IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/dpaper/dp-26-12.html

Deep-Sea Mining? Exploring Key Trade-Offs for the Energy Transition

Author

Listed:
  • Berman, Gabriella
  • Echavarria, Elizabeth
  • Spiller, Beia

    (Resources for the Future)

Abstract

This paper evaluates deep-sea mining (DSM) from a policy perspective in light of rising critical mineral demand. It assesses the economic, environmental, social, and governance trade-offs between DSM and terrestrial mining, highlighting unresolved questions about ecological harm, commercial viability, benefit sharing, and the long-term substitution of land-based supply. Because DSM is likely to augment rather than displace terrestrial mining, particularly in the short term, it could have important distributional consequences for mining-dependent communities and producer countries. We also examine the unsettled international governance landscape, including ongoing negotiations at the International Seabed Authority (ISA) and growing unilateral national initiatives. We argue that, given the many uncertainties, policymakers should proceed with caution when setting regulatory frameworks for and making decisions about DSM. Furthermore, prioritizing robust environmental standards, equitable distributional rules, and broader mineral strategies centered on demand reduction, recycling, and reform of terrestrial mining governance is key to ensuring a sustainable transition as DSM rules develop.

Suggested Citation

  • Berman, Gabriella & Echavarria, Elizabeth & Spiller, Beia, 2026. "Deep-Sea Mining? Exploring Key Trade-Offs for the Energy Transition," RFF Working Paper Series 26-12, Resources for the Future.
  • Handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-26-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rff.org/documents/5357/WP_24-12_hJx5AZn.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moetai Brotherson & Surangel Whipps Jr, 2025. "A message from island leaders: protect the Pacific Ocean from deep-sea mining," Nature, Nature, vol. 642(8067), pages 299-302, June.
    2. Selina Bezzola & Fritz Brugger & Isabel Günther & Dawit Sebhatu, 2022. "Do Social Investments by Mining Companies Harm Citizen-State Relations? Experimental Evidence from Burkina Faso," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(3), pages 417-435, March.
    3. Cascadden, Maggie & Gunton, Thomas & Rutherford, Murray, 2021. "Best practices for Impact Benefit Agreements," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    4. Toman, Michael A. & Gayatri Kannan, Sangita, 2025. "“Mineral Security” Policy for Electric Vehicle Battery Minerals," RFF Reports 25-06, Resources for the Future.
    5. Conde, Marta, 2017. "Resistance to Mining. A Review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 80-90.
    6. Spiller, Beia & Whitlock, Zach & Kota, Ambarish & DeAngeli, Emma & Lohawala, Nafisa, 2026. "Onshoring the Mineral Supply Chain: Structural Constraints, Policy Tools, and Research Gaps," RFF Reports 26-08, Resources for the Future.
    7. Michael H. Dowd & Victoria E. Assad & Alexus E. Cazares-Nuesser & Jeffrey C. Drazen & Erica Goetze & Angelicque E. White & Brian N. Popp, 2025. "Deep-sea mining discharge can disrupt midwater food webs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-8, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bansal, Sanchita & Singh, Shifali & Nangia, Priya & Chanaliya, Nisha & Sala, Dariusz, 2024. "Sustaining the mining industry through the lens of corporate social responsibility: A review research," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Moe, Lina, 2026. "Compensated centralization: Renewable energy permitting and host community benefits in New York," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    3. Conde, Marta & Anguelovski, Isabelle, 2026. "Why would you move to a polluted area? Green compromise in Coastal Sydney and Illawarra," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    4. Jean-Baptiste Bahers & Paula Higuera & Anne Ventura & Nicolas Antheaume, 2020. "The “Metal-Energy-Construction Mineral” Nexus in the Island Metabolism: The Case of the Extractive Economy of New Caledonia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Okada, Isamu, 2024. "What procedures matter to social acceptance of mining? A conjoint experiment in Peru," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    6. Deanna Kemp & John R. Owen, 2022. "Corporate social irresponsibility, hostile organisations and global resource extraction," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1816-1824, September.
    7. John R. Owen & Deanna Kemp, 2024. "Corporate Responses to Community Grievance: Voluntarism and Pathologies of Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 55-68, January.
    8. Blesia, Jhon Urasti & Dixon, Keith & Lord, Beverley Rae, 2023. "Indigenous experiences and perspectives on a mining corporation's community relations and development activities," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    9. Thakur, Arnav Prakash, 2026. "Critical review of Indian mining laws: Revenue-loss loopholes, illegal extraction pathways, and lessons from global best practice frameworks," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Saenz, Cesar, 2023. "The social management canvas for the mining industry: A Peruvian case study," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    11. Leena Suopajärvi & Karin Beland Lindahl & Toni Eerola & Gregory Poelzer, 2023. "Social aspects of business risk in the mineral industry—political, reputational, and local acceptability risks facing mineral exploration and mining," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 36(2), pages 321-331, June.
    12. Li, Xiongying & Ou, Hongjing & Nie, Puyan, 2024. "Assessment of the relationship between mineral extraction in the southern hemisphere and sustainable development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    13. Sonja Kivinen & Kaarina Vartiainen & Timo Kumpula, 2018. "People and Post-Mining Environments: PPGIS Mapping of Landscape Values, Knowledge Needs, and Future Perspectives in Northern Finland," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-23, December.
    14. Wall, Liz, 2026. "The role of benefit sharing agreements in mine closure: a golden opportunity or a square peg for a round hole?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    15. Shuna Shu Ham Ho & Chang Hoon Oh & Daniel Shapiro, 2024. "Can Corporate Social Responsibility Lead to Social License? A Sentiment and Emotion Analysis," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 445-476, March.
    16. Carballo-Cruz, Francisco & Silva, Luís Filipe, 2026. "Supporting the return of mining? The role of collective memory and perceived impacts in post-extractive communities," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    17. Jackie Lou O. Raborar & Elizabeth O. Recio, 2020. "Perception of host communities on the sustainability of the corporate social responsibility programs of Philippine mining companies: A mixed-method approach," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(2), pages 85-95, March.
    18. Marcellinus Essah, 2022. "Gold mining in Ghana and the UN Sustainable Development Goals: Exploring community perspectives on social and environmental injustices," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 127-138, February.
    19. Gunton, Thomas & Werker, Eric & Markey, Sean, 2021. "Community benefit agreements and natural resource development: Achieving better outcomes," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    20. Andreucci, Diego & Kallis, Giorgos, 2017. "Governmentality, Development and the Violence of Natural Resource Extraction in Peru," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 95-103.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-26-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.