IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/red/sed019/1470.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Alternative Solution Method for Continuous-Time Heterogeneous Agent Models with Aggregate Shocks

Author

Listed:
  • Nobuhide Okahata

    (Ohio State University)

Abstract

The increasing availability of micro data has led researchers to develop increasingly rich heterogeneous agent models. Solving these models involves nontrivial computational costs. The continuous-time solution method proposed by Ahn, Kaplan, Moll, Winberry, and Wolf (NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2017, volume 32) is dramatically fast, making feasible the solution of heterogeneous agent models with aggregate shocks by applying local perturbation and dimension reduction. While this computational innovation contributes enormously to expanding the research frontier, the essential reliance on the local linearization limits a class of problems researchers can investigate to the one where certainty equivalence with respect to aggregate shocks holds. This implies that it may be unsuitable for analyzing models where large aggregate shocks exist or nonlinearity matters. To resolve this issue, I propose an alternative solution method for continuous-time heterogeneous agent models with aggregate shocks by extending the Backward Induction method originally developed for discrete time models by Reiter (2010). The proposed method is nonlinear and global with respect to both idiosyncratic and aggregate shocks. I apply this method to solve a Krusell and Smith (1998) economy and evaluate its performance along two dimensions: accuracy and computation speed. I find that the proposed method is accurate even with large aggregate shocks and high curvature without surrendering computation speed (the baseline economy is solved within a few seconds). This new method is also applied to a model with recursive utility and an Overlapping Generations (OLG) model, and it is able to solve both models quickly and accurately.

