IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/ibrief/ib-26-01.html

Resource Inadequacy: Why a Crucial Component of Keeping the Lights on Is Getting Harder

Author

Listed:
  • Kahn-Lang, Jenya

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Robertson, Molly

    (Resources for the Future)

Abstract

Electric power is an essential resource for households, businesses, and economies, from keeping lights and life support machines on to powering water conveyance and transportation networks. When there is not enough electricity, the resulting outages can be expensive and even deadly, impacting business activity, comfort, and health.One prime example is the electricity shortage event that occurred in Texas in February 2021. Winter storm Uri caused 246 deaths according to official counts (DSHS 2021), primarily due to power outages, with one estimate putting the death toll over 800 (Weber and Buchele 2022; FERC/NERC 2023). The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas estimated the total economic cost of the outages at $4.3 billion (Golding et al. 2021).Power outages resulting from extreme events, like the ones in Texas, are becoming more frequent and severe. The traditional methods for ensuring sufficient power supply and incentivizing new investment were not designed for the range of innovation in electric resources that has emerged or the speed of projected demand growth. In addition, it now takes longer to site, build, and interconnect new resources to the power grid. Beyond threatening reliability, current practices can exacerbate affordability concerns and slow decarbonization.This issue brief offers a primer for policymakers considering reforms to ensure sufficient power supply (“resource adequacy”). While resource adequacy is only one dimension of electric reliability, we focus on it because the complex economic fundamentals that have driven existing resource adequacy market designs are not always fully appreciated.

Suggested Citation

  • Kahn-Lang, Jenya & Robertson, Molly, 2026. "Resource Inadequacy: Why a Crucial Component of Keeping the Lights on Is Getting Harder," RFF Issue Briefs 26-01, Resources for the Future.
    • Handle: RePEc:rff:ibrief:ib-26-01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rff.org/documents/5212/IB_26-01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Joskow & Jean Tirole, 2007. "Reliability and competitive electricity markets," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 38(1), pages 60-84, March.
    2. Severin Borenstein & James Bushnell & Erin Mansur, 2023. "The Economics of Electricity Reliability," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 37(4), pages 181-206, Fall.
    3. Dennis L Buchanan & Mark H A Davis, 2025. "Resource Evaluation," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: METALS AND ENERGY FINANCE Interrelationship between Technical and Financial Risk in Mineral Projects, chapter 7, pages 161-175, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Lo Prete, Chiara & Palmer, Karen & Robertson, Molly, 2025. "Time for a market upgrade? A review of wholesale electricity market designs for the future," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    5. repec:aen:eeepjl:2_2_a02 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Danielian, Armen, 2025. "Regulating electricity spot markets during extreme events: The 2021 Texas case," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    2. Francesco Decarolis, 2026. "Reforming EU Electricy Market Design: PPAS, CFDS, and Long-Term Signals for a Renewable-Dominates System," BAFFI CAREFIN Working Papers 26264, BAFFI CAREFIN, Centre for Applied Research on International Markets Banking Finance and Regulation, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    3. Mario Liebensteiner & Johannes Paha, 2026. "Renewable Investment and Electricity Rationing: Evidence from South Africa," CESifo Working Paper Series 12540, CESifo.
    4. Zuo, Ke Xin & Macey, Joshua C. & Mays, Jacob, 2025. "Revisiting capacity market fundamentals," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    5. Peter Cramton & Steven Stoft, 2006. "The Convergence of Market Designs for Adequate Generating Capacity," Papers of Peter Cramton 06mdfra, University of Maryland, Department of Economics - Peter Cramton, revised 2006.
    6. repec:diw:diwwpp:dp1621 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Finon, Dominique & Meunier, Guy & Pignon, Virginie, 2008. "The social efficiency of long-term capacity reserve mechanisms," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 202-214, September.
    8. Mbéa Bell & Sylvain Dessy, 2017. "Market Power and Instrument Choice in Climate Policy," Cahiers de recherche 1704, Centre de recherche sur les risques, les enjeux économiques, et les politiques publiques.
    9. Keppler, Jan Horst & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2022. "Why the sustainable provision of low-carbon electricity needs hybrid markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    10. Marchetti, Isabella & Rego, Erik Eduardo, 2022. "The impact of hourly pricing for renewable generation projects in Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 601-617.
    11. Simshauser, Paul, 2024. "On static vs. dynamic line ratings in renewable energy zones," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    12. Christina Elberg, 2014. "Cross-Border Effects of Capacity Mechanisms in Electricity Markets," EWI Working Papers 2014-11, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI).
    13. Grimm, Veronika & Schewe, Lars & Schmidt, Martin & Zöttl, Gregor, 2017. "Uniqueness of market equilibrium on a network: A peak-load pricing approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 971-983.
    14. Growitsch, Christian & Just, Lisa & Pedell, Burkhard, 2014. "Risk Assessment of Investments in Energy-only and Capacity Markets," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 68(3), pages 181-188.
    15. Kim, Hyunsook & Kim, Sung-Soo, 2012. "The resource adequacy scheme in the Korean electricity market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 133-144.
    16. Pedro Linares & Xavier Labandeira, 2010. "Energy Efficiency: Economics And Policy," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 573-592, July.
    17. Browne, Oliver & Poletti, Stephen & Young, David, 2015. "How does market power affect the impact of large scale wind investment in 'energy only' wholesale electricity markets?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 17-27.
    18. Leautier, Thomas-Olivier, 2018. "On the long-term impact price caps: Investment, uncertainty, imperfect competition, and rationing," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 53-95.
    19. Spindler, Christian & Woll, Oliver & Schober, Dominik, 2018. "Sharing is not caring: Backward integration of consumers," ZEW Discussion Papers 18-006, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    20. Brunekreeft, Gert & Neuhoff, Karsten & Newbery, David, 2005. "Electricity transmission: An overview of the current debate," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 73-93, June.
    21. Stefan Ambec & Claude Crampes, 2019. "Decarbonizing Electricity Generation with Intermittent Sources of Energy," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(6), pages 1105-1134.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:ibrief:ib-26-01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.