IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/dpaper/dp-25-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Retrospective Analysis of Heavy-Duty Vehicle Tailpipe Nitrogen Oxides Emissions Standards

Author

Listed:
  • Lohawala, Nafisa

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Linn, Joshua

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Bioret, Lucie

    (Resources for the Future)

  • DeAngeli, Emma

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Roy, Nicholas

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Spiller, Beia

    (Resources for the Future)

Abstract

This paper presents a retrospective analysis of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 2007 regulations targeting NOx emissions from heavy-duty vehicles. We replicate EPA’s on-road emissions model and compare the assumptions used in its analysis—vehicle sales, scrappage rates, NOx emission rates, and vehicle use—with actual outcomes in 2022. This comparison evaluates the accuracy of EPA’s assumptions and their long-term impact on NOx reduction estimates, providing a basis to assess the accuracy of the similar methodology used in the recent 2022 standards. We find that EPA’s most significant prediction error was overestimating scrappage rates of older vehicles, which led to underestimated emissions both with and without the policy; on net, this resulted in an underestimation of emissions reductions by 0.52 million tons. Conversely, EPA underestimated miles traveled by older vehicles, which, on net, overestimated emissions reductions, as these high-emission vehicles traveled more than expected. Anticipatory sales effects before 2007 had minimal effects on emissions in 2022. Although certified emissions have consistently been below required standards, this discrepancy had only a minor effect on EPA’s overall emissions predictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Lohawala, Nafisa & Linn, Joshua & Bioret, Lucie & DeAngeli, Emma & Roy, Nicholas & Spiller, Beia, 2025. "A Retrospective Analysis of Heavy-Duty Vehicle Tailpipe Nitrogen Oxides Emissions Standards," RFF Working Paper Series 25-12, Resources for the Future.
  • Handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-25-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rff.org/documents/4879/WP_25-12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vernon, David & Meier, Alan, 2012. "Identification and quantification of principal–agent problems affecting energy efficiency investments and use decisions in the trucking industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 266-273.
    2. Breed, Annelis K. & Speth, Daniel & Plötz, Patrick, 2021. "CO2 fleet regulation and the future market diffusion of zero-emission trucks in Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    3. Jenn, Alan & Azevedo, Inês L. & Ferreira, Pedro, 2013. "The impact of federal incentives on the adoption of hybrid electric vehicles in the United States," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 936-942.
    4. Meredith Fowlie & Stephen P. Holland & Erin T. Mansur, 2012. "What Do Emissions Markets Deliver and to Whom? Evidence from Southern California's NOx Trading Program," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(2), pages 965-993, April.
    5. Thomas G. Wollmann, 2018. "Trucks without Bailouts: Equilibrium Product Characteristics for Commercial Vehicles," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(6), pages 1364-1406, June.
    6. Askin, Amanda C. & Barter, Garrett E. & West, Todd H. & Manley, Dawn K., 2015. "The heavy-duty vehicle future in the United States: A parametric analysis of technology and policy tradeoffs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-13.
    7. George P. Baker & Thomas N. Hubbard, 2003. "Make Versus Buy in Trucking: Asset Ownership, Job Design, and Information," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(3), pages 551-572, June.
    8. Klier, Thomas & Linn, Joshua, 2016. "The effect of vehicle fuel economy standards on technology adoption," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 41-63.
    9. Hammond, William & Axsen, Jonn & Kjeang, Erik, 2020. "How to slash greenhouse gas emissions in the freight sector: Policy insights from a technology-adoption model of Canada," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    10. Maximilian Auffhammer & Ryan Kellogg, 2011. "Clearing the Air? The Effects of Gasoline Content Regulation on Air Quality," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(6), pages 2687-2722, October.
    11. Oreggioni, G.D. & Mahiques, O. & Monforti-Ferrario, F. & Schaaf, E. & Muntean, M. & Guizzardi, D. & Vignati, E. & Crippa, M., 2022. "The impacts of technological changes and regulatory frameworks on global air pollutant emissions from the energy industry and road transport," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    12. Meredith Fowlie & Stephen P. Holland & Erin T. Mansur, 2012. "What Do Emissions Markets Deliver and to Whom? Evidence from Southern California's NOx Trading Program," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(2), pages 965-993, April.
