IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

A Comparison of Japanese Corporate Finance Between the High Growth Period and the Bubble Economy: Eichner-Kaleckian Modelling And An Analysis

The two Japanese economies, the high growth period economy and the Bubble Economy have common features, but they are different in many respects. Though different models for analysing these two economies appear here, they are basically the same. They are based on the Eichner-Kaleckian type models, and the model for the high growth period economy could be located as a special case of the Bubble Economy model. The reason for not applying the latter model to both periods is that not doing so makes the common features and differences of both periods clearer. In both economies, the predetermined or exogenous variables, bank loan interest rate in the high growth period and financial investment return net of risk play key roles. Finally, these Eichner-Kaleckian models seem to contradict Post Keynesian endogenous money supply. It is proven below that this is not true.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/eserv/UQ:11073/DP266Nov99.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia in its series Discussion Papers Series with number 266.

as
in new window

Length:
Date of creation: Nov 1999
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:qld:uq2004:266
Contact details of provider: Postal: St. Lucia, Qld. 4072
Phone: +61 7 3365 6570
Fax: +61 7 3365 7299
Web page: http://www.uq.edu.au/economics/Email:


More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. Nash, John, 1950. "The Bargaining Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 18(2), pages 155-162, April.
  2. Terzi, Andrea, 1986. "Finance, Investment and Saving: A Comment," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 77-80, March.
  3. Nash, John, 1953. "Two-Person Cooperative Games," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 21(1), pages 128-140, April.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qld:uq2004:266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SOE IT)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.