Modern financial markets increasingly rely on complex financial products. These products often change hands even though the buyers acquire little information about the underlying structure of the financial asset. The greater the complexity of the asset structure, the more opaque it tends to be in the sense that acquiring information about the structure is difficult and thus more costly. But are these opaque assets socially beneficial? To address this question, we construct a environment in which agents trade assets that have random returns. The buyer of the asset has the opportunity to inspect the asset, at some cost, to assess its fundamental value. In short, the buyer chooses to perform due diligence or not prior to accepting the asset. We use a mechanism design approach to determine when it is socially optimal to have opaque assets. We characterize the set of allocations that satisfy sequential participation constraints for both buyers and sellers of the assets. We show that asset trade without due diligence can generate the first-best allocation if the variance of the asset return is sufficiently low or agents are sufficiently patient. This holds even if the cost of acquiring information about the asset is costless. With sufficiently high return variance or impatience, lack of due diligence can still be the optimal outcome but the first best allocation is not implementable. For sufficiently low costs of information acquisition, due diligence is optimal if the return is sufficiently variable and agents are impatient.
|Date of creation:||2011|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Society for Economic Dynamics Marina Azzimonti Department of Economics Stonybrook University 10 Nicolls Road Stonybrook NY 11790 USA|
Web page: http://www.EconomicDynamics.org/
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Ricardo Lagos & Randall Wright, 2002.
"A unified framework for monetary theory and policy analysis,"
0211, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
- Ricardo Lagos & Randall Wright, 2005. "A Unified Framework for Monetary Theory and Policy Analysis," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 113(3), pages 463-484, June.
- Ricardo Lagos & Randall Wright, 2004. "A unified framework for monetary theory and policy analysis," Staff Report 346, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
- Shouyong Shi, 1997.
"A Divisible Search Model of Fiat Money,"
Econometric Society, vol. 65(1), pages 75-102, January.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed011:994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christian Zimmermann)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.