IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/report/rp-24-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Meet Them Where They Are: Lessons Learned from the Federal Interagency Working Group on Energy Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Dalbey, Matthew
  • Raimi, Daniel

    (Resources for the Future)

Abstract

The federal Interagency Working Group (IWG) on Coal and Power Plant Communities and Economic Revitalization (informally, the IWG on Energy Communities) was established in 2021 to improve economic conditions in US communities that rely—or have relied—heavily on the coal, oil, and natural gas industries. This report describes the origins of the IWG and its evolution, noting challenges and offering lessons. We describe how, at the local level, changes in the energy system can have profound local economic consequences. Although a raft of new federal programs seek to transform the US energy sector and provide more equitable economic outcomes, numerous barriers make it difficult for fossil fuel–dependent communities to access new federal resources. To bridge this divide, the IWG has sought to address the needs of affected communities, but this work requires significant time and effort to build relationships and work toward solutions. We find that expanding the IWG and providing it with additional resources would improve its ability to enhance economic outcomes in fossil fuel–dependent communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Dalbey, Matthew & Raimi, Daniel, 2024. "Meet Them Where They Are: Lessons Learned from the Federal Interagency Working Group on Energy Communities," RFF Reports 24-22, Resources for the Future.
  • Handle: RePEc:rff:report:rp-24-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rff.org/documents/4697/Report_24-22.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hannah Druckenmiller & Yanjun (Penny) Liao & Sophie Pesek & Margaret Walls & Shan Zhang, 2024. "Removing development incentives in risky areas reduces climate damages and yields co-benefits," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 14(9), pages 901-902, September.
    2. David Popp & Francesco Vona & Myriam Grégoire-Zawilski & Giovanni Marin, 2024. "The Next Wave of Energy Innovation: Which Technologies? Which Skills?," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 18(1), pages 45-65.
    3. Hannah Druckenmiller & Yanjun (Penny) Liao & Sophie Pesek & Margaret Walls & Shan Zhang, 2024. "Removing development incentives in risky areas promotes climate adaptation," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 14(9), pages 936-942, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hitchcock, Ian & Raimi, Daniel, 2024. "Wyoming’s Energy Transformation: Insights from Federal Engagement with Coal Communities," RFF Reports 24-25, Resources for the Future.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gitelman, Lazar & Kozhevnikov, Mikhail & Ditenberg, Maksim, 2024. "Electrification as a factor in replacing hydrocarbon fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    2. Nikolaos Apostolopoulos & Alexandros Kakouris & Panagiotis Liargovas & Petar Borisov & Teodor Radev & Sotiris Apostolopoulos & Sofia Daskou & Eleni Ε. Anastasopoulou, 2023. "Just Transition Policies, Power Plant Workers and Green Entrepreneurs in Greece, Cyprus and Bulgaria: Can Education and Retraining Meet the Challenge?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Buyukyazici, Duygu & Quatraro, Francesco, 2025. "The skill requirements of the circular economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    4. Frattini, Federico Fabio & Vona, Francesco & Bontadini, Filippo & Colantone, Italo, "undated". "The Local Job Multipliers of Green Industrialization," FEEM Working Papers 358792, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    5. Federico Fabio Frattini & Francesco Vona & Filippo Bontadini & Italo Colantone, 2025. "The Local Job Multipliers of Green Industrialization," CESifo Working Paper Series 11939, CESifo.
    6. Belloc, Filippo & Valentini, Edilio, 2024. "Dissecting environmental efficiency: The role of technology adoption and usage," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    7. Sirin, Selahattin Murat & Yilmaz, Berna N., 2024. "Energy transition and non-energy firms’ financial performance: Do markets value capability-based energy transition strategies?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    8. Piotr F. Borowski, 2024. "Innovative Solutions for the Future Development of the Energy Sector," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 297-307.
    9. Eugenie Dugoua & Jacob Moscona, 2025. "The Economics of Climate Innovation: Technology, Climate Policy, and the Clean Energy Transition," CESifo Working Paper Series 12267, CESifo.
    10. Raimi, Daniel & Greenspon, Jacob, 2025. "Finding the Right Fit: What Jobs Offer a Good Match for Fossil Fuel Workers’ Skills?," RFF Working Paper Series 25-06, Resources for the Future.
    11. Antonio Accetturo & Elisabetta Olivieri & Fabrizio Renzi, 2024. "Incentives for dwelling renovations: evidence from a large fiscal programme," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 860, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    12. Eugenie Dugoua & Jacob Moscona, 2025. "The Economics of climate innovation: technology, climate policy, and the clean energy transition," CEP Discussion Papers dp2135, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    13. Grégoire-Zawilski, Myriam & Popp, David, 2024. "Do technology standards induce innovation in environmental technologies when coordination is important?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).
    14. Ben Etheridge & Aitor Irastorza-Fadrique & Michael J. Böhm, 2024. "The impact of labour demand shocks when occupational labour supplies are heterogeneous," IFS Working Papers W24/28, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    15. Zhu, Zhimeng & Hunjra, Ahmed Imran & Alharbi, Samar S. & Zhao, Shikuan, 2025. "Global energy transition under geopolitical risks: An empirical investigation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    16. Dong, Jingrong & Zhang, Wenqing & Chen, Yuke & Li, Tingting, 2024. "Does technological progress mode affect just energy transition? A seemingly unrelated regression analysis based on Chinese provincial panel data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:report:rp-24-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.