    13. Rittenhouse, Katherine & Zaragoza-Watkins, Matthew, 2018. "Anticipation and environmental regulation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 255-277.
    14. James M. Sallee, 2011. "The Surprising Incidence of Tax Credits for the Toyota Prius," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 3(2), pages 189-219, May.
    15. Traynor, Thomas L & McCarthy, Patrick S, 1991. "Trucking Deregulation and Highway Safety: The Effect of the 1980 Motor Carrier Act," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 339-348, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Wei, 2015. "Costs of a Practice-Based Air Quality Regulation: Dairy Farms in the San Joaquin Valley," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205304, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Adler, David & Severnini, Edson, 2023. "Timing matters: Intra-day shifts of economic activity and ambient ozone concentrations," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    3. Janet Currie & Reed Walker, 2019. "What Do Economists Have to Say about the Clean Air Act 50 Years after the Establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(4), pages 3-26, Fall.
    4. Joseph E. Aldy & Maximilian Auffhammer & Maureen Cropper & Arthur Fraas & Richard Morgenstern, 2022. "Looking Back at 50 Years of the Clean Air Act," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 60(1), pages 179-232, March.
    5. Adler, David & Severnini, Edson, 2020. "Timing Matters: Shifting Economic Activity and Intra-Day Variation in Ambient Ozone Concentrations," IZA Discussion Papers 13428, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Björn Bos & Moritz A. Drupp & Lutz Sager, 2025. "The Distributional Effects of Low Emission Zones: Who Benefits from Cleaner Air?," CESifo Working Paper Series 11739, CESifo.
    7. Mérel, Pierre & Smith, Aaron & Williams, Jeffrey & Wimberger, Emily, 2014. "Cars on crutches: How much abatement do smog check repairs actually provide?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 371-395.
    8. Muehlegger, Erich & Rapson, David, 2018. "Understanding the Distributional Impacts of Vehicle Policy: Who Buys New and Used Alternative Vehicles?," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0tn4m2tx, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    9. Aldy, Joseph E. & Auffhammer, Maximillian & Cropper, Maureen L. & Fraas, Arthur G. & Morgenstern, Richard D., 2020. "Looking Back at Fifty Years of the Clean Air Act," RFF Working Paper Series 20-01, Resources for the Future.
    10. Antonio M. Bento & Noah Miller & Mehreen Mookerjee & Edson Severnini, 2023. "Incidental Adaptation: The Role of Non-climate Regulations," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 86(3), pages 305-343, November.
    11. Jonathan M. Lee, 2015. "The Impact of Heterogeneous NOx Regulations on Distributed Electricity Generation in U.S. Manufacturing," Working Papers 15-12, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    12. Kube, Roland & von Graevenitz, Kathrine & Löschel, Andreas & Massier, Philipp, 2019. "Do voluntary environmental programs reduce emissions? EMAS in the German manufacturing sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(S1).
    13. Löschel, Andreas & Lutz, Benjamin Johannes & Managi, Shunsuke, 2019. "The impacts of the EU ETS on efficiency and economic performance – An empirical analyses for German manufacturing firms," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 71-95.
    14. Na Zhang & Jinqian Deng & Fayyaz Ahmad & Muhammad Umar Draz & Nabila Abid, 2023. "The dynamic association between public environmental demands, government environmental governance, and green technology innovation in China: evidence from panel VAR model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 9851-9875, September.
    15. Lucas W. Davis & Christopher R. Knittel, 2019. "Are Fuel Economy Standards Regressive?," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(S1), pages 37-63.
    16. Themann, Michael & Koch, Nicolas, 2021. "Catching up and falling behind: Cross-country evidence on the impact of the EU ETS on firm productivity," Ruhr Economic Papers 904, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    17. Chu, Baoju & Dong, Yizhe & Liu, Yaorong & Ma, Diandian & Wang, Tianju, 2024. "Does China's emission trading scheme affect corporate financial performance: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    18. Qiu, Zhaoxuan & Li, Jincheng & Liu, Bei & Jin, Meilin & Wang, Jinmin, 2025. "How does energy quota trading affect the corporate pollution gap? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    19. Mathias Reynaert, 2021. "Abatement Strategies and the Cost of Environmental Regulation: Emission Standards on the European Car Market," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(1), pages 454-488.
    20. Ohyun Kwon & Hao Zhao & Min Qiang Zhao, 2021. "The Reallocation Effect of Emissions Cap-and-Trade: Evidence from China," School of Economics Working Paper Series 2021-13, LeBow College of Business, Drexel University.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-25-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.