IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/report/rp-24-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Wyoming’s Energy Transformation: Insights from Federal Engagement with Coal Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Hitchcock, Ian
  • Raimi, Daniel

    (Resources for the Future)

Abstract

Wyoming is heavily dependent on the extraction of fossil fuels, particularly coal, to support its economy. As the United States seeks to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the federal government has begun to implement policies designed to support fossil fuel–dependent “energy communities.” This report, based on interviews with experts and policymakers at the local, state, and federal levels, examines whether—and to what extent—current federal policies are supporting Wyoming’s goals of an energy transformation to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions.Our interviews and analysis suggest that current federal efforts, while helpful, could do more to boost Wyoming’s communities during the energy transition. A leading cause is the lack of capacity among local and state officials to access the considerable array of federal resources made available through recent legislation. This lack of access has hindered Wyoming’s strategy of developing new technologies that take advantage of the state’s coal resources but avoid the associated emissions. However, some federal efforts, particularly the federal Interagency Working Group on Coal and Power Plant Communities and Economic Revitalization (the “Energy Communities IWG”) and its Wyoming Rapid Response Team (RRT) appear promising and can offer lessons for policymakers seeking to support fossil fuel–dependent communities across the country. In particular, the community-focused approach of the RRT, which emphasizes relationship building, strengthening local governance capacity, and flexibility in program design, can create the conditions that lead to progress in the energy transformation. This progress is particularly notable in Wyoming, where fossil fuels have dominated state economics, culture, and politics for decades.Our main findings are as follows:Wyoming is pursuing a strategy of energy transformation that seeks to continue coal use while developing new technologies that avoid greenhouse gas emissions.The federal IWG, and particularly the Wyoming RRT, has provided useful resources and offers a model for success in place-based policymaking and implementation.Despite the support of the IWG, many local stakeholders still lack the capacity to access complex federal funding opportunities.

Suggested Citation

  • Hitchcock, Ian & Raimi, Daniel, 2024. "Wyoming’s Energy Transformation: Insights from Federal Engagement with Coal Communities," RFF Reports 24-25, Resources for the Future.
  • Handle: RePEc:rff:report:rp-24-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rff.org/documents/4712/Report_24-25_fjUgVyE.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Coglianese, Todd D. Gerarden, and James H. Stock, 2020. "The Effects of Fuel Prices, Environmental Regulations, and Other Factors on U.S. Coal Production, 2008-2016," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    2. Dalbey, Matthew & Raimi, Daniel, 2024. "Meet Them Where They Are: Lessons Learned from the Federal Interagency Working Group on Energy Communities," RFF Reports 24-22, Resources for the Future.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christopher R. Knittel & Konstantinos Metaxoglou & Anson Soderbery & André Trindade, 2022. "Exporting global warming? Coal trade and the shale gas boom," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(3), pages 1294-1333, August.
    2. Max Luke & Priyanshi Somani & Turner Cotterman & Dhruv Suri & Stephen J. Lee, 2020. "No COVID-19 Climate Silver Lining in the US Power Sector," Papers 2008.06660, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    3. Brett Watson & Ian Lange & Joshua Linn, 2023. "Coal demand, market forces, and U.S. coal mine closures," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 61(1), pages 35-57, January.
    4. Gazmararian, Alexander F., 2024. "Fossil fuel communities support climate policy coupled with just transition assistance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    5. Kacker, Kanishka & Lange, Ian, 2022. "Inter-regional coal mine competition in the US: Evidence from rail restrictions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    6. Khan, Khalid & Su, Chi-Wei & Rehman, Ashfaq U., 2021. "Do multiple bubbles exist in coal price?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    7. Adele Morris & Noah Kaufman & Siddhi Doshi, 2020. "Revenue at Risk in Coal-Reliant Counties," NBER Working Papers 27307, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Yin, Yuwei & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2022. "Bottlenecks of LNG supply chain in energy transition: A case study of China using system dynamics simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    9. Bin Xu & Lin Boqiang, 2023. "Investigating the Determinants of the Growth of the New Energy Industry: Using Quantile Regression Approach," The Energy Journal, , vol. 44(2), pages 241-258, March.
    10. Raimi, Daniel & Look, Wesley & Robertson, Molly & Higdon, Jake, 2020. "Economic Development Policies to Enable Fairness for Workers and Communities in Transition," RFF Reports 20-08, Resources for the Future.
    11. Sibande, Xolani & Demirer, Riza & Balcilar, Mehmet & Gupta, Rangan, 2023. "On the pricing effects of bitcoin mining in the fossil fuel market: The case of coal," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    12. Yin, Yuwei & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2022. "Impacts of energy transition on Liquefied Natural Gas shipping: A case study of China and its strategies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 262-274.
    13. Muehlenbachs, Lucija & Staubli, Stefan & Chu, Ziyan, 2021. "The accident externality from trucking: Evidence from shale gas development," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    14. Greenberg, Pierce & Asitibasi, Terence & Bodenhamer, Aysha, 2025. "Coal communities’ views on local economic Futures: Implications for energy transition policy and planning," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    15. Fleten, Stein-Erik & Fram, Benjamin P. & Ullrich, Carl J., 2024. "The reliability pricing model and coal-fired generators in PJM," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    16. Adele C. Morris & Noah Kaufman & Siddhi Doshi, 2020. "Revenue at Risk in Coal-Reliant Counties," NBER Chapters, in: Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, volume 2, pages 83-116, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:report:rp-24-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.