complex," Working Papers in Public Economics 283, Department of Economics and Law, Sapienza University of Rome.
  • Handle: RePEc:sap:wpaper:wp283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.dipecodir.it/wpsap/data/wp283.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cédric Durand & Wiliiam Milberg, 2020. "Intellectual monopoly in global value chains," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 404-429, March.
    2. Martin Conyon & Michael Ellman & Christos N Pitelis & Alan Shipman & Philip R Tomlinson, 2022. "Big Tech Oligopolies, Keith Cowling, and Monopoly Capitalism," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 46(6), pages 1205-1224.
    3. Ugo Pagano & Maria Alessandra Rossi, 2009. "The crash of the knowledge economy," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 33(4), pages 665-683, July.
    4. Lehdonvirta, Vili & Wu, Boxi & Hawkins, Zoe, 2025. "Weaponized interdependence in a bipolar world: How economic forces and security interests shape the global reach of U.S. and Chinese cloud data centres," SocArXiv 6s7dn, Center for Open Science.
    5. Francesco Crespi & Dario Guarascio, 2019. "The demand-pull effect of public procurement on innovation and industrial renewal," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 28(4), pages 793-815.
    6. Cecilia Rikap & Bengt-Åke Lundvall, 2022. "Big tech, knowledge predation and the implications for development," Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 389-416, September.
    7. Yvette To, 2023. "Friends and foes: rethinking the party and Chinese big tech," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 299-314, March.
    8. Martin Kenney & John Zysman, 2020. "The platform economy: restructuring the space of capitalist accumulation," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 13(1), pages 55-76.
    9. Angela Garcia Calvo & Martin Kenney & John Zysman, 2025. "Responding to platform firm power: differing national responses," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 225-239, March.
    10. Edler, Jakob & Blind, Knut & Frietsch, Rainer & Kimpeler, Simone & Kroll, Henning & Lerch, Christian & Reiss, Thomas & Roth, Florian & Schubert, Torben & Schuler, Johanna & Walz, Rainer, 2020. "Technology sovereignty: From demand to concept [Technologiesouveränität: Von der Forderung zum Konzept]," Perspectives – Policy Briefs 02 / 2020, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    11. Guillermo Arenas Díaz & Mariacristina Piva & Marco Vivarelli, 2025. "Artificial intelligence as a method of invention," DISCE - Working Papers del Dipartimento di Politica Economica dipe0052, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    12. Vili Lehdonvirta & Boxi Wú & Zoe Hawkins, 2025. "Weaponised interdependence in a bipolar world: how economic forces and security interests shape the global reach of US and Chinese cloud data centres," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(5), pages 1442-1467, September.
    13. repec:osf:socarx:6s7dn_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Pagano, Ugo, 2026. "The corporation from the Middle Ages to intellectual monopoly capitalism," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22, pages 1-16, January.
    15. Francesco Crespi & Serenella Caravella & Mirko Menghini & Chiara Salvatori, 2021. "European Technological Sovereignty: An Emerging Framework for Policy Strategy," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 56(6), pages 348-354, November.
    16. Andrea Coveri & Claudio Cozza & Dario Guarascio, 2025. "Blurring Boundaries: An Analysis of the Digital Platforms-Military Nexus," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 1632-1663, August.
    17. Lars Gjesvik, 2023. "Private infrastructure in weaponized interdependence," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 722-746, March.
    18. K. Sabeel Rahman & Kathleen Thelen, 2019. "The Rise of the Platform Business Model and the Transformation of Twenty-First-Century Capitalism," Politics & Society, , vol. 47(2), pages 177-204, June.
    19. Di Carlo, Donato & McNamara, Kathleen R. & Moschella, Manuela, 2026. "The new politics of EU industrial policy: from the regulatory state to a transformational state," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 138096, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Valeria Cirillo & Cedric Durand & Dario Guarascio & Joel Rabinovich & Cecilia Rikap, 2025. "Power, Knowledge and Technology in a Finite World," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 1467-1478, August.
    21. Edler, Jakob & Blind, Knut & Kroll, Henning & Schubert, Torben, 2023. "Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy. Defining rationales, ends and means," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    22. Crespi Francesco & Cerra Rosario & Zezza Francesco, 2025. "Coopetitive Technological Sovereignty: A Strategy to Reconcile International Collaboration with Knowledge and Economic Security," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Paradigm, vol. 60(2), pages 73-80.
    23. Kai Jia & Martin Kenney, 2022. "The Chinese platform business group: an alternative to the Silicon Valley model?," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 58-80, January.
    24. Ugo Pagano, 2014. "The crisis of intellectual monopoly capitalism," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 38(6), pages 1409-1429.
    25. Cecilia Rikap & Bengt-Åke Lundvall, 2021. "The Digital Innovation Race," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-89443-6, January.
    26. Calvano, Emilio & Polo, Michele, 2021. "Market power, competition and innovation in digital markets: A survey," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    27. Jacobides, Michael G. & Cennamo, Carmelo & Gawer, Annabelle, 2024. "Externalities and complementarities in platforms and ecosystems: From structural solutions to endogenous failures," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).