Suggested Citation

  • Nobuhide Okahata, 2019. "An Alternative Solution Method for Continuous-Time Heterogeneous Agent Models with Aggregate Shocks," 2019 Meeting Papers 1470, Society for Economic Dynamics.
  • Handle: RePEc:red:sed019:1470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://red-files-public.s3.amazonaws.com/meetpapers/2019/paper_1470.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boppart, Timo & Krusell, Per & Mitman, Kurt, 2018. "Exploiting MIT shocks in heterogeneous-agent economies: the impulse response as a numerical derivative," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 68-92.
    2. Den Haan, Wouter J. & Rendahl, Pontus, 2010. "Solving the incomplete markets model with aggregate uncertainty using explicit aggregation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 69-78, January.
    3. SeHyoun Ahn & Greg Kaplan & Benjamin Moll & Thomas Winberry & Christian Wolf, 2018. "When Inequality Matters for Macro and Macro Matters for Inequality," NBER Macroeconomics Annual, University of Chicago Press, vol. 32(1), pages 1-75.
    4. Nils M. Gornemann & Keith Kuester & Makoto Nakajima, 2016. "Doves for the Rich, Hawks for the Poor? Distributional Consequences of Monetary Policy," International Finance Discussion Papers 1167, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    5. Den Haan, Wouter J., 2010. "Comparison of solutions to the incomplete markets model with aggregate uncertainty," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 4-27, January.
    6. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5946 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Epstein, Larry G & Zin, Stanley E, 1991. "Substitution, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(2), pages 263-286, April.
    8. Frank Smets & Rafael Wouters, 2007. "Shocks and Frictions in US Business Cycles: A Bayesian DSGE Approach," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(3), pages 586-606, June.
    9. Aubhik Khan, 2017. "Large Recessions in an Overlapping Generations with Unemployment," 2017 Meeting Papers 1559, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    10. Stephen J. Terry, 2017. "Alternative Methods for Solving Heterogeneous Firm Models," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 49(6), pages 1081-1111, September.
    11. Per Krusell, 2017. "Comment on "When Inequality Matters for Macro and Macro Matters for Inequality"," NBER Chapters, in: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2017, volume 32, pages 93-108, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Reiter, Michael, 2010. "Solving the incomplete markets model with aggregate uncertainty by backward induction," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 28-35, January.
    13. Den Haan, Wouter J. & Judd, Kenneth L. & Juillard, Michel, 2010. "Computational suite of models with heterogeneous agents: Incomplete markets and aggregate uncertainty," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 1-3, January.
    14. Young, Eric R., 2010. "Solving the incomplete markets model with aggregate uncertainty using the Krusell-Smith algorithm and non-stochastic simulations," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 36-41, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Takeki Sunakawa, 2020. "Applying the Explicit Aggregation Algorithm to Heterogeneous Macro Models," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 55(3), pages 845-874, March.
    2. Chipeniuk, Karsten O. & Katz, Nets Hawk & Walker, Todd B., 2022. "Households, auctioneers, and aggregation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    3. Grey Gordon, 2020. "Computing Dynamic Heterogeneous-Agent Economies: Tracking the Distribution," Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, issue 2Q, pages 61-95.
    4. Emoto, Masakazu & Sunakawa, Takeki, 2021. "Applying the explicit aggregation algorithm to heterogeneous agent models in continuous time," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    5. Karsten O. Chipeniuk & Nets Hawk Katz & Todd Bruce Walker, 2022. "Households, Auctioneers, and Aggregation," CAEPR Working Papers 2022-005 Classification-E, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Department of Economics, Indiana University Bloomington.
    6. Jesús Fernández‐Villaverde & Samuel Hurtado & Galo Nuño, 2023. "Financial Frictions and the Wealth Distribution," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(3), pages 869-901, May.
    7. Adrien Auclert & Bence Bardóczy & Matthew Rognlie & Ludwig Straub, 2021. "Using the Sequence‐Space Jacobian to Solve and Estimate Heterogeneous‐Agent Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(5), pages 2375-2408, September.
    8. Karsten O. Chipeniuk, 2020. "Optimal Grid Selection for the Numerical Solution of Dynamic Stochastic Optimization Problems," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 56(4), pages 883-928, December.
    9. Tobias Grasl, 2013. "Solving Incomplete Markets Models by Derivative Aggregation," Birkbeck Working Papers in Economics and Finance 1302, Birkbeck, Department of Economics, Mathematics & Statistics.
    10. Michael Reiter, 2019. "Solving Heterogeneous Agent Models with Non-convex Optimization Problems: Linearization and Beyond %," 2019 Meeting Papers 1048, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    11. Gouin-Bonenfant, Emilien & Toda, Alexis Akira, 2018. "Pareto Extrapolation: Bridging Theoretical and Quantitative Models of Wealth Inequality," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt90n2h2bb, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    12. Michael C. Hatcher & Eric M. Scheffel, 2016. "Solving the Incomplete Markets Model in Parallel Using GPU Computing and the Krusell–Smith Algorithm," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 48(4), pages 569-591, December.
    13. Anmol Bhandari & David Evans & Mikhail Golosov & Thomas J. Sargent, 2021. "Inequality, Business Cycles, and Monetary‐Fiscal Policy," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(6), pages 2559-2599, November.
    14. Christian Bayer & Ralph Luetticke, 2020. "Solving discrete time heterogeneous agent models with aggregate risk and many idiosyncratic states by perturbation," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 11(4), pages 1253-1288, November.
    15. François Le Grand & Xavier Ragot, 2022. "Managing Inequality Over Business Cycles: Optimal Policies With Heterogeneous Agents And Aggregate Shocks," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(1), pages 511-540, February.
    16. Cameron Fen, 2022. "Fast Simulation-Based Bayesian Estimation of Heterogeneous and Representative Agent Models using Normalizing Flow Neural Networks," Papers 2203.06537, arXiv.org.
    17. Heejeong Kim, 2022. "Inequality, Disaster risk, and the Great Recession," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 45, pages 187-216, July.
    18. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/4lhe3u3c38ojohjlcbfaupcjr is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Marco Cozzi, 2015. "The Krusell–Smith Algorithm: Are Self-Fulfilling Equilibria Likely?," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 46(4), pages 653-670, December.
    20. Broer, Tobias & Kohlhas, Alexandre N. & Mitman, Kurt & Schlafmann, Kathrin, 2022. "On the possibility of Krusell-Smith Equilibria," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    21. Adrien Auclert & Ludwig Straub & Matthew Rognlie, 2019. "Micro Jumps, Macro Humps: monetary policy and business cycles in an estimated HANK model," 2019 Meeting Papers 1449, Society for Economic Dynamics.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed019:1470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Zimmermann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sedddea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.