IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/dpaper/dp-26-12.html

Deep-Sea Mining? Exploring Key Trade-Offs for the Energy Transition

Author

Listed:
  • Berman, Gabriella
  • Echavarria, Elizabeth
  • Spiller, Beia

    (Resources for the Future)

Abstract

This paper evaluates deep-sea mining (DSM) from a policy perspective in light of rising critical mineral demand. It assesses the economic, environmental, social, and governance trade-offs between DSM and terrestrial mining, highlighting unresolved questions about ecological harm, commercial viability, benefit sharing, and the long-term substitution of land-based supply. Because DSM is likely to augment rather than displace terrestrial mining, particularly in the short term, it could have important distributional consequences for mining-dependent communities and producer countries. We also examine the unsettled international governance landscape, including ongoing negotiations at the International Seabed Authority (ISA) and growing unilateral national initiatives. We argue that, given the many uncertainties, policymakers should proceed with caution when setting regulatory frameworks for and making decisions about DSM. Furthermore, prioritizing robust environmental standards, equitable distributional rules, and broader mineral strategies centered on demand reduction, recycling, and reform of terrestrial mining governance is key to ensuring a sustainable transition as DSM rules develop.

Suggested Citation

  • Berman, Gabriella & Echavarria, Elizabeth & Spiller, Beia, 2026. "Deep-Sea Mining? Exploring Key Trade-Offs for the Energy Transition," RFF Working Paper Series 26-12, Resources for the Future.
  • Handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-26-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rff.org/documents/5357/WP_24-12_hJx5AZn.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-26-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.