IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/dpaper/dp-16-08.html

Incentives, Green Preferences, and Private Provision of Impure Public Goods

Author

Listed:
  • Wichman, Casey J.

    (Resources for the Future)

Abstract

Pro-environmental preferences are being used increasingly as environmental policy tools. In this paper, I consider the role of heterogeneous green preferences for private provision of environmental goods that have both private and public characteristics. Under diff erent assumptions of information available to a regulator, I characterize equilibrium properties of several mechanisms. I find incentive-compatible Nash equilibria that provide socially optimal public goods provision when the regulator can enforce individual consumption contracts, as well as when reported consumption contracts are supplemented with group penalties. The role of budget balancing is recast as a policy intervention for correcting environmental market failures. Throughout the paper, I ground the exposition with examples of consumer behavior in the context of green electricity programs and goal setting for energy conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • Wichman, Casey J., 2016. "Incentives, Green Preferences, and Private Provision of Impure Public Goods," RFF Working Paper Series dp-16-08, Resources for the Future.
    • Handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-16-08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rff.org/RFF/documents/RFF-DP-16-08.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tilman, Andrew R. & Haight, Robert G., 2025. "Public policy for management of forest pests within an ownership mosaic," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    2. Andrew R. Tilman & Robert G. Haight, 2023. "Public policy for management of forest pests within an ownership mosaic," Papers 2312.05403, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    3. Qiao, Kunyuan & Dowell, Glen, 2022. "Environmental concerns, income inequality, and purchase of environmentally-friendly products: A longitudinal study of U.S. counties (2010-2017)," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(4).
    4. Andreas Niedermayr & Lena Schaller & Petr Mariel & Pia Kieninger & Jochen Kantelhardt, 2018. "Heterogeneous Preferences for Public Goods Provided by Agriculture in a Region of Intensive Agricultural Production: The Case of the Marchfeld," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Mutascu, Mihai & Horky, Florian & Strango, Cristina, 2023. "Good or bad? Digitalisation and green preferences," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    6. Ho, Chinh Q., 2022. "Can MaaS change users’ travel behaviour to deliver commercial and societal outcomes?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 76-97.
    7. Gangqiang Yang & Yongyu Xue & Yuxi Ma, 2019. "Social Organization Participation, Government Governance and the Equalization of Basic Public Services: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Montoya-Villalobos, Maria J., 2023. "Green consumption: The role of confidence and pessimism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    9. James Wesley Burnett & Christopher Mothorpe, 2018. "An Economic Assessment of the Southern Atlantic Coastal Region’s Stormwater Management Practices," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(04), pages 1-38, October.
    10. Maria José Montoya Villalobos, 2021. "Green consumption: The impact of trust and pessimism," EconomiX Working Papers 2021-9, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    11. Huang, Ruting & Duan, Shanshan & Li, Xiyan, 2025. "Environmental regulation and intra-firm wage inequality: A skill premium perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    12. Xiaoyan Wang & Weiwei Zhang, 2022. "Taxes Versus Tradable Permits Considering Public Environmental Awareness," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 293-315, July.
    13. Jiang, Bixia & Bai, Xu & You, Weijia & Fan, Kun, 2021. "Where and how to launch your forestry crowdfunding campaign? Evidence from China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-16-08. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.