    28. Andrea Coveri & Claudio Cozza & Dario Guarascio, 2022. "Monopoly Capital in the time of digital platforms: a radical approach to the Amazon case," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 46(6), pages 1341-1367.
    29. Jakob Edler & Jan Fagerberg, 2017. "Innovation policy: what, why, and how," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(1), pages 2-23.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Coveri & Claudio Cozza & Dario Guarascio, 2025. "Blurring Boundaries: An Analysis of the Digital Platforms-Military Nexus," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 1632-1663, August.
    2. Andrea Coveri & Claudio Cozza & Dario Guarascio, 2021. "Monopoly Capitalism in the Digital Era," Working Papers in Public Economics 209, Department of Economics and Law, Sapienza University of Rome.
    3. Vázquez Rojo, Juan & Visintin, Stefano, 2024. "The US-China race for technological centrality: A network perspective," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 68-83.
    4. Serenella Caravella & Francesco Crespi & Giacomo Cucignatto & Dario Guarascio, 2023. "Technological Sovereignty and Strategic Dependencies: The case of the Photovoltaic Supply Chain," CIMEO Working Paper Series 173, Centre for Investigation and Modelling of Experimental Observations (CIMEO).
    5. Ugo Pagano, 2019. "Proprietà e controllo delle grandi imprese: un’interpretazione del resistibile declino italiano," Department of Economics University of Siena 798, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    6. Tristan Auvray & Cédric Durand & Joel Rabinovich & Cecilia Rikap, 2020. "Financialization's conservation and transformation: from Mark I to Mark II," Working Papers hal-03079425, HAL.
    7. Agnieszka Gehringer, 2025. "China's Outward FDI in the European Union: How Much Geopolitics is in There?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(2), pages 222-234, May.
    8. Benjamin Leroy & Davi Marim & El Ghali Benjelloun & Arthur Rozan Debeaurain & Jean-Michel Dalle, 2026. "The Geoeconomics of Venture Capital An Economic Complexity Approach to Emerging Technological Sovereignty," Papers 2604.09187, arXiv.org.
    9. Céline Baud & Cédric Durand, 2021. "Making profits by leading retailers in the digital transition: A comparative analysis of Carrefour, Amazon and Wal-Mart (1996-2019)," Working Papers hal-03332318, HAL.
    10. repec:hal:cepnwp:hal-03079425 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Francesco Crespi & Nicolò Geri & Dario Guarascio & Enrico Marvasi, 2026. "Can strategicdependenciesharmthe acceleration towardsnet-zerotransition? The caseofthelithium-ionbattery industry," Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre' 0291, Department of Economics - University Roma Tre.
    12. Ugo Pagano & Maria Alessandra Rossi, 2019. "Come sorridere anche noi: Sviluppo economico, accesso alle conoscenze, e riduzione delle diseguaglianze," Department of Economics University of Siena 803, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    13. Francesco Crespi & Niccolo Geri & Dario Guarascio & Enrico Marvasi, 2026. "Can strategic dependencies harm the acceleration towards net-zero transition? The case of the lithium-ion battery industry," LEM Papers Series 2026/10, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    14. Schmitz, Luuk, 2026. "Hierarchies of Adaptation: Corporate Power in Economic Statecraft," SocArXiv gwuce_v1, Center for Open Science.
    15. Tristan Auvray & Cédric Durand & Joel Rabinovich & Cecilia Rikap, 2021. "Corporate financialization’s conservation and transformation: from Mark I to Mark II," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 431-457, December.
    16. Jürgen Essletzbichler & Manuel Scholz-Wäckerle & Lena Gerdes & Hans-Peter Wieland & Christian Dorninger, 2023. "Geographical evolutionary political economy: linking local evolution with uneven and combined development," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(3), pages 543-560.
    17. Dario Guarascio & Jelena Reljic & Giacomo Cucignatto & Giuseppe Celi & Annamaria Simonazzi, 2023. "Between a rock and a hard place. Long-term drivers of EU structural vulnerability," CIMEO Working Paper Series 170, Centre for Investigation and Modelling of Experimental Observations (CIMEO).
    18. Kroll, Henning, 2024. "Policies for industrial development, international collaboration and technological sovereignty: Implications for emerging economies," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 85, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    19. Blind, Knut, 2025. "Standardization and Standards: Safeguards of Technological Sovereignty?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    20. repec:hal:cepnwp:hal-03332318 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Gawer, Annabelle & Harracá, Martín, 2025. "Inconsistent platform governance and social contagion of misconduct in digital ecosystems: A complementors perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(8).
    22. Joel Rabinovich & Niall Reddy, 2024. "Corporate Financialization: A Conceptual Clarification and Critical Review of the Literature," Working Papers PKWP2402, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F5 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy
    • F52 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - National Security; Economic Nationalism
    • F55 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Institutional Arrangements
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sap:wpaper:wp283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Luisa Giuriato (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ecodir.web.uniroma1.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.